Development of a Resource for Health Professionals to Raise Advance Care Planning Topics During Kidney Care Consultations: A Multiple User-Centered Design

IF 3.2 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Anna Winterbottom , Helen Hurst , Fliss E.M. Murtagh , Hilary L. Bekker , Paula Ormandy , Barnaby Hole , Lynne Russon , Emma Murphy , Keith Bucknall , Andrew Mooney
{"title":"Development of a Resource for Health Professionals to Raise Advance Care Planning Topics During Kidney Care Consultations: A Multiple User-Centered Design","authors":"Anna Winterbottom ,&nbsp;Helen Hurst ,&nbsp;Fliss E.M. Murtagh ,&nbsp;Hilary L. Bekker ,&nbsp;Paula Ormandy ,&nbsp;Barnaby Hole ,&nbsp;Lynne Russon ,&nbsp;Emma Murphy ,&nbsp;Keith Bucknall ,&nbsp;Andrew Mooney","doi":"10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Rationale &amp; Objective</h3><p>Planning and delivering treatment pathways that integrate end-of-life care, frailty assessment, and enhanced supportive care is a service priority. Despite this, people with kidney failure are less likely to have an advance care plan and receive hospice and palliative care compared with other chronic illness populations. This is linked to health professionals feeling unskilled initiating conversations around future treatment and care options. This article describes research underpinning the development of a guide for kidney health professionals discussing end-of-life and advance care planning options with people with kidney failure and family members.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><p>The study comprised 2 parts: an initial cross-sectional qualitative approach using in-depth interviews with older adults with kidney failure and (bereaved) carers followed by resource development with input from multiple stakeholders.</p></div><div><h3>Setting &amp; Participants</h3><p>Older adults with kidney failure and (bereaved) carers recruited from 2 renal units in the North of England and by online advertisements with national United Kingdom-based kidney patient charities. Resource development included input from co-applicants, independent advisory committee, patient and public involvement team, multidisciplinary health professionals and academics in the United Kingdom and Denmark.</p></div><div><h3>Analytical Approach</h3><p>Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty-seven people were interviewed: older adults with kidney failure (n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->18), carers (n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->5), bereaved carers (n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->4). Five themes are described: the context within which end-of-life conversations take place, preferences for end-of-life treatment and care, family members’ role and needs in supporting people with kidney failure at the end-of-life, expectations and experience of dialysis treatment, and beliefs and experiences of death and dying.</p></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><p>Participants were mainly White, British, and receiving hemodialysis.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>People with (lived) experience of kidney failure informed a guide which aims to build on health professionals existing skills and improve confidence having conversations about future treatment and care. Kidney teams have expressed interest implementing the guide in practice and within their broader communications training packages.</p></div><div><h3>Plain-Language Summary</h3><p>Delivering treatment pathways integrating end-of-life care, frailty assessment, and enhanced supportive care is a service priority. Despite this, people with kidney failure are less likely to have an advance care plan and receive hospice and palliative care compared with other chronic illness populations. This article describes how people with (lived) experience of kidney failure informed a guide to build on health professionals existing skills and improve confidence having conversations about future treatment and care. The study comprised 2 parts: cross-sectional qualitative approach using in-depth interviews with older adults with kidney failure and (bereaved) carers followed by resource development with input from coapplicants, an independent advisory committee, a patient and public involvement team, multidisciplinary health professionals, and academics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17885,"journal":{"name":"Kidney Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590059524000852/pdfft?md5=2a9b9e5b93da61b841531a122abccfd9&pid=1-s2.0-S2590059524000852-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590059524000852","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale & Objective

Planning and delivering treatment pathways that integrate end-of-life care, frailty assessment, and enhanced supportive care is a service priority. Despite this, people with kidney failure are less likely to have an advance care plan and receive hospice and palliative care compared with other chronic illness populations. This is linked to health professionals feeling unskilled initiating conversations around future treatment and care options. This article describes research underpinning the development of a guide for kidney health professionals discussing end-of-life and advance care planning options with people with kidney failure and family members.

Study Design

The study comprised 2 parts: an initial cross-sectional qualitative approach using in-depth interviews with older adults with kidney failure and (bereaved) carers followed by resource development with input from multiple stakeholders.

