Gary George M.D., Muhammad J. Abbas M.D., Joshua P. Castle M.D., Michael A. Gaudiani M.D., Matthew Gasparro M.D., Noel O. Akioyamen M.D., Matthew Corsi B.S., Brittaney Pratt B.S., Stephanie J. Muh M.D., T. Sean Lynch M.D.
{"title":"Patients With Shoulder Labral Tears Search the Internet to Understand Their Diagnoses and Treatment Options","authors":"Gary George M.D., Muhammad J. Abbas M.D., Joshua P. Castle M.D., Michael A. Gaudiani M.D., Matthew Gasparro M.D., Noel O. Akioyamen M.D., Matthew Corsi B.S., Brittaney Pratt B.S., Stephanie J. Muh M.D., T. Sean Lynch M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To analyze the most frequently searched questions associated with shoulder labral pathology and to evaluate the source-type availability and quality.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Common shoulder labral pathology-related search terms were entered into Google, and the suggested frequently asked questions were compiled and categorized. In addition, suggested sources were recorded, categorized, and scored for quality of information using JAMA <em>(The Journal of the American Medical Association)</em> benchmark criteria. Statistical analysis was performed to compare the types of questions and their associated sources, as well as the quality of sources.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In this study, 513 questions and 170 sources were identified and categorized. The most popular topics were diagnosis/evaluation (21.5%) and indications/management (21.1%.). The most common website types were academic (27.9%), commercial (25.2%), and medical practice (22.5%). Multiple statistically significant associations were found between specific question categories and their associated source types. The average JAMA quality score for all sources was 1.56, and medical websites had significantly lower quality scores than nonmedical sites (1.05 vs 2.12, <em>P</em> < .001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Patients searching the internet for information regarding shoulder labral pathology often look for facts regarding the diagnosis and management of their conditions. They use various source types to better understand their conditions, with government sources being of the highest quality, whereas medical sites showed statistically lower quality. Across the spectrum of questions, the quality of readily available resources varies substantially.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical Relevance</h3><div>The use of online resources in health care is expanding. It is important to understand the most commonly asked questions and the quality of information available to patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34631,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"6 6","pages":"Article 100983"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666061X2400110X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
To analyze the most frequently searched questions associated with shoulder labral pathology and to evaluate the source-type availability and quality.
Methods
Common shoulder labral pathology-related search terms were entered into Google, and the suggested frequently asked questions were compiled and categorized. In addition, suggested sources were recorded, categorized, and scored for quality of information using JAMA (The Journal of the American Medical Association) benchmark criteria. Statistical analysis was performed to compare the types of questions and their associated sources, as well as the quality of sources.
Results
In this study, 513 questions and 170 sources were identified and categorized. The most popular topics were diagnosis/evaluation (21.5%) and indications/management (21.1%.). The most common website types were academic (27.9%), commercial (25.2%), and medical practice (22.5%). Multiple statistically significant associations were found between specific question categories and their associated source types. The average JAMA quality score for all sources was 1.56, and medical websites had significantly lower quality scores than nonmedical sites (1.05 vs 2.12, P < .001).
Conclusions
Patients searching the internet for information regarding shoulder labral pathology often look for facts regarding the diagnosis and management of their conditions. They use various source types to better understand their conditions, with government sources being of the highest quality, whereas medical sites showed statistically lower quality. Across the spectrum of questions, the quality of readily available resources varies substantially.
Clinical Relevance
The use of online resources in health care is expanding. It is important to understand the most commonly asked questions and the quality of information available to patients.
目的分析与肩唇病理相关的最常见搜索问题,并评估来源类型的可得性和质量。方法在谷歌中输入常见的肩唇病理相关检索词,对建议的常见问题进行整理和分类。此外,建议的来源被记录、分类,并使用JAMA(美国医学协会杂志)基准标准对信息质量进行评分。进行统计分析,比较问题的类型及其相关来源,以及来源的质量。结果在本研究中,识别并分类了513个问题和170个来源。最受欢迎的话题是诊断/评估(21.5%)和指征/管理(21.1%)。最常见的网站类型是学术(27.9%)、商业(25.2%)和医疗实践(22.5%)。在特定的问题类别和它们相关的来源类型之间发现了多个统计上显著的关联。所有来源的JAMA质量得分平均为1.56,医疗网站的质量得分明显低于非医疗网站(1.05 vs 2.12, P <;措施)。结论患者在网络上搜索有关肩唇病理的信息,往往是为了寻找有关其病情的诊断和处理的事实。他们使用各种来源来更好地了解自己的情况,其中政府来源的质量最高,而医疗网站的质量在统计上较低。在各种各样的问题中,现成资源的质量差别很大。临床相关性在线资源在卫生保健领域的使用正在扩大。了解最常见的问题和患者可获得的信息质量是很重要的。