16. When to initiate postoperative physical therapy in multilevel posterior cervical-thoracic fusions?

Q3 Medicine
{"title":"16. When to initiate postoperative physical therapy in multilevel posterior cervical-thoracic fusions?","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>BACKGROUND CONTEXT</h3><p>The role of <strong>p</strong>hysical <strong>t</strong>herapy (PT) in patients undergoing surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy is understudied and not well understood. Current literature reports varied effects on outcomes, and thus postoperative standards of care neither address nor include PT in post-op posterior cervico-thoracic fusions.</p></div><div><h3>PURPOSE</h3><p>The aim of this study was to analyze when neck strengthening exercise should be initiated after multilevel posterior cervical-thoracic fusions.</p></div><div><h3>STUDY DESIGN/SETTING</h3><p>Multicenter retrospective study.</p></div><div><h3>PATIENT SAMPLE</h3><p>A total of 105 adult spine patients.</p></div><div><h3>OUTCOME MEASURES</h3><p>Clinical and radiographic outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><p>Retrospective chart reviews were conducted between 2016-2020 on patients who underwent a ≥3 level posterior cervico-thoracic fusion with caudal levels as C7 and T1/T2. Prescription and completion of PT were study inclusion criteria. Demographic, clinical, and radiographic data was collected at structured intervals from preoperative to 2 years postoperative. Percent <strong>i</strong>mprovement for cervical lordosis, T1 slope and C2-C7 sagittal plumbline was compared at 2 weeks and 2 years postop. Visual <strong>a</strong>nalog <strong>s</strong>cale (VAS) for pain and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores were similarly analyzed.</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><p>In total, 105 patients were included in the study and were divided into two cohorts: those that initiated PT ≤ 6 weeks postop and those who initiated PT &gt; 6 weeks postop. A total of 58 patients were included in the Early PT cohort, and 47 were included in the Late PT cohort. Demographically, the Early PT and Late PT cohorts were similar in age (62.8 vs 61.1 years, respectively) and predominantly female (64.5% vs 67.6%, respectively). No significant difference was reported between the groups in body mass index, with a mean of 30.7 for Early PT and 31.2 for Late PT. While both cohorts showed improvement in radiographic parameters and patient reported outcomes at 2 years postop, there were significant differences in level of improvement between the two groups. The Early PT group had a comparatively better % improvement in cervical lordosis (25.2% vs 14.2%); mean T1 slope (-5.6% vs -2.6%); and mean C2-C7 sagittal plumbline (-15.2% vs -11.7%). Patients who started PT ≤ 6 weeks postop also reported greater VAS % improvement 61.9% vs 41% and Oswestry Disability Index % improvement 46.3% vs 29.6% at 2 years post-op.</p></div><div><h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3><p>Patients who underwent a 3- or more-level posterior cervico-thoracic fusion and started PT at or before 6 weeks postop exhibited greater radiographic and patient reported outcomes benefits than those starting PT more than 6 weeks postop. The results of this study support the early initiation of neck strengthening PT in most uncomplicated post-cervical fusion adult patients.</p></div><div><h3>FDA Device/Drug Status</h3><p>This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34622,"journal":{"name":"North American Spine Society Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666548424000477/pdfft?md5=820e61eb7287eaf3b212eef968a72b74&pid=1-s2.0-S2666548424000477-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North American Spine Society Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666548424000477","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

The role of physical therapy (PT) in patients undergoing surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy is understudied and not well understood. Current literature reports varied effects on outcomes, and thus postoperative standards of care neither address nor include PT in post-op posterior cervico-thoracic fusions.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to analyze when neck strengthening exercise should be initiated after multilevel posterior cervical-thoracic fusions.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Multicenter retrospective study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

A total of 105 adult spine patients.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Clinical and radiographic outcomes.

