The Twin Styles in 19th Century: Stereotyping Rossini and Beethoven

Cheng Wen
{"title":"The Twin Styles in 19th Century: Stereotyping Rossini and Beethoven","authors":"Cheng Wen","doi":"10.54097/n1ntm446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the 19th century, Dahlhaus’s \"twin styles\" compared Rossini and Beethoven as representatives of Italy and Germany. He believes that the Italian opera represented by Rossini is superficial, while the German opera represented by Beethoven is profound. Over time, this contrasting relationship gave rise to stereotypes and gradually evolved into a broader contrast between the cultures and arts of Italy and Germany. This article aims to address this issue by examining Rossini's representative opera \"L'italiana in Algeri,\" focusing on the aria \"Languir per una bella,\" and analyzing the recitative \"Gott! Welch Dunkel hier!\" and \"In des Lebens Frühlingstagen\" from Beethoven's opera \"Fidelio.\" The analysis will explore three aspects of vocal performance, examining the differences in opera composition between Rossini and Beethoven from the perspective of the singer. Furthermore, it will discuss the contrasting perceptions of Rossini and Beethoven as reflected in the \"twin styles\" stereotype. Employing dialectical thinking, the article will compare the works of Rossini and Beethoven and offer unique insights form a vocalist.","PeriodicalId":346834,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences","volume":"29 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54097/n1ntm446","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the 19th century, Dahlhaus’s "twin styles" compared Rossini and Beethoven as representatives of Italy and Germany. He believes that the Italian opera represented by Rossini is superficial, while the German opera represented by Beethoven is profound. Over time, this contrasting relationship gave rise to stereotypes and gradually evolved into a broader contrast between the cultures and arts of Italy and Germany. This article aims to address this issue by examining Rossini's representative opera "L'italiana in Algeri," focusing on the aria "Languir per una bella," and analyzing the recitative "Gott! Welch Dunkel hier!" and "In des Lebens Frühlingstagen" from Beethoven's opera "Fidelio." The analysis will explore three aspects of vocal performance, examining the differences in opera composition between Rossini and Beethoven from the perspective of the singer. Furthermore, it will discuss the contrasting perceptions of Rossini and Beethoven as reflected in the "twin styles" stereotype. Employing dialectical thinking, the article will compare the works of Rossini and Beethoven and offer unique insights form a vocalist.
19 世纪的双重风格:对罗西尼和贝多芬的刻板印象
19 世纪,达尔豪斯的 "孪生风格 "将罗西尼和贝多芬作为意大利和德国的代表进行比较。他认为,以罗西尼为代表的意大利歌剧是肤浅的,而以贝多芬为代表的德国歌剧则是深刻的。随着时间的推移,这种对比关系产生了刻板印象,并逐渐演变成意大利和德国文化与艺术之间更广泛的对比。本文旨在通过研究罗西尼的代表歌剧《L'italiana in Algeri》来解决这一问题,重点关注咏叹调 "Languir per una bella",并分析朗诵部分 "Gott!Welch Dunkel hier!" 和贝多芬歌剧 "Fidelio "中的 "In des Lebens Frühlingstagen"。分析将探讨声乐表演的三个方面,从歌唱家的角度研究罗西尼和贝多芬在歌剧创作方面的差异。此外,文章还将讨论 "孪生风格 "刻板印象中对罗西尼和贝多芬的截然不同的看法。文章将运用辩证思维,对罗西尼和贝多芬的作品进行比较,并提出声乐家的独特见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信