Setting & Participants

Older adults with kidney failure and (bereaved) carers recruited from 2 renal units in the North of England and by online advertisements with national United Kingdom-based kidney patient charities. Resource development included input from co-applicants, independent advisory committee, patient and public involvement team, multidisciplinary health professionals and academics in the United Kingdom and Denmark.

Analytical Approach

Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data.

Results

Twenty-seven people were interviewed: older adults with kidney failure (n = 18), carers (n = 5), bereaved carers (n = 4). Five themes are described: the context within which end-of-life conversations take place, preferences for end-of-life treatment and care, family members’ role and needs in supporting people with kidney failure at the end-of-life, expectations and experience of dialysis treatment, and beliefs and experiences of death and dying.

Limitations

Participants were mainly White, British, and receiving hemodialysis.

Conclusions

People with (lived) experience of kidney failure informed a guide which aims to build on health professionals existing skills and improve confidence having conversations about future treatment and care. Kidney teams have expressed interest implementing the guide in practice and within their broader communications training packages.

Plain-Language Summary

Delivering treatment pathways integrating end-of-life care, frailty assessment, and enhanced supportive care is a service priority. Despite this, people with kidney failure are less likely to have an advance care plan and receive hospice and palliative care compared with other chronic illness populations. This article describes how people with (lived) experience of kidney failure informed a guide to build on health professionals existing skills and improve confidence having conversations about future treatment and care. The study comprised 2 parts: cross-sectional qualitative approach using in-depth interviews with older adults with kidney failure and (bereaved) carers followed by resource development with input from coapplicants, an independent advisory committee, a patient and public involvement team, multidisciplinary health professionals, and academics.

为医护人员开发资源,以便在肾脏护理咨询过程中提出预先护理计划话题:以用户为中心的多重设计
理由& 目标规划和提供整合临终关怀、虚弱评估和强化支持性护理的治疗路径是一项优先服务。尽管如此,与其他慢性病患者相比,肾衰竭患者制定预后护理计划以及接受临终关怀和姑息治疗的可能性较低。这与医护人员在就未来治疗和护理方案展开对话时感到缺乏技巧有关。本文介绍了肾脏健康专业人员在与肾衰竭患者及其家人讨论临终关怀和预先护理计划选择时所依据的指南开发研究。研究设计该研究由两部分组成:最初采用横断面定性方法,对肾衰竭老年人和(失去亲人的)照护者进行深入访谈,随后根据多方利益相关者的意见进行资源开发。环境和ampamp; 参与者从英格兰北部的两家肾脏病医院以及英国全国肾脏病慈善机构的在线广告中招募患有肾衰竭的老年人和(失去亲人的)照护者。资源开发包括来自英国和丹麦的共同申请者、独立咨询委员会、患者和公众参与团队、多学科医疗专业人士和学者的意见。分析方法采用专题分析法对数据进行分析。结果对 27 人进行了访谈:患有肾衰竭的老年人(18 人)、照护者(5 人)、失去亲人的照护者(4 人)。对五个主题进行了描述:进行临终对话的背景、对临终治疗和护理的偏好、家庭成员在支持肾衰竭患者临终方面的角色和需求、对透析治疗的期望和体验以及对死亡和临终的信念和体验。结论有肾衰竭(生活)经验的人为指南提供了信息,该指南旨在加强医疗专业人员的现有技能,提高他们就未来治疗和护理进行对话的信心。肾脏团队已表示有兴趣在实践中实施该指南,并将其纳入更广泛的沟通培训包中。尽管如此,与其他慢性病患者相比,肾衰竭患者制定预先护理计划以及接受临终关怀和姑息治疗的可能性较低。本文介绍了肾衰竭患者(生活)经验如何为指南提供信息,以加强医疗专业人员的现有技能,并提高他们就未来治疗和护理进行对话的信心。该研究由两部分组成:采用横断面定性方法,对患有肾衰竭的老年人和(失去亲人的)照护者进行深入访谈,然后根据共同申请者、独立咨询委员会、患者和公众参与团队、多学科医疗专业人士及学者的意见进行资源开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Kidney Medicine
Kidney Medicine Medicine-Internal Medicine
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.10%
发文量
176
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信