Evaluation of YouTube Videos on Defibrillation Applications in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Comprehensive Analysis

Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.4103/njcp.njcp_68_24
İ. Aksoy
{"title":"Evaluation of YouTube Videos on Defibrillation Applications in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Comprehensive Analysis","authors":"İ. Aksoy","doi":"10.4103/njcp.njcp_68_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n In the realm of healthcare, particularly after the COVID-19 pandemic, there is a rising trend of sharing videos on YouTube. The increased popularity of these videos among Internet users can be attributed to the captivating nature of visual and auditory data compared to written information.\n \n \n \n This study aims to assess the content, accuracy, reliability, and quality of YouTube videos focusing on defibrillation applications—a critical component of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).\n \n \n \n On October 17, 2022, a video search was conducted using the keyword “defibrillation” on the YouTube platform, sorted in order of interest. Various parameters, including views, view rate, duration, comments, total likes and dislikes, target population, JAMA, DISCERN, and GQS scores, were recorded. In addition, content information was evaluated by Emergency Medicine specialists.\n \n \n \n The average video duration was 263.95 seconds, with an average of 90,574.6 views, 587.4 likes, and 19.1 comments. The mean DISCERN score was 35.9 (poor), modified DISCERN score was 1.7, GQS score was 2.7, and JAMA score was 2. The mean score regarding the scope and detail of information in the videos was calculated as 6.1.\n \n \n \n Deficiencies in the accuracy and reliability of Internet information were observed, mirroring the findings in our study. Supervision in this regard was often found to be inadequate. We advocate for the evaluation of video appropriateness before sharing on the Internet. We believe that platforms ensuring easy access to accurate information about crucial interventions such as CPR will significantly contribute to improving health literacy.\n","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_68_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the realm of healthcare, particularly after the COVID-19 pandemic, there is a rising trend of sharing videos on YouTube. The increased popularity of these videos among Internet users can be attributed to the captivating nature of visual and auditory data compared to written information. This study aims to assess the content, accuracy, reliability, and quality of YouTube videos focusing on defibrillation applications—a critical component of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). On October 17, 2022, a video search was conducted using the keyword “defibrillation” on the YouTube platform, sorted in order of interest. Various parameters, including views, view rate, duration, comments, total likes and dislikes, target population, JAMA, DISCERN, and GQS scores, were recorded. In addition, content information was evaluated by Emergency Medicine specialists. The average video duration was 263.95 seconds, with an average of 90,574.6 views, 587.4 likes, and 19.1 comments. The mean DISCERN score was 35.9 (poor), modified DISCERN score was 1.7, GQS score was 2.7, and JAMA score was 2. The mean score regarding the scope and detail of information in the videos was calculated as 6.1. Deficiencies in the accuracy and reliability of Internet information were observed, mirroring the findings in our study. Supervision in this regard was often found to be inadequate. We advocate for the evaluation of video appropriateness before sharing on the Internet. We believe that platforms ensuring easy access to accurate information about crucial interventions such as CPR will significantly contribute to improving health literacy.
分享
查看原文
评估 YouTube 视频在心肺复苏中的除颤应用:综合分析
在医疗保健领域,尤其是在 COVID-19 大流行之后,在 YouTube 上分享视频的趋势日益高涨。这些视频在网民中越来越受欢迎的原因是,与书面信息相比,视觉和听觉数据具有吸引人的特点。 本研究旨在评估 YouTube 视频的内容、准确性、可靠性和质量,重点关注除颤应用--心肺复苏术(CPR)的重要组成部分。 2022 年 10 月 17 日,我们在 YouTube 平台上使用关键词 "除颤 "进行了视频搜索,并按兴趣排序。记录了各种参数,包括观看次数、观看率、持续时间、评论、总点赞数和不点赞数、目标人群、JAMA、DISCERN 和 GQS 分数。此外,急诊医学专家还对内容信息进行了评估。 视频平均时长为 263.95 秒,平均观看次数为 90,574.6 次,平均点赞次数为 587.4 次,平均评论次数为 19.1 次。平均 DISCERN 得分为 35.9 分(差),修改后的 DISCERN 得分为 1.7 分,GQS 得分为 2.7 分,JAMA 得分为 2 分,视频信息的范围和细节方面的平均得分为 6.1 分。 在互联网信息的准确性和可靠性方面存在不足,这与我们的研究结果如出一辙。这方面的监督往往不足。我们主张在互联网上分享视频之前,先对其适当性进行评估。我们相信,确保能够轻松获取心肺复苏术等重要干预措施准确信息的平台将大大有助于提高健康素养。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信