{"title":"Neurosteroids as a possible new horizon in the treatment of fibromyalgia","authors":"Bruno Burlando, Ilaria Demori","doi":"10.1016/j.mehy.2024.111444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Fibromyalgia (FM) is a central chronic pain syndrome with fatigue, sleep disorders, and other symptoms. It has 1–5 % worldwide prevalence, 3:1 female-to-male ratio, and shows correlation with stress. The pathogenic mechanism is unknown, biomarkers are missing, and patient management is extremely difficult due to the lack of resolutive therapies. We developed a pathogenic model of FM based on a thalamocortical loop network that shifts from monostability to bistability for decreasing GABAergic and increasing glutamatergic transmission, leading to the appearance of a high-firing-rate steady state that represents FM altered central pain processing. Here, we propose the hypothesis that the pathogenic GABA/glutamate unbalance could be effectively counteracted by the use of neurosteroid drugs acting as positive allosteric modulators of both synaptic and extrasynaptic GABA<sub>A</sub> receptors. Our hypothesis is based on evidence suggesting the involvement of large fluctuations of gonadal neurosteroids (notably brain allopregnanolone withdrawal in perimenstrual/peripartum periods) and of adrenocortical hormones (notably cortisol rise during stress activation) in FM pathogenesis and in the regulation of central GABA/glutamate balance. Therefore, our hypothesis provides a link between FM clinical features (such as female prevalence and correlation with stress) and endocrine influences on neurotransmission, suggesting the use of neurosteroid drugs for the treatment of the disease.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18425,"journal":{"name":"Medical hypotheses","volume":"191 ","pages":"Article 111444"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical hypotheses","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306987724001877","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Fibromyalgia (FM) is a central chronic pain syndrome with fatigue, sleep disorders, and other symptoms. It has 1–5 % worldwide prevalence, 3:1 female-to-male ratio, and shows correlation with stress. The pathogenic mechanism is unknown, biomarkers are missing, and patient management is extremely difficult due to the lack of resolutive therapies. We developed a pathogenic model of FM based on a thalamocortical loop network that shifts from monostability to bistability for decreasing GABAergic and increasing glutamatergic transmission, leading to the appearance of a high-firing-rate steady state that represents FM altered central pain processing. Here, we propose the hypothesis that the pathogenic GABA/glutamate unbalance could be effectively counteracted by the use of neurosteroid drugs acting as positive allosteric modulators of both synaptic and extrasynaptic GABAA receptors. Our hypothesis is based on evidence suggesting the involvement of large fluctuations of gonadal neurosteroids (notably brain allopregnanolone withdrawal in perimenstrual/peripartum periods) and of adrenocortical hormones (notably cortisol rise during stress activation) in FM pathogenesis and in the regulation of central GABA/glutamate balance. Therefore, our hypothesis provides a link between FM clinical features (such as female prevalence and correlation with stress) and endocrine influences on neurotransmission, suggesting the use of neurosteroid drugs for the treatment of the disease.
期刊介绍:
Medical Hypotheses is a forum for ideas in medicine and related biomedical sciences. It will publish interesting and important theoretical papers that foster the diversity and debate upon which the scientific process thrives. The Aims and Scope of Medical Hypotheses are no different now from what was proposed by the founder of the journal, the late Dr David Horrobin. In his introduction to the first issue of the Journal, he asks ''what sorts of papers will be published in Medical Hypotheses? and goes on to answer ''Medical Hypotheses will publish papers which describe theories, ideas which have a great deal of observational support and some hypotheses where experimental support is yet fragmentary''. (Horrobin DF, 1975 Ideas in Biomedical Science: Reasons for the foundation of Medical Hypotheses. Medical Hypotheses Volume 1, Issue 1, January-February 1975, Pages 1-2.). Medical Hypotheses was therefore launched, and still exists today, to give novel, radical new ideas and speculations in medicine open-minded consideration, opening the field to radical hypotheses which would be rejected by most conventional journals. Papers in Medical Hypotheses take a standard scientific form in terms of style, structure and referencing. The journal therefore constitutes a bridge between cutting-edge theory and the mainstream of medical and scientific communication, which ideas must eventually enter if they are to be critiqued and tested against observations.