Further clarifications needed: Why Jetschke et al. (2023) underestimated the efficacy of bias-adjusted, standardized growth changes for pointer-year detection

IF 2.7 3区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY
Allan Buras
{"title":"Further clarifications needed: Why Jetschke et al. (2023) underestimated the efficacy of bias-adjusted, standardized growth changes for pointer-year detection","authors":"Allan Buras","doi":"10.1016/j.dendro.2024.126240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In a recent communication, Jetschke et al. (2023) compared various pointer-year detection methods against the recently published (bias-adjusted) standardized growth change method (SGC and BSGC, Buras et al., 2020, 2022). Based on their comparative evaluation, Jetschke et al. (2023) pointed out specific weaknesses of the (B)SGC methods. In this short communication, I reveal their analyses to be erroneous and consequently their conclusions to be based on false grounds.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50595,"journal":{"name":"Dendrochronologia","volume":"88 ","pages":"Article 126240"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1125786524000778/pdfft?md5=5e14c4eb76e62dd57b3682d7d4cff37c&pid=1-s2.0-S1125786524000778-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dendrochronologia","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1125786524000778","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In a recent communication, Jetschke et al. (2023) compared various pointer-year detection methods against the recently published (bias-adjusted) standardized growth change method (SGC and BSGC, Buras et al., 2020, 2022). Based on their comparative evaluation, Jetschke et al. (2023) pointed out specific weaknesses of the (B)SGC methods. In this short communication, I reveal their analyses to be erroneous and consequently their conclusions to be based on false grounds.

需要进一步澄清:为什么 Jetschke 等人(2023 年)低估了经偏差调整的标准化生长变化对指针年检测的功效?
在最近的一篇通讯中,Jetschke 等人(2023 年)将各种指针年检测方法与最近发表的(偏差调整)标准化生长变化方法(SGC 和 BSGC,Buras 等人,2020 年,2022 年)进行了比较。根据他们的比较评估,Jetschke 等人(2023 年)指出了 (B)SGC 方法的具体弱点。在这篇短文中,我将揭示他们的分析是错误的,因此他们的结论是建立在错误的基础之上的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dendrochronologia
Dendrochronologia FORESTRY-GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
13.30%
发文量
82
审稿时长
22.8 weeks
期刊介绍: Dendrochronologia is a peer-reviewed international scholarly journal that presents high-quality research related to growth rings of woody plants, i.e., trees and shrubs, and the application of tree-ring studies. The areas covered by the journal include, but are not limited to: Archaeology Botany Climatology Ecology Forestry Geology Hydrology Original research articles, reviews, communications, technical notes and personal notes are considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信