Buddhist Criticism of Justification of Varṇa System by Brahmanists. On the Russian Translation of Vajrasūcī. Vajrasūcī. Trans. from Sanskrit and Notes by Ruzana V. Pskhu

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY
Ruzana Pskhu
{"title":"Buddhist Criticism of Justification of Varṇa System by Brahmanists. On the Russian Translation of Vajrasūcī. Vajrasūcī. Trans. from Sanskrit and Notes by Ruzana V. Pskhu","authors":"Ruzana Pskhu","doi":"10.21146/0042-8744-2024-7-59-70","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the later period of the development of Indian philosophy (VII century), one of the most interesting questions marked the boundary of Brahmanic thought and its most categorical opponent, Buddhism: the question of the existence of universals. Despite the fact that at first glance this dispute seems purely philosophical and therefore comparable to a similar phenomenon in Western European philosophy, nevertheless, in the history of Indian philosophy, the problem of universals arises in a certain context, explaining their appearance as a ‘situational’ phenomenon. In the VII century, Kumārila Bhaṭṭa, in a dispute with the Buddhist Dharmakīrti, resorted to universals in justifying the legality of the Varṇa system: all brahmins are united by one common property or universal – brahmanism, due to which brahmins differ from all other people. We can talk about the existence of a certain paradigm in the Brahmin culture, which explains the social structure of ancient Indian society, and the affirmation by all philosophical systems of classical Indian philosophy, united by the name of āstika (recognizing the Vedas), and the grammatical structure of Sanskrit in Pāṇini’s work, and many other realities of Brahmin culture. The article examines the text of Vajrasūcī attributed to the early Buddhist author Aśvaghoṣa, in which a condensation of possible arguments against the Varṇa system and the exclusive status of the Brahmins is proposed. The article presents the translation of Vajrasūcī from Sanskrit into Russian.","PeriodicalId":46795,"journal":{"name":"VOPROSY FILOSOFII","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VOPROSY FILOSOFII","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2024-7-59-70","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the later period of the development of Indian philosophy (VII century), one of the most interesting questions marked the boundary of Brahmanic thought and its most categorical opponent, Buddhism: the question of the existence of universals. Despite the fact that at first glance this dispute seems purely philosophical and therefore comparable to a similar phenomenon in Western European philosophy, nevertheless, in the history of Indian philosophy, the problem of universals arises in a certain context, explaining their appearance as a ‘situational’ phenomenon. In the VII century, Kumārila Bhaṭṭa, in a dispute with the Buddhist Dharmakīrti, resorted to universals in justifying the legality of the Varṇa system: all brahmins are united by one common property or universal – brahmanism, due to which brahmins differ from all other people. We can talk about the existence of a certain paradigm in the Brahmin culture, which explains the social structure of ancient Indian society, and the affirmation by all philosophical systems of classical Indian philosophy, united by the name of āstika (recognizing the Vedas), and the grammatical structure of Sanskrit in Pāṇini’s work, and many other realities of Brahmin culture. The article examines the text of Vajrasūcī attributed to the early Buddhist author Aśvaghoṣa, in which a condensation of possible arguments against the Varṇa system and the exclusive status of the Brahmins is proposed. The article presents the translation of Vajrasūcī from Sanskrit into Russian.
佛教对婆罗门教徒为瓦尔纳体系辩护的批评。论《金刚经》俄译本。金刚经》。Ruzana V. Pskhu 译自梵文并作注释
在印度哲学发展的后期(七世纪),一个最有趣的问题标志着婆罗门思想与其最明确的对手--佛教--的界限:普遍性的存在问题。尽管乍看之下,这一争论似乎纯粹是哲学问题,因此可与西欧哲学中的类似现象相媲美,但在印度哲学史中,普遍性问题是在一定的背景下出现的,它将普遍性的出现解释为一种 "情景 "现象。公元七世纪,库马里拉-巴塔(Kumārila Bhaṭṭa)在与佛教徒达摩基尔提(Dharmakīrti)的争论中诉诸普遍性来证明瓦尔纳(Varṇa)制度的合法性:所有婆罗门都被一种共同的属性或普遍性--婆罗门教--团结在一起,由于这种属性或普遍性,婆罗门不同于其他人。我们可以谈论婆罗门文化中存在的某种范式,这种范式解释了古印度社会的社会结构,以及以 āstika(承认《吠陀》)之名联合起来的印度古典哲学的所有哲学体系的肯定,帕尼尼著作中的梵文语法结构,以及婆罗门文化的许多其他现实。文章研究了归于早期佛教作家 Aśvaghoṣa 的《金刚经》文本,其中提出了反对 Varṇa 系统和婆罗门专有地位的可能论点的浓缩。文章介绍了将《金刚经》从梵文翻译成俄文的过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
VOPROSY FILOSOFII
VOPROSY FILOSOFII PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
100
期刊介绍: "Вопросы философии" - академическое научное издание, центральный философский журнал в России. В настоящее время является органом Президиума Российской Академии Наук. Журнал "Вопросы философии" исторически тесно связан с Институтом философии РАН. Выходит ежемесячно. Журнал был основан в июле 1947 г. Интернет-версия журнала запущена в мае 2009 года.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信