Correspondence Between Prince Vasyl-Kostiantyn Ostrozkyi and Kryshtof Radziwill as a Source

Petro Kulakovsky
{"title":"Correspondence Between Prince Vasyl-Kostiantyn Ostrozkyi and Kryshtof Radziwill as a Source","authors":"Petro Kulakovsky","doi":"10.15407/ul2024.07.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the correspondence of Kyiv voivode V.- K. Ostrozkyi to his son-in-law, an influential Lithuanian politician Kryštof Radziwill. This is almost the only relatively complete complex of the prince's correspondence in Ostroh, which, given the trusting relationship between both participants of the correspondence, allows us to reconstruct his inner world. As one might suspect, he significantly contradicted Ostroh's public persona. For the prince, the correct (\"old\") \"world\" remained in the past, in the times before the Union of Lublin from the year 1569. Innovations were perceived by Vasyl-Kostiantyn as a challenge to this world, which violated its traditional foundations and consisted of an attack on regionalism, a reduction in the political role of princes, and attempts to change the confessional picture of the newly created state. The prince believed that the policy of the Rzeczpospolita's leadership toward the Moscow state was ill-conceived. Ostrozkyi argued that constant wars with the eastern neighbor reduced the overall potential of Christian civilization in its confrontation with Islamic civilization, especially with the country which at that time embodied its offensive in Europe, the Ottoman Empire. Ostrozkyi appealed to Radziwill with the expectation of finding support in the confrontation with Jan Zajmoyskyi, an extremely influential crown chancellor and hetman in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. It is no coincidence that the Kyiv voivode focused on issues that might have been of interest to the Lithuanian magnate. In particular, these interests included: the attempts of the crown elite, led by J. Zamoyskyi to ignore the interests of the Lithuanian and Ruthenian nobility, unwillingness to pay due attention to defense issues, insufficient allocation of funds for the repair and construction of castle fortifications. Gradually, the correspondence reflects the problem of interfaith confrontation, which was the result of the growth of counter-reformation processes from the beginning of Sigismund III's rule in the Polish-Lithuanian state. Their main emphasis in Europe was on Protestantism (K. Radziwill represented Calvinism), but in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, as a result of the Union of Brest in 1596, the Counter-Reformation also acquired anti-Orthodox content. In general, the correspondence of Prince V.-K. Ostrozkyi is a unique source that allows us to reconstruct the main features of the identity of an influential princely stratum, which was significantly influenced by the transformation processes in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth in the second half of the sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries.","PeriodicalId":177521,"journal":{"name":"Ukraina Lithuanica. Studìï z ìstorìï Velikogo knâzìvstva Litovsʹkogo","volume":"14 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ukraina Lithuanica. Studìï z ìstorìï Velikogo knâzìvstva Litovsʹkogo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15407/ul2024.07.027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article analyzes the correspondence of Kyiv voivode V.- K. Ostrozkyi to his son-in-law, an influential Lithuanian politician Kryštof Radziwill. This is almost the only relatively complete complex of the prince's correspondence in Ostroh, which, given the trusting relationship between both participants of the correspondence, allows us to reconstruct his inner world. As one might suspect, he significantly contradicted Ostroh's public persona. For the prince, the correct ("old") "world" remained in the past, in the times before the Union of Lublin from the year 1569. Innovations were perceived by Vasyl-Kostiantyn as a challenge to this world, which violated its traditional foundations and consisted of an attack on regionalism, a reduction in the political role of princes, and attempts to change the confessional picture of the newly created state. The prince believed that the policy of the Rzeczpospolita's leadership toward the Moscow state was ill-conceived. Ostrozkyi argued that constant wars with the eastern neighbor reduced the overall potential of Christian civilization in its confrontation with Islamic civilization, especially with the country which at that time embodied its offensive in Europe, the Ottoman Empire. Ostrozkyi appealed to Radziwill with the expectation of finding support in the confrontation with Jan Zajmoyskyi, an extremely influential crown chancellor and hetman in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. It is no coincidence that the Kyiv voivode focused on issues that might have been of interest to the Lithuanian magnate. In particular, these interests included: the attempts of the crown elite, led by J. Zamoyskyi to ignore the interests of the Lithuanian and Ruthenian nobility, unwillingness to pay due attention to defense issues, insufficient allocation of funds for the repair and construction of castle fortifications. Gradually, the correspondence reflects the problem of interfaith confrontation, which was the result of the growth of counter-reformation processes from the beginning of Sigismund III's rule in the Polish-Lithuanian state. Their main emphasis in Europe was on Protestantism (K. Radziwill represented Calvinism), but in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, as a result of the Union of Brest in 1596, the Counter-Reformation also acquired anti-Orthodox content. In general, the correspondence of Prince V.-K. Ostrozkyi is a unique source that allows us to reconstruct the main features of the identity of an influential princely stratum, which was significantly influenced by the transformation processes in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth in the second half of the sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries.
瓦西里-科斯蒂安廷-奥斯特罗茨基亲王与克里希托夫-拉齐威尔之间的通信作为资料来源
文章分析了基辅省省长 V.- K. 奥斯特罗兹基伊与他的女婿、立陶宛有影响力的政治家克里希托夫-拉齐威尔的通信。这几乎是《奥斯特罗》中唯一相对完整的王子书信集,鉴于书信双方的信任关系,我们可以通过这本书重建王子的内心世界。正如人们所猜测的那样,他与奥斯特罗的公众形象大相径庭。对王子来说,正确的("旧")"世界 "还停留在过去,停留在 1569 年卢布林联盟之前的时代。瓦西里-科斯蒂安廷认为创新是对这一世界的挑战,它破坏了这一世界的传统基础,包括攻击地方主义、削弱王公的政治作用以及试图改变新成立国家的教派形象。王子认为,Rzeczpospolita 领导层对莫斯科国家的政策是欠考虑的。奥斯特罗兹基认为,与东邻的持续战争削弱了基督教文明与伊斯兰文明对抗的整体潜力,尤其是与当时在欧洲体现了其进攻性的国家奥斯曼帝国的对抗。奥斯特罗兹基向拉齐威尔发出呼吁,希望在与波兰-立陶宛联邦极具影响力的王室大臣和首相扬-扎伊莫伊斯基(Jan Zajmoyskyi)的对抗中得到支持。基辅省将重点放在立陶宛大亨可能感兴趣的问题上绝非偶然。特别是,这些利益包括:以 J. Zamoyskyi 为首的王室精英试图忽视立陶宛和鲁塞尼亚贵族的利益,不愿意对国防问题给予应有的关注,城堡防御工事的维修和建设资金分配不足。从西吉斯蒙德三世统治波兰-立陶宛国之初开始,反改革进程不断发展,书信逐渐反映出不同信仰间的对抗问题。他们在欧洲主要强调新教(K. Radziwill 代表加尔文教),但在波兰-立陶宛联邦,由于 1596 年的布列斯特联盟,反宗教改革也有了反东正教的内容。总的来说,V.-K. 奥斯特罗兹基亲王的书信是一部独特的作品。奥斯特罗茨基亲王的书信是一个独特的资料来源,它使我们能够重建一个有影响力的亲王阶层身份的主要特征,该阶层在 16 世纪下半叶和 17 世纪早期受到波兰-立陶宛联邦变革进程的重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信