{"title":"Anaesthetic management of obstetric patients with Chiari type I malformation: a retrospective case series and literature review","authors":"A. Simpson , C. Ferguson","doi":"10.1016/j.ijoa.2024.104232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The peripartum management of obstetric patients with Chiari type I malformation remains a challenge due to the degree of cerebellar tonsillar herniation and a paucity of published evidence. There is concern about neuraxial anaesthetic blocks and uncertainty regarding the optimum mode of delivery.</p><p>We systematically searched the literature for the obstetric management of patients with Chiari type I malformation, independent of publication date and language. We also searched our local hospital database from December 2009 to December 2022 for all deliveries to patients with this condition. We identified 137 cases comprising 103 deliveries described in 40 publications that met our inclusion criteria; 34 deliveries were identified in our local database. There were 84 spontaneous vaginal deliveries, 52 caesarean deliveries, and one delivery by unknown modality. Sixty neuraxial blocks were performed; approximately half of these were epidural procedures for labour analgesia. Six patients had new or worsened symptoms following delivery, but it is unclear whether these were related to their Chiari malformation. We identified no cases with brainstem herniation or severe symptoms.</p><p>We discuss our findings in relation to other published literature and address the concerns described. Our review reveals the use of a variety of modes of delivery and anaesthetic techniques and that most patients suffered no neurological complication. We conclude there is no of evidence to avoid any one approach to labour analgesia, delivery and anaesthesia. We propose a holistic, individualised and patient-centred approach with an appraisal of the risks and benefits to support shared-decision making.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":14250,"journal":{"name":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959289X24002449","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The peripartum management of obstetric patients with Chiari type I malformation remains a challenge due to the degree of cerebellar tonsillar herniation and a paucity of published evidence. There is concern about neuraxial anaesthetic blocks and uncertainty regarding the optimum mode of delivery.
We systematically searched the literature for the obstetric management of patients with Chiari type I malformation, independent of publication date and language. We also searched our local hospital database from December 2009 to December 2022 for all deliveries to patients with this condition. We identified 137 cases comprising 103 deliveries described in 40 publications that met our inclusion criteria; 34 deliveries were identified in our local database. There were 84 spontaneous vaginal deliveries, 52 caesarean deliveries, and one delivery by unknown modality. Sixty neuraxial blocks were performed; approximately half of these were epidural procedures for labour analgesia. Six patients had new or worsened symptoms following delivery, but it is unclear whether these were related to their Chiari malformation. We identified no cases with brainstem herniation or severe symptoms.
We discuss our findings in relation to other published literature and address the concerns described. Our review reveals the use of a variety of modes of delivery and anaesthetic techniques and that most patients suffered no neurological complication. We conclude there is no of evidence to avoid any one approach to labour analgesia, delivery and anaesthesia. We propose a holistic, individualised and patient-centred approach with an appraisal of the risks and benefits to support shared-decision making.
期刊介绍：
The International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia is the only journal publishing original articles devoted exclusively to obstetric anesthesia and bringing together all three of its principal components; anesthesia care for operative delivery and the perioperative period, pain relief in labour and care of the critically ill obstetric patient.
• Original research (both clinical and laboratory), short reports and case reports will be considered.
• The journal also publishes invited review articles and debates on topical and controversial subjects in the area of obstetric anesthesia.
• Articles on related topics such as perinatal physiology and pharmacology and all subjects of importance to obstetric anaesthetists/anesthesiologists are also welcome.
The journal is peer-reviewed by international experts. Scholarship is stressed to include the focus on discovery, application of knowledge across fields, and informing the medical community. Through the peer-review process, we hope to attest to the quality of scholarships and guide the Journal to extend and transform knowledge in this important and expanding area.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
