8. Intravenous infusion of auto serum-expanded autologous mesenchymal stem cells in chronic spinal cord injury patients: 7 case series

Q3 Medicine
{"title":"8. Intravenous infusion of auto serum-expanded autologous mesenchymal stem cells in chronic spinal cord injury patients: 7 case series","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>BACKGROUND CONTEXT</h3><p>In the chronic phase, functional recovery of spinal cord injury (SCI) without any therapeutic intervention is highly limited. Therefore, new treatments are desired to enhance residual function, with the important objection of increasing the quality of life in chronic SCI patients. Intravenous infusion of auto serum-expanded autologous bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) for acute SCI patients has shown the safety and potential therapeutic efficacy of this approach. However, the clinical use for the chronic phase of SCI has not been studied.</p></div><div><h3>PURPOSE</h3><p>This study explores safety, feasibility and potential improvement in functional status after intravenous infusion of MSCs in chronic severe SCI patients.</p></div><div><h3>STUDY DESIGN/SETTING</h3><p>We report a case series of 7 chronic SCI patients with AIS grades C and D who received autoserum-expanded autologous MSCs. Statistical analyses were performed using JMP 11.1 for Windows (SAS Institute Inc.). The differences between status prior to MSC infusion and 6 months postinfusion, for both ISCSCI-92 and SCIM-III among the groups were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance followed by Bonferroni's post hoc tests. Data are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean. Differences were considered statistically significant at p &lt; 0.05.</p></div><div><h3>PATIENT SAMPLE</h3><p>The patients included 5 men and 2 women who ranged 20 to 52 years old (mean 39.6 years old). After careful examination, 7 patients with chronic SCI were included in this study based on the following inclusion and exclusion criteria. Inclusion criteria: (1) 180 days or more after onset of SCI, (2) <strong>a</strong>ge at least 18 years old, (3) rehabilitation can be performed more than 4 units per day, (4) the written informed consent obtained as much as possible from subjects (<strong>i</strong>f the subject does not have ability to write, the written informed consent obtained from legal representative alone).</p></div><div><h3>OUTCOME MEASURES</h3><p>Each participant's status on SCI scales including American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale, International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISCSCI-92), and Spinal Cord Independence Measure-III (SCIM-III) was assessed from 0 to 14 days prior to MSC infusion, and at 90 (± 14) and 180 (± 14) days post-MSC infusion, by at least 2 board-certified orthopedic surgeons who were not blinded. The primary outcome measure of this clinical study was the proportion of cases whose ASIA scale improved one point or more at 180 ± 14 days post-MSC infusion compared to the functional status just prior to MSC infusion (0-14 days). All patients were monitored closely during and within 24 h of the autologous human MSC injections. Oxygen saturation, body temperature, electrocardiogram, blood pressure, pulse and respiratory rate were carefully monitored before and after injection. Chest films were obtained for each subject before and after autologous MSC infusion. At 6 months post MSC infusion, all participants underwent radiological examinations and routine blood/urine examinations to confirm the absence of any adverse effects.</p></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><p>We provided an extensive rehabilitation protocol to all participants prior to MSC infusion in order to exclude the potential effects of rehabilitation alone and evaluate MSC-specific effects. Briefly, all participant patients with chronic SCI received formal rehabilitation (at least 80 min/weekday for 4 weeks) and continue formal rehabilitation until they showed no further improvements in ISCSCI-92 scores (more than 2 points) for the last 2 weeks prior to MSC infusion. Thus, we expected to evaluate the therapeutic effects of MSC infusion in addition to the effects of rehabilitation therapy. If the patients required more than 2 weeks to reach an ISCSCI-92 score plateau, we continued formal rehabilitation until they showed no further improvement for the next 2 weeks.</p><p>For cell preparation, autologous human MSCs were prepared using previously described methods.</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><p>Seven patients ranging from 20 to 52 (average: 39.6 ± 5.0, median: 48) years and of both genders were studied. The autologous MSCs were intravenously infused between 1.3 to 18 years post-SCI. No serious adverse events were associated with cell injection. Anemia after peripheral blood collection (6 cases) and local pain at the bone marrow aspiration site immediately after bone marrow collection (1 case) were recorded as protocol-related adverse events (AE). However, all protocol-related AEs occurred before MSC infusion. Thus, there were no MSC-related AEs in this study. The time point of last assessment post-MSC infusion in this study was approximately 180 days after MSC infusion. One of 2 patients classified as AIS C prior to MSC improved to AIS D at 6 months post-MSC infusion. All AIS D participants (n=5) did not change the AIS grade 6 months after MSC infusion. The patients displayed gradual increases in motor scores with statistical significance at 90 and 180 days post-MSC infusion compared to before MSC infusions. Furthermore, the motor score at 180 days post-MSC infusion was higher than at 90 days post-MSC infusion as well. Sensory scores are shown before MSC infusion, at 90 and 180 days post-MSC infusion. The patients also exhibited gradual increases in SCIM scores with statistical significance at 90 and 180 days post-MSC infusion compared to before MSC infusions. The individual changes are shown in ISCSCI-92 scores, including motor and sensory scores and SCIM-III scores, in ASIA C and ASIA D patients before MSC infusion and 180 days post-MSC infusion. Motor and sensory functions at 6 months (± 14 days) showed higher points compared to scores prior to MSC infusion in all patients. In ASIA D, Motor and sensory scores at 6 months (± 14 days) showed higher points compared to scores prior to MSC infusion in all patients except one patient. In SCIM-III, the total scores at 6 months (± 14 days) are higher compared to the scores prior to MSC infusion in all patients in all groups.</p></div><div><h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3><p>We report the detailed clinical record of infused autologous, auto-serum expanded MSCs in 7 chronic SCI patients. Our observations support safety, feasibility, and provide initial data that suggests potential functional improvements following MSC infusion. This case series underscores the importance of a future large-scale controlled clinical study in chronic SCI patients to determine efficacy.</p></div><div><h3>FDA Device/Drug Status</h3><p>This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34622,"journal":{"name":"North American Spine Society Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666548424000398/pdfft?md5=382142ddea8145cd320e79a6c37a887e&pid=1-s2.0-S2666548424000398-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North American Spine Society Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666548424000398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

