Trend of Publication of Indian Biomedical Literature in Questionable Journals: A Journey From 2015 to 2022 and a Way Forward

Q4 Medicine
Himel Mondal, Shaikat Mondal, Sarika Mondal
{"title":"Trend of Publication of Indian Biomedical Literature in Questionable Journals: A Journey From 2015 to 2022 and a Way Forward","authors":"Himel Mondal, Shaikat Mondal, Sarika Mondal","doi":"10.4103/mjdrdypu.mjdrdypu_244_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\n \n \n \n Research publication is an important aspect of academic life as it aids in career progression. A high volume of publications by Indian authors is found in questionable journals. In 2020, the National Medical Commission (NMC) of India modified the list of accepted bibliographic databases, with one significant change being the exclusion of Index Copernicus. Our research question focused on whether this change had any impact on the publication patterns in questionable journals.\n \n \n \n This study aimed to observe the number of publications in the questionable journal before and after the change in the accepted database by the NMC.\n \n \n \n We prepared a final list of 12 questionable journals using extensive criteria to classify a journal as questionable. The journal issues from 2015 to 2022 were scrutinized to determine the number of original research articles, reviews, case reports, short communications, editorials, and letters to the editor.\n \n \n \n There was a gradual increase in the percentage of publications from 2015 to 2018, followed by a plateau that lasted for three years (2018–2020). However, there was a sudden decrease in publication numbers in 2021, reaching its lowest point in 2022 (χ2 [7] = 658.2, P < 0.0001). The majority of the articles were original research articles (94.54%), while only 3.27% of publications consisted of case reports and 1.45% were review articles. It is noteworthy that none of the journals published any editorials or letters to the editor.\n \n \n \n A change in the accepted bibliographical database by the NMC may be one of the reasons for the decline in publications in questionable journals. It is important for stakeholders to prioritize the promotion of sound research output from medical institutions rather than solely focusing on the number of publications. In this article, we have presented a holistic approach to address this issue.\n","PeriodicalId":18412,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth","volume":"36 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/mjdrdypu.mjdrdypu_244_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Research publication is an important aspect of academic life as it aids in career progression. A high volume of publications by Indian authors is found in questionable journals. In 2020, the National Medical Commission (NMC) of India modified the list of accepted bibliographic databases, with one significant change being the exclusion of Index Copernicus. Our research question focused on whether this change had any impact on the publication patterns in questionable journals. This study aimed to observe the number of publications in the questionable journal before and after the change in the accepted database by the NMC. We prepared a final list of 12 questionable journals using extensive criteria to classify a journal as questionable. The journal issues from 2015 to 2022 were scrutinized to determine the number of original research articles, reviews, case reports, short communications, editorials, and letters to the editor. There was a gradual increase in the percentage of publications from 2015 to 2018, followed by a plateau that lasted for three years (2018–2020). However, there was a sudden decrease in publication numbers in 2021, reaching its lowest point in 2022 (χ2 [7] = 658.2, P < 0.0001). The majority of the articles were original research articles (94.54%), while only 3.27% of publications consisted of case reports and 1.45% were review articles. It is noteworthy that none of the journals published any editorials or letters to the editor. A change in the accepted bibliographical database by the NMC may be one of the reasons for the decline in publications in questionable journals. It is important for stakeholders to prioritize the promotion of sound research output from medical institutions rather than solely focusing on the number of publications. In this article, we have presented a holistic approach to address this issue.
印度生物医学文献在问题期刊上发表的趋势:从 2015 年到 2022 年的历程与未来之路
ABSTRACT Research publication is an important aspect of academic life as it aids in career progression.印度作者在有问题的期刊上发表了大量论文。2020 年,印度国家医学委员会(NMC)修改了可接受的文献数据库列表,其中一个重大变化是将哥白尼索引排除在外。我们的研究问题主要是这一变化是否对问题期刊的发表模式产生了影响。 本研究旨在观察国家医学委员会更改接受数据库前后问题期刊的发表数量。 我们采用广泛的标准将期刊归类为问题期刊,最终编制了一份 12 种问题期刊的名单。我们对 2015 年至 2022 年的期刊进行了仔细研究,以确定原创研究文章、综述、病例报告、短篇通讯、社论和致编辑信的数量。 从 2015 年到 2018 年,发表文章的比例逐渐增加,随后出现了持续三年(2018-2020 年)的高原期。然而,2021年发表数量突然下降,2022年达到最低点(χ2 [7] = 658.2,P < 0.0001)。大部分文章为原创研究文章(94.54%),仅有 3.27% 的文章为病例报告,1.45% 为综述文章。值得注意的是,所有期刊均未发表社论或致编辑的信。 国家医学委员会对可接受的文献数据库进行了修改,这可能是问题期刊发表论文数量下降的原因之一。重要的是,利益相关者应优先考虑促进医疗机构的良好研究成果,而不是仅仅关注出版物的数量。在本文中,我们提出了解决这一问题的综合方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
221
审稿时长
43 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信