Pain during caesarean delivery in a tertiary maternity hospital: a retrospective cohort study (2022–2023)

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Ciara Luke, Lorcan O’ Carroll, Roger McMorrow
{"title":"Pain during caesarean delivery in a tertiary maternity hospital: a retrospective cohort study (2022–2023)","authors":"Ciara Luke,&nbsp;Lorcan O’ Carroll,&nbsp;Roger McMorrow","doi":"10.1016/j.ijoa.2024.104235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Intra-operative pain during Caesarean delivery (PDCD) is the leading cause of successful litigation against obstetric anaesthesiologists. PDCD may require conversion to general anaesthesia (GA). The aim of this analysis is to assess our incidence of PDCD and associated GA conversion.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Data were collected from electronic patient records. Data included baseline demographics, incidence of PDCD and rates of GA conversion, proportion of PDCD cases attributable to failed epidural (EA) or spinal anaesthesia (SA), and level of sensory and motor blockade in cases of PDCD. Results were audited against current standards set by the Royal College of Anaesthetists ‘rates of PDCD should be &lt;5% for category 4, &lt;15% for categories 2-3, and &lt;20 % for category 1 CD ’ and that ‘rates of conversion to GA due to neuraxial complications should be &lt;1% for category 4, &lt;5% for categories 2-3 and &lt;15% for category 1 patients’.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>During the 12-month study period, 2,429 patients underwent CD, of whom 52 (2.1%) experienced PDCD. The incidence of PDCD was 3.1% (41/1,309) for category 1-3 patients, while 1% (11/1,120) of category 4 patients experienced PDS. Of the 52 patients with PDCD, 17 patients required GA (33%). SA was used in 24/52 (47%) cases and EA in 28/52 (53%) cases. The median level of sensory block in patients with PDCD was located at the T4 dermatome, the median level of motor block was Bromage level 2.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>PDCD occurred in 2.1% of CD, one-third required conversion to GA. Most patients experiencing PDCD met current motor and sensory blockade criteria.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":14250,"journal":{"name":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959289X24002474","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Intra-operative pain during Caesarean delivery (PDCD) is the leading cause of successful litigation against obstetric anaesthesiologists. PDCD may require conversion to general anaesthesia (GA). The aim of this analysis is to assess our incidence of PDCD and associated GA conversion.

Methods

Data were collected from electronic patient records. Data included baseline demographics, incidence of PDCD and rates of GA conversion, proportion of PDCD cases attributable to failed epidural (EA) or spinal anaesthesia (SA), and level of sensory and motor blockade in cases of PDCD. Results were audited against current standards set by the Royal College of Anaesthetists ‘rates of PDCD should be <5% for category 4, <15% for categories 2-3, and <20 % for category 1 CD ’ and that ‘rates of conversion to GA due to neuraxial complications should be <1% for category 4, <5% for categories 2-3 and <15% for category 1 patients’.

Results

During the 12-month study period, 2,429 patients underwent CD, of whom 52 (2.1%) experienced PDCD. The incidence of PDCD was 3.1% (41/1,309) for category 1-3 patients, while 1% (11/1,120) of category 4 patients experienced PDS. Of the 52 patients with PDCD, 17 patients required GA (33%). SA was used in 24/52 (47%) cases and EA in 28/52 (53%) cases. The median level of sensory block in patients with PDCD was located at the T4 dermatome, the median level of motor block was Bromage level 2.

Conclusions

PDCD occurred in 2.1% of CD, one-third required conversion to GA. Most patients experiencing PDCD met current motor and sensory blockade criteria.

一家三级妇产医院剖腹产术中疼痛分析
背景剖腹产术中疼痛(PDCD)是导致产科麻醉医师胜诉的主要原因。PDCD可能需要转为全身麻醉(GA)。本分析旨在评估我们的 PDCD 发生率和相关的 GA 转换情况。数据包括基线人口统计学、PDCD 发生率和全身麻醉转换率、硬膜外麻醉(EA)或脊髓麻醉(SA)失败导致的 PDCD 病例比例,以及 PDCD 病例中的感觉和运动阻滞水平。根据英国皇家麻醉师学院制定的现行标准对结果进行了审核,该标准规定:"第 4 类患者的 PDCD 发生率应为 5%,第 2-3 类患者的 PDCD 发生率应为 15%,第 1 类患者的 PDCD 发生率应为 20%","因神经轴并发症而转为 GA 的发生率应为:第 4 类患者 1%,第 2-3 类患者 5%,第 1 类患者 15%"。1-3 类患者的 PDCD 发生率为 3.1%(41/1,309),而 1%(11/1,120)的 4 类患者经历了 PDS。在 52 名 PDCD 患者中,17 名患者需要进行 GA(33%)。24/52(47%)例患者使用了 SA,28/52(53%)例患者使用了 EA。PDCD 患者感觉阻滞的中位水平位于 T4 皮节,运动阻滞的中位水平为 Bromage 2 水平。大多数 PDCD 患者符合当前的运动和感觉阻滞标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.10%
发文量
285
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia is the only journal publishing original articles devoted exclusively to obstetric anesthesia and bringing together all three of its principal components; anesthesia care for operative delivery and the perioperative period, pain relief in labour and care of the critically ill obstetric patient. • Original research (both clinical and laboratory), short reports and case reports will be considered. • The journal also publishes invited review articles and debates on topical and controversial subjects in the area of obstetric anesthesia. • Articles on related topics such as perinatal physiology and pharmacology and all subjects of importance to obstetric anaesthetists/anesthesiologists are also welcome. The journal is peer-reviewed by international experts. Scholarship is stressed to include the focus on discovery, application of knowledge across fields, and informing the medical community. Through the peer-review process, we hope to attest to the quality of scholarships and guide the Journal to extend and transform knowledge in this important and expanding area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信