Exploring optimal features and image analysis methods for crop type classification from the perspective of crop landscape heterogeneity

IF 3.8 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Chen Chen , Taifeng Dong , Zhaohai Wang , Chen Wang , Wenyao Song , Huanxue Zhang
{"title":"Exploring optimal features and image analysis methods for crop type classification from the perspective of crop landscape heterogeneity","authors":"Chen Chen ,&nbsp;Taifeng Dong ,&nbsp;Zhaohai Wang ,&nbsp;Chen Wang ,&nbsp;Wenyao Song ,&nbsp;Huanxue Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.rsase.2024.101308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Agricultural landscape structure (e.g., the shape of fields, crop diversity, and landscape heterogeneity) greatly influences the selection of methods for large-scale crop mapping using remote sensing data. However, in-depth assessments of its impacts on crop mapping remain infrequent in the existing literature. This study investigated the optimal crop identification features and image analysis methods including pixel- and object-based approaches on crop classification, through the integration of spectral and textural features across various quantitative agricultural landscapes. In the experiments, crop fields were initially delineated into four distinct landscapes using the K-means clustering algorithm based on analyzing 13 selected landscape metrics such as PLAND, LSI and SHDI. Both pixel- and object-based approaches were then employed to conduct crop classification was then conducted using 48 selected features including 9 band reflectance, 23 vegetation indices (VIs), and 16 textures) and two image analysis methods. Specifically, five classification schemes for the different combinations of feature datasets and image analysis methods were explored to assess the impacts of crop heterogeneity on crop classification. Results indicated the five landscape metrics (e.g., SPLIT, SHEI, Average distance, etc.) performed best in assessing crop heterogeneity. In general, spectral bands and VIs had a higher contribution in the compositional heterogeneity, while textural features and VIs played a more important role in the configurational heterogeneity. VIs in the object-based approach and texture features in the pixel-based approach can improved crop classification accuracy in configurational landscapes. The findings provide a theoretical basis on selecting optimal features and image analysis methods for crop classification in complex agricultural landscapes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":53227,"journal":{"name":"Remote Sensing Applications-Society and Environment","volume":"36 ","pages":"Article 101308"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Remote Sensing Applications-Society and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352938524001721","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Agricultural landscape structure (e.g., the shape of fields, crop diversity, and landscape heterogeneity) greatly influences the selection of methods for large-scale crop mapping using remote sensing data. However, in-depth assessments of its impacts on crop mapping remain infrequent in the existing literature. This study investigated the optimal crop identification features and image analysis methods including pixel- and object-based approaches on crop classification, through the integration of spectral and textural features across various quantitative agricultural landscapes. In the experiments, crop fields were initially delineated into four distinct landscapes using the K-means clustering algorithm based on analyzing 13 selected landscape metrics such as PLAND, LSI and SHDI. Both pixel- and object-based approaches were then employed to conduct crop classification was then conducted using 48 selected features including 9 band reflectance, 23 vegetation indices (VIs), and 16 textures) and two image analysis methods. Specifically, five classification schemes for the different combinations of feature datasets and image analysis methods were explored to assess the impacts of crop heterogeneity on crop classification. Results indicated the five landscape metrics (e.g., SPLIT, SHEI, Average distance, etc.) performed best in assessing crop heterogeneity. In general, spectral bands and VIs had a higher contribution in the compositional heterogeneity, while textural features and VIs played a more important role in the configurational heterogeneity. VIs in the object-based approach and texture features in the pixel-based approach can improved crop classification accuracy in configurational landscapes. The findings provide a theoretical basis on selecting optimal features and image analysis methods for crop classification in complex agricultural landscapes.

从作物景观异质性角度探索作物类型分类的最佳特征和图像分析方法
农业景观结构(如田地形状、作物多样性和景观异质性)在很大程度上影响着利用遥感数据进行大尺度作物测绘的方法选择。然而,在现有文献中,对其对作物绘图影响的深入评估仍然不多。本研究通过整合各种定量农业景观的光谱和纹理特征,研究了作物识别的最佳特征和图像分析方法,包括基于像素和对象的作物分类方法。在实验中,首先使用 K-means 聚类算法,在分析 13 个选定景观指标(如 PLAND、LSI 和 SHDI)的基础上,将作物田划分为四个不同的景观。然后,采用基于像素和基于对象的方法,利用 48 个选定特征(包括 9 个波段反射率、23 个植被指数和 16 个纹理)和两种图像分析方法进行作物分类。具体而言,针对特征数据集和图像分析方法的不同组合探索了五种分类方案,以评估作物异质性对作物分类的影响。结果表明,五种景观度量(如 SPLIT、SHEI、平均距离等)在评估作物异质性方面表现最佳。一般来说,光谱波段和VIs在成分异质性方面的贡献较大,而纹理特征和VIs在构型异质性方面发挥了更重要的作用。基于对象的方法中的 VIs 和基于像素的方法中的纹理特征可以提高构型景观中作物分类的准确性。这些发现为在复杂农业景观中选择最佳特征和图像分析方法进行作物分类提供了理论依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
8.50%
发文量
204
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: The journal ''Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment'' (RSASE) focuses on remote sensing studies that address specific topics with an emphasis on environmental and societal issues - regional / local studies with global significance. Subjects are encouraged to have an interdisciplinary approach and include, but are not limited by: " -Global and climate change studies addressing the impact of increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases, CO2 emission, carbon balance and carbon mitigation, energy system on social and environmental systems -Ecological and environmental issues including biodiversity, ecosystem dynamics, land degradation, atmospheric and water pollution, urban footprint, ecosystem management and natural hazards (e.g. earthquakes, typhoons, floods, landslides) -Natural resource studies including land-use in general, biomass estimation, forests, agricultural land, plantation, soils, coral reefs, wetland and water resources -Agriculture, food production systems and food security outcomes -Socio-economic issues including urban systems, urban growth, public health, epidemics, land-use transition and land use conflicts -Oceanography and coastal zone studies, including sea level rise projections, coastlines changes and the ocean-land interface -Regional challenges for remote sensing application techniques, monitoring and analysis, such as cloud screening and atmospheric correction for tropical regions -Interdisciplinary studies combining remote sensing, household survey data, field measurements and models to address environmental, societal and sustainability issues -Quantitative and qualitative analysis that documents the impact of using remote sensing studies in social, political, environmental or economic systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信