Alia N. DeLong , Claire Friedrichsen , Elizabeth H. Boughton , Hilary Swain , Maria Silveira, , Brent Sellers
{"title":"Collaborative grazing land science: using the nominal group technique (NGT) to facilitate decision making","authors":"Alia N. DeLong , Claire Friedrichsen , Elizabeth H. Boughton , Hilary Swain , Maria Silveira, , Brent Sellers","doi":"10.1016/j.rala.2024.05.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><ul><li><span>•</span><span><div>Rapid changes in science require rapid development of solutions. Working with diverse groups of stakeholders is important for developing robust research programs.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>Collaborative production (or coproduction) of knowledge can integrate multiple sources of knowledge from stakeholder groups such as farmers and ranchers, service providers, technical advisors, and nonprofit representatives.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>The nominal group technique (NGT) is one tool in coproduction of knowledge and is a simple and feasible methodology rangeland scientists can adopt in complex decision-making contexts.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>The Archbold-University of Florida Long-term Agroecosystem Research (LTAR) network used NGT with an advisory council of stakeholder representatives to develop priorities for their research program, particularly high-priority treatments and measurements.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>Coproduced science identifies potential solutions more quickly than any group working on their own. Researchers can use NGT during collaborative processes to incorporate multiple sources of expert knowledge to create a more complete picture of a given situation.</div></span></li></ul></div></div>","PeriodicalId":101057,"journal":{"name":"Rangelands","volume":"46 5","pages":"Pages 155-162"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rangelands","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190052824000385","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
•
Rapid changes in science require rapid development of solutions. Working with diverse groups of stakeholders is important for developing robust research programs.
•
Collaborative production (or coproduction) of knowledge can integrate multiple sources of knowledge from stakeholder groups such as farmers and ranchers, service providers, technical advisors, and nonprofit representatives.
•
The nominal group technique (NGT) is one tool in coproduction of knowledge and is a simple and feasible methodology rangeland scientists can adopt in complex decision-making contexts.
•
The Archbold-University of Florida Long-term Agroecosystem Research (LTAR) network used NGT with an advisory council of stakeholder representatives to develop priorities for their research program, particularly high-priority treatments and measurements.
•
Coproduced science identifies potential solutions more quickly than any group working on their own. Researchers can use NGT during collaborative processes to incorporate multiple sources of expert knowledge to create a more complete picture of a given situation.