A Mixed Methods Study Exploring Patient Safety Culture at Four VHA Hospitals

IF 2.3 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Jennifer L. Sullivan PhD (is Associate Director, Center of Innovation in Long Term Services and Supports (LTSS COIN), VA [US Department of Veterans Affairs] Providence Healthcare System, Providence, Rhode Island, and Associate Professor, Department of Health Services, Policy and Practice, School of Public Health, Brown University.), Marlena H. Shin JD, MPH (is Research Health Scientist. Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), VA Boston Healthcare System.), Allison Ranusch MA (is Research Health Scientist, Center for Clinical Management Research (CCMR), VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor Michigan.), David C. Mohr PhD (is Investigator, Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), VA Boston Healthcare System, and Adjunct Research Assistant Professor, Department of Health Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health.), Charity Chen MS (is Data Analyst/Statistician, Center for Clinical Management Research (CCMR), VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System.), Laura J. Damschroder (is Research Scientist, VA Center for Clinical Management Research (CCMR) VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System. Please address correspondence to Jennifer L. Sullivan)
{"title":"A Mixed Methods Study Exploring Patient Safety Culture at Four VHA Hospitals","authors":"Jennifer L. Sullivan PhD (is Associate Director, Center of Innovation in Long Term Services and Supports (LTSS COIN), VA [US Department of Veterans Affairs] Providence Healthcare System, Providence, Rhode Island, and Associate Professor, Department of Health Services, Policy and Practice, School of Public Health, Brown University.),&nbsp;Marlena H. Shin JD, MPH (is Research Health Scientist. Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), VA Boston Healthcare System.),&nbsp;Allison Ranusch MA (is Research Health Scientist, Center for Clinical Management Research (CCMR), VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor Michigan.),&nbsp;David C. Mohr PhD (is Investigator, Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), VA Boston Healthcare System, and Adjunct Research Assistant Professor, Department of Health Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health.),&nbsp;Charity Chen MS (is Data Analyst/Statistician, Center for Clinical Management Research (CCMR), VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System.),&nbsp;Laura J. Damschroder (is Research Scientist, VA Center for Clinical Management Research (CCMR) VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System. Please address correspondence to Jennifer L. Sullivan)","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.07.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Patient safety culture (PSC) fosters an environment of trust where people are encouraged to share information to promote psychological safety. To measure PSC, the Veteran's Health Administration (VHA) developed a PSC survey consisting of 20 items administered to all VHA employees. The survey comprises four scales: (1) risk identification and Just Culture, (2) error transparency and mitigation, (3) supervisor communication and trust, and (4) team cohesion and engagement. Our objective was to compare the PSC survey data to qualitative data regarding high reliability organization (HRO) implementation from four purposively selected VHA hospitals to assess how it manifests and converges.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Qualitative data focused on understanding HRO implementation efforts were collected from key informants between 2019 and 2020 at 4 of the 18 VHA HRO implementation hospitals. To explore the extent and manifestation of each of the PSC scales among the 4 sites, we combined the qualitative data with the PSC survey data from each hospital using a joint display.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Survey responses were significantly different between the 4 hospitals for all 4 PSC scales. Of the 20 PSC survey items, 12 (60.0%) significantly differed across the 4 hospitals. For example, we saw cross-hospital differences in the following survey items: “We are given feedback about changes put into place based on event reports” and “We take the time to identify and assess risks to patient safety.” Qualitative data supported manifestations for 80.0% (16/20) of PSC individual survey items among hospitals.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The authors found that the qualitative data manifestations were well aligned with the VHA PSC scales, but relationships were not always consistent between data sources. Further research is necessary to elucidate these relationships.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14835,"journal":{"name":"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1553725024002289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Patient safety culture (PSC) fosters an environment of trust where people are encouraged to share information to promote psychological safety. To measure PSC, the Veteran's Health Administration (VHA) developed a PSC survey consisting of 20 items administered to all VHA employees. The survey comprises four scales: (1) risk identification and Just Culture, (2) error transparency and mitigation, (3) supervisor communication and trust, and (4) team cohesion and engagement. Our objective was to compare the PSC survey data to qualitative data regarding high reliability organization (HRO) implementation from four purposively selected VHA hospitals to assess how it manifests and converges.

Methods

Qualitative data focused on understanding HRO implementation efforts were collected from key informants between 2019 and 2020 at 4 of the 18 VHA HRO implementation hospitals. To explore the extent and manifestation of each of the PSC scales among the 4 sites, we combined the qualitative data with the PSC survey data from each hospital using a joint display.

Results

Survey responses were significantly different between the 4 hospitals for all 4 PSC scales. Of the 20 PSC survey items, 12 (60.0%) significantly differed across the 4 hospitals. For example, we saw cross-hospital differences in the following survey items: “We are given feedback about changes put into place based on event reports” and “We take the time to identify and assess risks to patient safety.” Qualitative data supported manifestations for 80.0% (16/20) of PSC individual survey items among hospitals.

Conclusion

The authors found that the qualitative data manifestations were well aligned with the VHA PSC scales, but relationships were not always consistent between data sources. Further research is necessary to elucidate these relationships.
探索 4 家退伍军人事务部医院患者安全文化的混合方法研究
背景患者安全文化(Patient Safety Culture,PSC)营造了一种信任的环境,鼓励人们分享信息以促进心理安全。为了衡量患者安全文化,退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)制定了一项患者安全文化调查,其中包括 20 个项目,调查对象为退伍军人健康管理局的所有员工。该调查包括四个量表:(1)风险识别和公正文化;(2)错误透明度和缓解;(3)主管沟通和信任;以及(4)团队凝聚力和参与度。我们的目标是将 PSC 调查数据与有目的选择的四家 VHA 医院有关高可靠性组织 (HRO) 实施的定性数据进行比较,以评估高可靠性组织 (HRO) 的表现和趋同情况。方法在 2019 年至 2020 年期间,我们从 18 家 VHA HRO 实施医院中的 4 家医院的关键信息提供者处收集了侧重于了解 HRO 实施工作的定性数据。为了探索这 4 家医院的 PSC 量表的程度和表现,我们使用联合显示屏将定性数据与每家医院的 PSC 调查数据结合起来。在 20 个 PSC 调查项目中,有 12 个项目(60.0%)在 4 家医院之间存在显著差异。例如,我们在以下调查项目中发现了医院间的差异:"我们会根据事件报告对已实施的变更进行反馈 "和 "我们会花时间识别和评估患者安全风险"。定性数据支持医院间 80.0% (16/20)的 PSC 单个调查项目的表现形式。结论作者发现,定性数据表现形式与 VHA PSC 量表非常吻合,但数据源之间的关系并不总是一致的。有必要开展进一步研究来阐明这些关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
116
审稿时长
49 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信