Clinical Perspectives on Post-Operative Care for Tethered Oral Tissues (TOTs)

Robyn A. Merkel-Walsh, Lori L. Overland
{"title":"Clinical Perspectives on Post-Operative Care for Tethered Oral Tissues (TOTs)","authors":"Robyn A. Merkel-Walsh, Lori L. Overland","doi":"10.52010/ijom.2024.50.2.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Post-operative frenectomy care is often focused on active wound management (AWM) and followed by neuromuscular re-education (NMR). The standard practices of AWM are varied amongst providers. AWM is often expected to be performed by caregivers who have little to no experience with AWM. In contrast, NMR is individualized to patient needs and has been emerging in external evidence as a beneficial modality for the functional implications of tethered oral tissues (TOTs). It is guided by licensed professionals but is not often accessible or recommended. New Perspective: AWM and NMR often are similar in execution but differ in goals. AWM is focused on wound debridement and avoiding scarring or reattachment of the frena, whereas NMR is focused on airway, sleep, feeding, swallowing, speech, and optimal orofacial growth. AWM has little consensus or external evidence compared to NMR which has both internal and external evidence. AWM for oral care is also limited by scope of practice (SOP) which few licensed professionals have. NMR has a broader range of professionals such as International Board-Certified Lactation Consultants (IBCLCs), speech-language pathologists (SLPs), physical and occupational therapists (PT/OT) and registered dental hygienists (RDHs). Conclusions: NMR has multiple benefits post-operatively, is individualized and performed by multiple professionals. It is suggested that release providers consider gentle, functionally directed post-operative NMR techniques that are individualized, and research the impact these approaches have on wound care goals.","PeriodicalId":144078,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Orofacial Myology and Myofunctional Therapy","volume":"20 46","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Orofacial Myology and Myofunctional Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52010/ijom.2024.50.2.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Post-operative frenectomy care is often focused on active wound management (AWM) and followed by neuromuscular re-education (NMR). The standard practices of AWM are varied amongst providers. AWM is often expected to be performed by caregivers who have little to no experience with AWM. In contrast, NMR is individualized to patient needs and has been emerging in external evidence as a beneficial modality for the functional implications of tethered oral tissues (TOTs). It is guided by licensed professionals but is not often accessible or recommended. New Perspective: AWM and NMR often are similar in execution but differ in goals. AWM is focused on wound debridement and avoiding scarring or reattachment of the frena, whereas NMR is focused on airway, sleep, feeding, swallowing, speech, and optimal orofacial growth. AWM has little consensus or external evidence compared to NMR which has both internal and external evidence. AWM for oral care is also limited by scope of practice (SOP) which few licensed professionals have. NMR has a broader range of professionals such as International Board-Certified Lactation Consultants (IBCLCs), speech-language pathologists (SLPs), physical and occupational therapists (PT/OT) and registered dental hygienists (RDHs). Conclusions: NMR has multiple benefits post-operatively, is individualized and performed by multiple professionals. It is suggested that release providers consider gentle, functionally directed post-operative NMR techniques that are individualized, and research the impact these approaches have on wound care goals.
系带口腔组织 (TOT) 术后护理的临床视角
导言:手术切除术后护理通常侧重于积极的伤口管理 (AWM),然后进行神经肌肉再教育 (NMR)。不同医疗机构的积极伤口管理标准做法各不相同。人们通常希望由几乎没有伤口管理经验的护理人员进行伤口管理。与此相反,NMR 是根据患者的需求进行个性化治疗的,并已被外部证据证明是一种对系带口腔组织 (TOT) 的功能影响有益的方式。它由持证专业人员指导,但并不常见,也不推荐使用。新视角:AWM 和 NMR 通常在执行上相似,但目标不同。AWM侧重于伤口清创和避免瘢痕形成或frena重新附着,而NMR侧重于气道、睡眠、进食、吞咽、言语和最佳口面部发育。与同时拥有内部和外部证据的 NMR 相比,AWM 几乎没有共识或外部证据。用于口腔护理的 AWM 还受到执业范围(SOP)的限制,很少有持证专业人员拥有执业范围。NMR 有更广泛的专业人员,如国际委员会认证的哺乳顾问 (IBCLC)、言语病理学家 (SLP)、物理和职业治疗师 (PT/OT) 以及注册牙科保健师 (RDH)。结论:NMR 在术后有多种益处,是个性化的,由多个专业人员共同完成。建议放疗提供者考虑采用温和的、以功能为导向的个性化术后 NMR 技术,并研究这些方法对伤口护理目标的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信