In the chronic phase, functional recovery of spinal cord injury (SCI) without any therapeutic intervention is highly limited. Therefore, new treatments are desired to enhance residual function, with the important objection of increasing the quality of life in chronic SCI patients. Intravenous infusion of auto serum-expanded autologous bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) for acute SCI patients has shown the safety and potential therapeutic efficacy of this approach. However, the clinical use for the chronic phase of SCI has not been studied.

PURPOSE

This study explores safety, feasibility and potential improvement in functional status after intravenous infusion of MSCs in chronic severe SCI patients.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

We report a case series of 7 chronic SCI patients with AIS grades C and D who received autoserum-expanded autologous MSCs. Statistical analyses were performed using JMP 11.1 for Windows (SAS Institute Inc.). The differences between status prior to MSC infusion and 6 months postinfusion, for both ISCSCI-92 and SCIM-III among the groups were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance followed by Bonferroni's post hoc tests. Data are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean. Differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05.

PATIENT SAMPLE

The patients included 5 men and 2 women who ranged 20 to 52 years old (mean 39.6 years old). After careful examination, 7 patients with chronic SCI were included in this study based on the following inclusion and exclusion criteria. Inclusion criteria: (1) 180 days or more after onset of SCI, (2) age at least 18 years old, (3) rehabilitation can be performed more than 4 units per day, (4) the written informed consent obtained as much as possible from subjects (if the subject does not have ability to write, the written informed consent obtained from legal representative alone).

OUTCOME MEASURES

Each participant's status on SCI scales including American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale, International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISCSCI-92), and Spinal Cord Independence Measure-III (SCIM-III) was assessed from 0 to 14 days prior to MSC infusion, and at 90 (± 14) and 180 (± 14) days post-MSC infusion, by at least 2 board-certified orthopedic surgeons who were not blinded. The primary outcome measure of this clinical study was the proportion of cases whose ASIA scale improved one point or more at 180 ± 14 days post-MSC infusion compared to the functional status just prior to MSC infusion (0-14 days). All patients were monitored closely during and within 24 h of the autologous human MSC injections. Oxygen saturation, body temperature, electrocardiogram, blood pressure, pulse and respiratory rate were carefully monitored before and after injection. Chest films were obtained for each subject before and after autologous MSC infusion. At 6 months post MSC infusion, all participants underwent radiological examinations and routine blood/urine examinations to confirm the absence of any adverse effects.