METHODS

Retrospective chart reviews were conducted between 2016-2020 on patients who underwent a ≥3 level posterior cervico-thoracic fusion with caudal levels as C7 and T1/T2. Prescription and completion of PT were study inclusion criteria. Demographic, clinical, and radiographic data was collected at structured intervals from preoperative to 2 years postoperative. Percent improvement for cervical lordosis, T1 slope and C2-C7 sagittal plumbline was compared at 2 weeks and 2 years postop. Visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores were similarly analyzed.

RESULTS

In total, 105 patients were included in the study and were divided into two cohorts: those that initiated PT ≤ 6 weeks postop and those who initiated PT > 6 weeks postop. A total of 58 patients were included in the Early PT cohort, and 47 were included in the Late PT cohort. Demographically, the Early PT and Late PT cohorts were similar in age (62.8 vs 61.1 years, respectively) and predominantly female (64.5% vs 67.6%, respectively). No significant difference was reported between the groups in body mass index, with a mean of 30.7 for Early PT and 31.2 for Late PT. While both cohorts showed improvement in radiographic parameters and patient reported outcomes at 2 years postop, there were significant differences in level of improvement between the two groups. The Early PT group had a comparatively better % improvement in cervical lordosis (25.2% vs 14.2%); mean T1 slope (-5.6% vs -2.6%); and mean C2-C7 sagittal plumbline (-15.2% vs -11.7%). Patients who started PT ≤ 6 weeks postop also reported greater VAS % improvement 61.9% vs 41% and Oswestry Disability Index % improvement 46.3% vs 29.6% at 2 years post-op.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who underwent a 3- or more-level posterior cervico-thoracic fusion and started PT at or before 6 weeks postop exhibited greater radiographic and patient reported outcomes benefits than those starting PT more than 6 weeks postop. The results of this study support the early initiation of neck strengthening PT in most uncomplicated post-cervical fusion adult patients.

FDA Device/Drug Status

This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.

16.颈胸椎多平面后路融合术术后何时开始物理治疗?
背景 CONTEXTT 物理治疗(PT)在接受颈椎脊髓病手术的患者中的作用还未得到充分研究和了解。目前的文献报道对疗效的影响各不相同,因此术后护理标准既不涉及也不包括颈胸椎后路融合术后的物理治疗。目的本研究旨在分析多层次颈胸椎后路融合术后何时应开始颈部强化锻炼。研究设计/设置多中心回顾性研究.患者样本共 105 名成年脊柱患者.结果测量临床和影像学结果.方法在 2016-2020 年间对接受≥3 级后路颈胸椎融合术的患者进行了回顾性病历审查,患者的尾椎水平为 C7 和 T1/T2。处方和完成 PT 是研究的纳入标准。从术前到术后两年,按结构化时间间隔收集人口统计学、临床和影像学数据。比较术后两周和两年时颈椎前凸、T1斜度和C2-C7矢状垂线的改善百分比。对疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)和 Oswestry 失能指数(ODI)的评分也进行了类似的分析。共有 58 名患者被纳入早期 PT 组群,47 名被纳入晚期 PT 组群。从人口统计学角度来看,早期 PT 组和晚期 PT 组的年龄相似(分别为 62.8 岁和 61.1 岁),且以女性为主(分别为 64.5% 和 67.6%)。两组患者的体重指数无明显差异,早期 PT 患者的平均体重指数为 30.7,晚期 PT 患者的平均体重指数为 31.2。虽然两组患者在术后两年的放射学参数和患者报告结果方面都有所改善,但两组患者的改善程度存在明显差异。早期矫形组在颈椎前凸(25.2% 对 14.2%)、T1 平均斜率(-5.6% 对 -2.6%)和 C2-C7 平均矢状垂线(-15.2% 对 -11.7%)方面的改善率相对较高。结论与术后超过6周开始进行康复训练的患者相比,接受3级或3级以上后路颈胸椎融合术并在术后6周或6周之前开始进行康复训练的患者在影像学和患者报告的疗效方面表现出更大的优势。本研究结果支持大多数无并发症的颈椎融合术后成年患者尽早开始颈部强化训练。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
48 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信