Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Multiple Myeloma: A Call to Action

Rebecca Lu, MSN, FNP-C, Joseph D. Tariman, PhD, MBA, ANP-BC, FAAN, Donna Catamero, ANP-BC, OCN, CCRC, Michaela Hillengass, RN, CPT, ACSM, Kimberly Noonan, DNP, ANP-BC, AOCN
{"title":"Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Multiple Myeloma: A Call to Action","authors":"Rebecca Lu, MSN, FNP-C, Joseph D. Tariman, PhD, MBA, ANP-BC, FAAN, Donna Catamero, ANP-BC, OCN, CCRC, Michaela Hillengass, RN, CPT, ACSM, Kimberly Noonan, DNP, ANP-BC, AOCN","doi":"10.6004/jadpro.2024.15.8.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Although advancements in multiple myeloma therapy have rapidly evolved, pervasive racial and social inequities prevent uniform benefit across diverse patient populations. This affects access to US Food and Drug Administration–approved treatments and to clinical studies. The impact of health-care inequities is not well understood and thus, the development of effective strategies is inadequate. We identify different disparities including race, age, socioeconomic status, and sexual preference/orientation and their effect on patient care. We explore recommendations for the advanced practitioner to overcome underrepresentation and increase access in myeloma care. Method: We performed a literature review using online databases including PubMed and CINAHL to identify different disparities, barriers to clinical studies, and recommendations to improve access. The following terms were used to identify the most relevant articles: myeloma, bias, diversity, racial disparity, inequity, socioeconomic factors, trial, elderly, sexual orientation, and sexual preference. Findings: Racial and socioeconomic inequities largely affect the survival and quality of care available to underrepresented populations as well as elderly patients. Existing inequities negatively affect study enrollment leading to real world consequences. Structural, clinical, and attitudinal factors further compound the issue of equitable trial engagement. Current recommendations for the advanced practitioner include addressing systemic issues to increase understanding of inequities to mitigate socioeconomic factors that deter equitable access. Conclusion: Understanding the issue of inequities is vital in ensuring myeloma patients are provided appropriate care. Recommendations are rooted in education and improving treatment access. Illuminating the issues of treatment disparities can remove barriers to ensure a more equitable future.","PeriodicalId":17176,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Advanced Practitioner in Oncology","volume":"347 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Advanced Practitioner in Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6004/jadpro.2024.15.8.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although advancements in multiple myeloma therapy have rapidly evolved, pervasive racial and social inequities prevent uniform benefit across diverse patient populations. This affects access to US Food and Drug Administration–approved treatments and to clinical studies. The impact of health-care inequities is not well understood and thus, the development of effective strategies is inadequate. We identify different disparities including race, age, socioeconomic status, and sexual preference/orientation and their effect on patient care. We explore recommendations for the advanced practitioner to overcome underrepresentation and increase access in myeloma care. Method: We performed a literature review using online databases including PubMed and CINAHL to identify different disparities, barriers to clinical studies, and recommendations to improve access. The following terms were used to identify the most relevant articles: myeloma, bias, diversity, racial disparity, inequity, socioeconomic factors, trial, elderly, sexual orientation, and sexual preference. Findings: Racial and socioeconomic inequities largely affect the survival and quality of care available to underrepresented populations as well as elderly patients. Existing inequities negatively affect study enrollment leading to real world consequences. Structural, clinical, and attitudinal factors further compound the issue of equitable trial engagement. Current recommendations for the advanced practitioner include addressing systemic issues to increase understanding of inequities to mitigate socioeconomic factors that deter equitable access. Conclusion: Understanding the issue of inequities is vital in ensuring myeloma patients are provided appropriate care. Recommendations are rooted in education and improving treatment access. Illuminating the issues of treatment disparities can remove barriers to ensure a more equitable future.
多发性骨髓瘤的多样性、公平性和包容性:行动呼吁
背景:虽然多发性骨髓瘤的治疗技术发展迅速,但普遍存在的种族和社会不平等现象阻碍了不同患者群体获得一致的治疗效果。这影响了美国食品和药物管理局批准的治疗方法和临床研究的获得。人们对医疗不平等的影响还不甚了解,因此无法制定有效的策略。我们确定了包括种族、年龄、社会经济地位和性偏好/取向在内的不同差异及其对患者护理的影响。我们探讨了对高级医师的建议,以克服代表性不足的问题并增加骨髓瘤护理的可及性。方法:我们使用在线数据库(包括 PubMed 和 CINAHL)进行了文献综述,以确定不同的差异、临床研究的障碍以及改善就诊的建议。我们使用了以下术语来识别最相关的文章:骨髓瘤、偏见、多样性、种族差异、不公平、社会经济因素、试验、老年人、性取向和性偏好。研究结果种族和社会经济不平等在很大程度上影响了代表性不足人群以及老年患者的生存和医疗质量。现有的不平等现象对研究注册产生了负面影响,导致了现实世界的后果。结构、临床和态度因素进一步加剧了公平参与试验的问题。目前对高级执业医师的建议包括解决系统性问题,增加对不公平现象的了解,以减轻阻碍公平参与的社会经济因素。结论:了解不公平问题对于确保骨髓瘤患者获得适当的治疗至关重要。建议的根本在于教育和改善治疗机会。阐明治疗差异问题可以消除障碍,确保未来更加公平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信