METHODS

We provided an extensive rehabilitation protocol to all participants prior to MSC infusion in order to exclude the potential effects of rehabilitation alone and evaluate MSC-specific effects. Briefly, all participant patients with chronic SCI received formal rehabilitation (at least 80 min/weekday for 4 weeks) and continue formal rehabilitation until they showed no further improvements in ISCSCI-92 scores (more than 2 points) for the last 2 weeks prior to MSC infusion. Thus, we expected to evaluate the therapeutic effects of MSC infusion in addition to the effects of rehabilitation therapy. If the patients required more than 2 weeks to reach an ISCSCI-92 score plateau, we continued formal rehabilitation until they showed no further improvement for the next 2 weeks.

For cell preparation, autologous human MSCs were prepared using previously described methods.

RESULTS

Seven patients ranging from 20 to 52 (average: 39.6 ± 5.0, median: 48) years and of both genders were studied. The autologous MSCs were intravenously infused between 1.3 to 18 years post-SCI. No serious adverse events were associated with cell injection. Anemia after peripheral blood collection (6 cases) and local pain at the bone marrow aspiration site immediately after bone marrow collection (1 case) were recorded as protocol-related adverse events (AE). However, all protocol-related AEs occurred before MSC infusion. Thus, there were no MSC-related AEs in this study. The time point of last assessment post-MSC infusion in this study was approximately 180 days after MSC infusion. One of 2 patients classified as AIS C prior to MSC improved to AIS D at 6 months post-MSC infusion. All AIS D participants (n=5) did not change the AIS grade 6 months after MSC infusion. The patients displayed gradual increases in motor scores with statistical significance at 90 and 180 days post-MSC infusion compared to before MSC infusions. Furthermore, the motor score at 180 days post-MSC infusion was higher than at 90 days post-MSC infusion as well. Sensory scores are shown before MSC infusion, at 90 and 180 days post-MSC infusion. The patients also exhibited gradual increases in SCIM scores with statistical significance at 90 and 180 days post-MSC infusion compared to before MSC infusions. The individual changes are shown in ISCSCI-92 scores, including motor and sensory scores and SCIM-III scores, in ASIA C and ASIA D patients before MSC infusion and 180 days post-MSC infusion. Motor and sensory functions at 6 months (± 14 days) showed higher points compared to scores prior to MSC infusion in all patients. In ASIA D, Motor and sensory scores at 6 months (± 14 days) showed higher points compared to scores prior to MSC infusion in all patients except one patient. In SCIM-III, the total scores at 6 months (± 14 days) are higher compared to the scores prior to MSC infusion in all patients in all groups.

CONCLUSIONS

We report the detailed clinical record of infused autologous, auto-serum expanded MSCs in 7 chronic SCI patients. Our observations support safety, feasibility, and provide initial data that suggests potential functional improvements following MSC infusion. This case series underscores the importance of a future large-scale controlled clinical study in chronic SCI patients to determine efficacy.

FDA Device/Drug Status

This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.

8.慢性脊髓损伤患者静脉输注自体血清扩增的自体间充质干细胞:7 个病例系列
与输注间充质干细胞前相比,患者在输注间充质干细胞后90天和180天的运动评分逐渐增加,并具有统计学意义。此外,输注间充质干细胞后 180 天的运动评分也高于输注间充质干细胞后 90 天的评分。输注间充质干细胞前、输注间充质干细胞后 90 天和 180 天的感官评分。与输注间充质干细胞前相比,患者在输注间充质干细胞后 90 天和 180 天的 SCIM 评分也逐渐增加,并具有统计学意义。ASIA C 和 ASIA D 患者在输注间充质干细胞前和输注间充质干细胞后 180 天的 ISCSCI-92 评分(包括运动和感觉评分以及 SCIM-III 评分)的个体变化如图所示。与输注间充质干细胞前的评分相比,所有患者在6个月(± 14天)时的运动和感觉功能评分均有所提高。在 ASIA D 中,除一名患者外,所有患者在 6 个月(± 14 天)时的运动和感觉评分均高于输注间充质干细胞前的评分。在 SCIM-III 中,所有组别所有患者 6 个月(± 14 天)的总评分均高于输注间充质干细胞前的评分。我们的观察结果支持其安全性和可行性,并提供了初步数据,表明输注间充质干细胞后可能会改善患者的功能。本系列病例强调了未来在慢性 SCI 患者中开展大规模对照临床研究以确定疗效的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
48 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信