Learning to Think Like an Anthropologist? Toward Understanding Student Acquisition of Anthropological Perspectives in Online vs. Face-to-Face Anthropology of Education Courses

Diane Hoffman, David Saavedra, Tsehuajab Washul, Christof Fehrman
{"title":"Learning to Think Like an Anthropologist? Toward Understanding Student Acquisition of Anthropological Perspectives in Online vs. Face-to-Face Anthropology of Education Courses","authors":"Diane Hoffman, David Saavedra, Tsehuajab Washul, Christof Fehrman","doi":"10.22582/ta.v13i1.710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, online approaches to teaching anthropology have become popular in higher education.  In this exploratory account, we consider how student understanding of anthropological ideas differed in online vs. face-to-face modalities of an anthropology of education course.  Through content analysis of student essays and discussion posts over 8 semesters of the course as it was delivered in both formats, we considered patterns in students’ conceptual responses to anthropological ideas. Our analysis revealed differences in student conceptual engagement, with greater acquisition and understanding of anthropological perspectives in the face-to-face course than in the online course. Drawing from recent work in the anthropology of learning that emphasizes interactional and social dimensions of learning, we suggest that a possible explanation for these differences lies in features of the interaction environment in each course. Our study points to ways in which the fine-grained study of online course environments through analysis of student writing may offer significant insights into improving teaching of anthropology in such contexts more generally.  ","PeriodicalId":407748,"journal":{"name":"Teaching Anthropology","volume":"16 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22582/ta.v13i1.710","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, online approaches to teaching anthropology have become popular in higher education.  In this exploratory account, we consider how student understanding of anthropological ideas differed in online vs. face-to-face modalities of an anthropology of education course.  Through content analysis of student essays and discussion posts over 8 semesters of the course as it was delivered in both formats, we considered patterns in students’ conceptual responses to anthropological ideas. Our analysis revealed differences in student conceptual engagement, with greater acquisition and understanding of anthropological perspectives in the face-to-face course than in the online course. Drawing from recent work in the anthropology of learning that emphasizes interactional and social dimensions of learning, we suggest that a possible explanation for these differences lies in features of the interaction environment in each course. Our study points to ways in which the fine-grained study of online course environments through analysis of student writing may offer significant insights into improving teaching of anthropology in such contexts more generally.  
学会像人类学家那样思考?了解学生在在线与面授教育人类学课程中获得的人类学视角
近年来,在线人类学教学方法在高等教育中开始流行。 在这篇探索性文章中,我们探讨了在教育人类学课程中,学生对人类学思想的理解在网络教学与面对面教学模式下有何不同。 通过对 8 个学期中以这两种形式授课的学生论文和讨论帖子的内容分析,我们研究了学生对人类学思想的概念反应模式。我们的分析揭示了学生在概念参与方面的差异,与在线课程相比,面授课程中学生对人类学观点的掌握和理解程度更高。学习人类学的最新研究强调学习的互动和社会维度,我们借鉴了这一研究成果,认为造成这些差异的可能原因在于每门课程中互动环境的特点。我们的研究指出,通过分析学生的写作对在线课程环境进行精细研究,可能会为在更广泛的情况下改进人类学教学提供重要启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信