{"title":"Assessment of joint position sense in active and passive modes with various elbow flexion angles and movement speeds using an isokinetic dynamometer","authors":"Yi-Jung Tsai , Ting-Chien Tsai , Tzu-Chun Chung , Chih-Kun Hsiao , Yuan-Kun Tu","doi":"10.1016/j.msksp.2024.103153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Joint position sense is the ability to detect body segment position in space and is commonly used to represent proprioceptive performance. The isokinetic dynamometer is frequently used to evaluate elbow joint position sense during active and passive reproduction tasks with various testing protocols. However, few studies have reported the performance of joint position sense under different testing conditions.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To compare elbow joint position sense between active and passive reproduction tasks under different matching speeds and reference targets.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A cross-sectional study.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Twenty participants without a history of upper-extremity surgery or neuromuscular diseases that affect the joint position sense of the elbow. Active and passive ipsilateral matching tasks were performed at four movement speeds (0.5°/s, 1°/s, 2°/s, and 4°/s) and three reference targets (elbow flexion at 0°–15°, 45°–60°, and 75°–90°), using an isokinetic dynamometer. The absolute and variable errors of each condition were calculated for comparison.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In active matching task with elbow flexion of 0°–15°, the absolute error at 0.5°/s was significantly larger than that at 2°/s and 4°/s, while the variable error at 1°/s was significantly larger than that at 2°/s. However, no differences were found at elbow flexion angles of 45°–60° and 75°–90°. Larger absolute errors were found at 4°/s with three testing angles in passive matching task.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study compared the joint position sense errors under various testing conditions in the active and passive reproduction tasks. The movement speeds and target position effects should be considered during evaluation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56036,"journal":{"name":"Musculoskeletal Science and Practice","volume":"73 ","pages":"Article 103153"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Musculoskeletal Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468781224002480","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Joint position sense is the ability to detect body segment position in space and is commonly used to represent proprioceptive performance. The isokinetic dynamometer is frequently used to evaluate elbow joint position sense during active and passive reproduction tasks with various testing protocols. However, few studies have reported the performance of joint position sense under different testing conditions.
Objective
To compare elbow joint position sense between active and passive reproduction tasks under different matching speeds and reference targets.
Design
A cross-sectional study.
Methods
Twenty participants without a history of upper-extremity surgery or neuromuscular diseases that affect the joint position sense of the elbow. Active and passive ipsilateral matching tasks were performed at four movement speeds (0.5°/s, 1°/s, 2°/s, and 4°/s) and three reference targets (elbow flexion at 0°–15°, 45°–60°, and 75°–90°), using an isokinetic dynamometer. The absolute and variable errors of each condition were calculated for comparison.
Results
In active matching task with elbow flexion of 0°–15°, the absolute error at 0.5°/s was significantly larger than that at 2°/s and 4°/s, while the variable error at 1°/s was significantly larger than that at 2°/s. However, no differences were found at elbow flexion angles of 45°–60° and 75°–90°. Larger absolute errors were found at 4°/s with three testing angles in passive matching task.
Conclusions
This study compared the joint position sense errors under various testing conditions in the active and passive reproduction tasks. The movement speeds and target position effects should be considered during evaluation.
期刊介绍:
Musculoskeletal Science & Practice, international journal of musculoskeletal physiotherapy, is a peer-reviewed international journal (previously Manual Therapy), publishing high quality original research, review and Masterclass articles that contribute to improving the clinical understanding of appropriate care processes for musculoskeletal disorders. The journal publishes articles that influence or add to the body of evidence on diagnostic and therapeutic processes, patient centered care, guidelines for musculoskeletal therapeutics and theoretical models that support developments in assessment, diagnosis, clinical reasoning and interventions.