Using Electronic Health Record Mortality Data to Promote Goals-of-Care Discussions in Seriously Ill Transferred Patients: A Pilot Study

ACI open Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1788652
N. Mahendraker, Esmeralda Gutierrez-Asis, Seho Park, Linda S. Williams, Titus Schleyer, Elizabeth Umberfield
{"title":"Using Electronic Health Record Mortality Data to Promote Goals-of-Care Discussions in Seriously Ill Transferred Patients: A Pilot Study","authors":"N. Mahendraker, Esmeralda Gutierrez-Asis, Seho Park, Linda S. Williams, Titus Schleyer, Elizabeth Umberfield","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1788652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Background Mortality prediction data may aid in identifying seriously ill transferred patients at high risk of dying and facilitate early goals-of-care discussions (GOCD); however, this is rarely evaluated. We recently developed a model for predicting 30-day inpatient mortality, which may be useful for promoting early GOCD.\n Objectives Our objectives were to examine the effects of sharing model-generated mortality risk with hospitalists by assessing (1) if hospitalists agreed with the mortality risk prediction, (2) if they planned to conduct GOCD or consult palliative care within 72 hours of transfer, and (3) if the communication alert affected GOCD timing and other clinical outcomes. We also aimed to measure the association between both the model-generated and hospitalists' stratified risk assessments with patient mortality.\n Methods This was a nonrandomized quasi-experimental pilot study with a historical control group. On the second day of hospitalization, the model-generated risk was communicated to the hospitalists. Hospitalists were asked to answer questions via a HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act)-compliant mobile communication system, and clinical outcomes were extracted via chart review.\n Results Eighty-four patients (42 in the control and 42 in the intervention group) were included in this study. Hospitalists agreed that all patients in the intervention group were at risk for inpatient mortality. Hospitalists were more likely to indicate a plan to conduct GOCD in the intervention group (n = 9) compared with the control group (n = 4, p < 0.001). In this subset of patients, GOCD was completed within 72 hours in 78% of intervention patients (n = 7) as compared with 50% in the control group (n = 2). The greater absolute value of the model-generated mortality risk was significantly associated with deaths (p = 0.01), similar to the hospitalists' prediction of the mortality risk (p = 0.02).\n Conclusion Communicating model-generated mortality risk to hospitalists is a promising approach to promote timely GOCD.","PeriodicalId":72041,"journal":{"name":"ACI open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACI open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1788652","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Mortality prediction data may aid in identifying seriously ill transferred patients at high risk of dying and facilitate early goals-of-care discussions (GOCD); however, this is rarely evaluated. We recently developed a model for predicting 30-day inpatient mortality, which may be useful for promoting early GOCD. Objectives Our objectives were to examine the effects of sharing model-generated mortality risk with hospitalists by assessing (1) if hospitalists agreed with the mortality risk prediction, (2) if they planned to conduct GOCD or consult palliative care within 72 hours of transfer, and (3) if the communication alert affected GOCD timing and other clinical outcomes. We also aimed to measure the association between both the model-generated and hospitalists' stratified risk assessments with patient mortality. Methods This was a nonrandomized quasi-experimental pilot study with a historical control group. On the second day of hospitalization, the model-generated risk was communicated to the hospitalists. Hospitalists were asked to answer questions via a HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act)-compliant mobile communication system, and clinical outcomes were extracted via chart review. Results Eighty-four patients (42 in the control and 42 in the intervention group) were included in this study. Hospitalists agreed that all patients in the intervention group were at risk for inpatient mortality. Hospitalists were more likely to indicate a plan to conduct GOCD in the intervention group (n = 9) compared with the control group (n = 4, p < 0.001). In this subset of patients, GOCD was completed within 72 hours in 78% of intervention patients (n = 7) as compared with 50% in the control group (n = 2). The greater absolute value of the model-generated mortality risk was significantly associated with deaths (p = 0.01), similar to the hospitalists' prediction of the mortality risk (p = 0.02). Conclusion Communicating model-generated mortality risk to hospitalists is a promising approach to promote timely GOCD.
利用电子健康记录死亡率数据促进重症转院患者的护理目标讨论:试点研究
背景死亡率预测数据有助于识别死亡风险较高的重症转院患者,并促进早期护理目标讨论(GOCD);但这一点很少得到评估。我们最近开发了一个预测住院患者 30 天死亡率的模型,该模型可能有助于促进早期 GOCD。目标 我们的目标是通过评估(1)住院医生是否同意死亡率风险预测,(2)他们是否计划在转院后 72 小时内进行 GOCD 或姑息治疗咨询,以及(3)沟通警报是否会影响 GOCD 时机和其他临床结果,来研究与住院医生共享模型生成的死亡率风险的效果。我们还旨在测量模型生成的风险评估和住院医生的分层风险评估与患者死亡率之间的关联。方法 这是一项带有历史对照组的非随机准实验性试点研究。住院第二天,将模型生成的风险告知住院医生。住院医生被要求通过符合 HIPAA(健康保险可携性和责任法案)的移动通信系统回答问题,并通过病历审查提取临床结果。结果 84 名患者(42 名对照组患者和 42 名干预组患者)被纳入本研究。住院医生一致认为干预组的所有患者都有住院死亡风险。与对照组(4 人,P < 0.001)相比,干预组(9 人)的住院医生更有可能表示计划进行 GOCD。在这部分患者中,78% 的干预组患者(7 人)在 72 小时内完成了 GOCD,而对照组仅为 50%(2 人)。模型生成的死亡风险绝对值越大,死亡人数越多(p = 0.01),与住院医生预测的死亡风险相似(p = 0.02)。结论 将模型生成的死亡风险告知住院医生是促进及时进行 GOCD 的有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信