Patients With Shoulder Labral Tears Search the Internet to Understand Their Diagnoses and Treatment Options

Q3 Medicine
Gary George M.D., Muhammad J. Abbas M.D., Joshua P. Castle M.D., Michael A. Gaudiani M.D., Matthew Gasparro M.D., Noel O. Akioyamen M.D., Matthew Corsi B.S., Brittaney Pratt B.S., Stephanie J. Muh M.D., T. Sean Lynch M.D.
{"title":"Patients With Shoulder Labral Tears Search the Internet to Understand Their Diagnoses and Treatment Options","authors":"Gary George M.D.,&nbsp;Muhammad J. Abbas M.D.,&nbsp;Joshua P. Castle M.D.,&nbsp;Michael A. Gaudiani M.D.,&nbsp;Matthew Gasparro M.D.,&nbsp;Noel O. Akioyamen M.D.,&nbsp;Matthew Corsi B.S.,&nbsp;Brittaney Pratt B.S.,&nbsp;Stephanie J. Muh M.D.,&nbsp;T. Sean Lynch M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To analyze the most frequently searched questions associated with shoulder labral pathology and to evaluate the source-type availability and quality.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Common shoulder labral pathology-related search terms were entered into Google, and the suggested frequently asked questions were compiled and categorized. In addition, suggested sources were recorded, categorized, and scored for quality of information using JAMA <em>(The Journal of the American Medical Association)</em> benchmark criteria. Statistical analysis was performed to compare the types of questions and their associated sources, as well as the quality of sources.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In this study, 513 questions and 170 sources were identified and categorized. The most popular topics were diagnosis/evaluation (21.5%) and indications/management (21.1%.). The most common website types were academic (27.9%), commercial (25.2%), and medical practice (22.5%). Multiple statistically significant associations were found between specific question categories and their associated source types. The average JAMA quality score for all sources was 1.56, and medical websites had significantly lower quality scores than nonmedical sites (1.05 vs 2.12, <em>P</em> &lt; .001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Patients searching the internet for information regarding shoulder labral pathology often look for facts regarding the diagnosis and management of their conditions. They use various source types to better understand their conditions, with government sources being of the highest quality, whereas medical sites showed statistically lower quality. Across the spectrum of questions, the quality of readily available resources varies substantially.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical Relevance</h3><div>The use of online resources in health care is expanding. It is important to understand the most commonly asked questions and the quality of information available to patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34631,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"6 6","pages":"Article 100983"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666061X2400110X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To analyze the most frequently searched questions associated with shoulder labral pathology and to evaluate the source-type availability and quality.

Methods

Common shoulder labral pathology-related search terms were entered into Google, and the suggested frequently asked questions were compiled and categorized. In addition, suggested sources were recorded, categorized, and scored for quality of information using JAMA (The Journal of the American Medical Association) benchmark criteria. Statistical analysis was performed to compare the types of questions and their associated sources, as well as the quality of sources.

Results

In this study, 513 questions and 170 sources were identified and categorized. The most popular topics were diagnosis/evaluation (21.5%) and indications/management (21.1%.). The most common website types were academic (27.9%), commercial (25.2%), and medical practice (22.5%). Multiple statistically significant associations were found between specific question categories and their associated source types. The average JAMA quality score for all sources was 1.56, and medical websites had significantly lower quality scores than nonmedical sites (1.05 vs 2.12, P < .001).

Conclusions

Patients searching the internet for information regarding shoulder labral pathology often look for facts regarding the diagnosis and management of their conditions. They use various source types to better understand their conditions, with government sources being of the highest quality, whereas medical sites showed statistically lower quality. Across the spectrum of questions, the quality of readily available resources varies substantially.

Clinical Relevance

The use of online resources in health care is expanding. It is important to understand the most commonly asked questions and the quality of information available to patients.
肩关节唇撕裂患者通过互联网了解诊断和治疗方案
目的分析与肩唇病理相关的最常见搜索问题,并评估来源类型的可得性和质量。方法在谷歌中输入常见的肩唇病理相关检索词,对建议的常见问题进行整理和分类。此外,建议的来源被记录、分类,并使用JAMA(美国医学协会杂志)基准标准对信息质量进行评分。进行统计分析,比较问题的类型及其相关来源,以及来源的质量。结果在本研究中,识别并分类了513个问题和170个来源。最受欢迎的话题是诊断/评估(21.5%)和指征/管理(21.1%)。最常见的网站类型是学术(27.9%)、商业(25.2%)和医疗实践(22.5%)。在特定的问题类别和它们相关的来源类型之间发现了多个统计上显著的关联。所有来源的JAMA质量得分平均为1.56,医疗网站的质量得分明显低于非医疗网站(1.05 vs 2.12, P <;措施)。结论患者在网络上搜索有关肩唇病理的信息,往往是为了寻找有关其病情的诊断和处理的事实。他们使用各种来源来更好地了解自己的情况,其中政府来源的质量最高,而医疗网站的质量在统计上较低。在各种各样的问题中,现成资源的质量差别很大。临床相关性在线资源在卫生保健领域的使用正在扩大。了解最常见的问题和患者可获得的信息质量是很重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
218
审稿时长
45 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信