Evaluation of Marginal Adaptation of Three Biomaterials as Apical Barrier in Experimental Apexification Model

N. Aktaş, Didem Sakaryalı Uyar, Didem Atabek
{"title":"Evaluation of Marginal Adaptation of Three Biomaterials as Apical Barrier in Experimental Apexification Model","authors":"N. Aktaş, Didem Sakaryalı Uyar, Didem Atabek","doi":"10.54617/adoklinikbilimler.1451031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The purpose of this study was to compare the marginal adaptation of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA), Biodentine, and EndoSequence as apical plug materials after orthograde placement in an experimental apexification model using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). \nMaterial and Methods: The study was conducted with sixty single-rooted mature mandibular premolar teeth. These teeth were prepared as 12 mm root lengths, and apical regions of teeth were enlarged by using peeso reamers to give the open apex form likely with the immature teeth as an experimental apexification model. ProRoot MTA, Biodentine, and EndoSequence used as apical plug materials were placed into the apical region of samples with a thickness of 4 mm. After filling the remaining root canal with gutta-percha, each sample was divided into three transverse sections by using a hard tissue microtome to evaluate marginal adaptation between dentine walls and apical plug material using a confocal laser scanning microscopy. Then, gap areas of all microscope images were measured with Image J program. \nResults: MTA showed the highest marginal adaptation, followed by EndoSequence and Biodentine. Biodentine was significantly inferior to the other materials in marginal adaptation (p0.01). \nConclusion: MTA and EndoSequence exhibited superior marginal adaptation as apical plugs compared to Biodentine. Biodentine had the poorest adaptation among the three materials.","PeriodicalId":500863,"journal":{"name":"Ado klinik bilimler dergisi","volume":"10 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ado klinik bilimler dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54617/adoklinikbilimler.1451031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of this study was to compare the marginal adaptation of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA), Biodentine, and EndoSequence as apical plug materials after orthograde placement in an experimental apexification model using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Material and Methods: The study was conducted with sixty single-rooted mature mandibular premolar teeth. These teeth were prepared as 12 mm root lengths, and apical regions of teeth were enlarged by using peeso reamers to give the open apex form likely with the immature teeth as an experimental apexification model. ProRoot MTA, Biodentine, and EndoSequence used as apical plug materials were placed into the apical region of samples with a thickness of 4 mm. After filling the remaining root canal with gutta-percha, each sample was divided into three transverse sections by using a hard tissue microtome to evaluate marginal adaptation between dentine walls and apical plug material using a confocal laser scanning microscopy. Then, gap areas of all microscope images were measured with Image J program. Results: MTA showed the highest marginal adaptation, followed by EndoSequence and Biodentine. Biodentine was significantly inferior to the other materials in marginal adaptation (p0.01). Conclusion: MTA and EndoSequence exhibited superior marginal adaptation as apical plugs compared to Biodentine. Biodentine had the poorest adaptation among the three materials.
评估三种生物材料作为根尖屏障在实验性根尖化模型中的边缘适应性
目的:本研究的目的是使用共焦激光扫描显微镜(CLSM),比较三氧化二铝矿物质(MTA)、Biodentine 和 EndoSequence 作为根尖充填材料在实验性根尖化模型中正位后的边缘适应性。材料和方法:研究对象为 60 颗单根成熟下颌前磨牙。这些牙齿的牙根长度为 12 毫米,使用peeso铰刀扩大牙齿的根尖区域,使其具有未成熟牙齿可能具有的开放式牙尖形态,作为实验性牙尖强化模型。将用作根尖塞材料的 ProRoot MTA、Biodentine 和 EndoSequence 放入样本的根尖区域,厚度为 4 毫米。在用古塔漆填充剩余根管后,用硬组织显微切片机将每个样本分成三个横向切片,使用共焦激光扫描显微镜评估牙本质壁与根尖塞材料之间的边缘适应性。然后,用 Image J 程序测量所有显微镜图像的间隙面积。结果显示MTA 的边缘适应性最高,其次是 EndoSequence 和 Biodentine。Biodentine 在边缘适应性方面明显不如其他材料(P0.01)。结论:与 Biodentine 相比,MTA 和 EndoSequence 作为根尖塞显示出更好的边缘适应性。在三种材料中,Biodentine的适应性最差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信