Assessment of Learning Approaches of Final-Year Medical Students in Nigeria

Q4 Medicine
O. Oguntoye
{"title":"Assessment of Learning Approaches of Final-Year Medical Students in Nigeria","authors":"O. Oguntoye","doi":"10.4103/mjdrdypu.mjdrdypu_201_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\n \n \n \n Approaches to learning can be broadly classified into three categories, namely deep approach, surface apathetic approach, and strategic approach.\n \n \n \n The aim of this study was to determine the learning approaches of final-year undergraduate medical students in Nigeria and to correlate them with their academic performance.\n \n \n \n This was a correlational study conducted among final-year (600-level) undergraduate medical students. The Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST) questionnaire was used for the study to determine the learning approaches of medical students.\n \n \n \n A total number of 100 final-year (600-level) undergraduate medical students participated in the study, of which 27 (27.0%) were males and 73 (73.0%) were females with a male-to-female ratio of 0.37 to 1. The age range of the respondents was 21 to 30 years with a mean (±SD) of 23.54 (±1.403). The strategic approach (40%) was the most predominant learning approach adopted by the medical students in this study followed by the deep approach (31%) and then the surface apathetic approach (29%). There is a significant positive correlation between the strategic approach and the self-rated academic progress of the students (P < 0.001). There is, however, no significant correlation between the academic progress of the students and the deep approach (P = 0.643) or the surface apathetic approach (P = 0.115).\n \n \n \n The strategic approach is the most predominant learning approach adopted by the final-year undergraduate medical students in this study with associated self-reported good academic performance. Appropriate study guidance should be provided to undergraduate medical students.\n","PeriodicalId":18412,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth","volume":"2 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/mjdrdypu.mjdrdypu_201_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Approaches to learning can be broadly classified into three categories, namely deep approach, surface apathetic approach, and strategic approach. The aim of this study was to determine the learning approaches of final-year undergraduate medical students in Nigeria and to correlate them with their academic performance. This was a correlational study conducted among final-year (600-level) undergraduate medical students. The Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST) questionnaire was used for the study to determine the learning approaches of medical students. A total number of 100 final-year (600-level) undergraduate medical students participated in the study, of which 27 (27.0%) were males and 73 (73.0%) were females with a male-to-female ratio of 0.37 to 1. The age range of the respondents was 21 to 30 years with a mean (±SD) of 23.54 (±1.403). The strategic approach (40%) was the most predominant learning approach adopted by the medical students in this study followed by the deep approach (31%) and then the surface apathetic approach (29%). There is a significant positive correlation between the strategic approach and the self-rated academic progress of the students (P < 0.001). There is, however, no significant correlation between the academic progress of the students and the deep approach (P = 0.643) or the surface apathetic approach (P = 0.115). The strategic approach is the most predominant learning approach adopted by the final-year undergraduate medical students in this study with associated self-reported good academic performance. Appropriate study guidance should be provided to undergraduate medical students.
尼日利亚医学专业毕业班学生学习方法评估
摘要 学习方法大致可分为三类,即深层方法、表层冷漠方法和战略方法。 本研究旨在确定尼日利亚医学专业应届本科生的学习方法,并将其与学习成绩联系起来。 这是一项在医学专业应届本科生(600 级)中开展的相关研究。研究采用了学生学习方法和学习技能调查问卷(ASSIST)来确定医科学生的学习方法。 共有 100 名应届(600 级)医科本科生参与研究,其中男生 27 人(27.0%),女生 73 人(73.0%),男女比例为 0.37:1。本研究中,医学生最主要采用的学习方法是战略方法(40%),其次是深度方法(31%)和表面冷漠方法(29%)。策略学习法与学生自评的学业进步之间存在明显的正相关(P < 0.001)。然而,学生的学业进步与深度方法(P = 0.643)或表面冷漠方法(P = 0.115)之间没有明显的相关性。 在本研究中,策略学习法是医学本科应届生采用的最主要的学习方法,其自我报告的学习成绩良好。应为本科医学生提供适当的学习指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
221
审稿时长
43 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信