A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ANESTHETIC BLOCK TECHNIQUES (V-BLOCK VS. H-BLOCK) FOR REMOVAL OF INGROWN TOENAIL

A. Farooqi, F. Zaheer, S. Salman, .. Sadia, S. Shaikh, S. Rimsha
{"title":"A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ANESTHETIC BLOCK TECHNIQUES (V-BLOCK VS. H-BLOCK) FOR REMOVAL OF INGROWN TOENAIL","authors":"A. Farooqi, F. Zaheer, S. Salman, .. Sadia, S. Shaikh, S. Rimsha","doi":"10.54112/bcsrj.v2024i1.959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ingrown toenail (onychocryptosis) is a common and painful condition often requiring surgical intervention. Adequate local anaesthesia is crucial for patient comfort and surgical success. However, the optimal anaesthetic technique for this procedure remains debated. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the anaesthetic efficacy, patient comfort, onset and duration of anaesthesia, and occurrence of complications between the V-block and H-block techniques during surgical procedures for ingrown toenail removal. Methods: After ethical approval, an open-label randomised control trial was conducted at Ruth PFAU Civil Hospital, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi. One hundred eighty-eight patients, aged 18 and above, with type II, III, and IV onychocryptosis were included. Patients were randomly assigned to either Group A (H-technique, n=94) or Group B (V-technique, n=94). Local anaesthesia was administered using 5 ml of 2% Xylocaine diluted in 5 ml of distilled water. Pain severity, numbness, and loss of sensation were assessed at 2, 5, and 10 minutes post-injection. Data were analysed using SPSS version 26. Results: Group A (H-technique) had a significantly younger average age (35.12±9.8 years) compared to Group B (39.77±13.01 years). Gender distribution differed significantly, but weight did not. At 2 minutes, Group B reported more pain (90% vs. 86.5%, P=0.045). At 5 and 10 minutes, Group B showed higher numbness and loss of sensation, indicating more comprehensive anaesthesia. Efficacy at 10 minutes was higher in Group B (44% vs. 39%, P=0.045), with similar trends at 20 minutes but no significant difference. Conclusion: The V-block technique offers rapid onset and effective pain relief for routine procedures, while the H-block technique provides more comprehensive and sustained anaesthesia for complex surgeries. The selection of anaesthetic techniques should be based on the surgical context to optimise patient outcomes. Further research is recommended to enhance these techniques' efficacy and minimise complications.","PeriodicalId":504575,"journal":{"name":"Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v2024i1.959","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ingrown toenail (onychocryptosis) is a common and painful condition often requiring surgical intervention. Adequate local anaesthesia is crucial for patient comfort and surgical success. However, the optimal anaesthetic technique for this procedure remains debated. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the anaesthetic efficacy, patient comfort, onset and duration of anaesthesia, and occurrence of complications between the V-block and H-block techniques during surgical procedures for ingrown toenail removal. Methods: After ethical approval, an open-label randomised control trial was conducted at Ruth PFAU Civil Hospital, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi. One hundred eighty-eight patients, aged 18 and above, with type II, III, and IV onychocryptosis were included. Patients were randomly assigned to either Group A (H-technique, n=94) or Group B (V-technique, n=94). Local anaesthesia was administered using 5 ml of 2% Xylocaine diluted in 5 ml of distilled water. Pain severity, numbness, and loss of sensation were assessed at 2, 5, and 10 minutes post-injection. Data were analysed using SPSS version 26. Results: Group A (H-technique) had a significantly younger average age (35.12±9.8 years) compared to Group B (39.77±13.01 years). Gender distribution differed significantly, but weight did not. At 2 minutes, Group B reported more pain (90% vs. 86.5%, P=0.045). At 5 and 10 minutes, Group B showed higher numbness and loss of sensation, indicating more comprehensive anaesthesia. Efficacy at 10 minutes was higher in Group B (44% vs. 39%, P=0.045), with similar trends at 20 minutes but no significant difference. Conclusion: The V-block technique offers rapid onset and effective pain relief for routine procedures, while the H-block technique provides more comprehensive and sustained anaesthesia for complex surgeries. The selection of anaesthetic techniques should be based on the surgical context to optimise patient outcomes. Further research is recommended to enhance these techniques' efficacy and minimise complications.
切除嵌生趾甲的麻醉阻滞技术(V-阻滞与 H-阻滞)比较研究
趾甲内生(onychocryptosis)是一种常见的疼痛症状,通常需要手术治疗。充分的局部麻醉对患者的舒适度和手术的成功至关重要。然而,该手术的最佳麻醉技术仍存在争议。研究目的本研究旨在评估和比较 V 型阻滞和 H 型阻滞技术在内生趾甲切除手术中的麻醉效果、患者舒适度、麻醉开始时间和持续时间以及并发症发生率。研究方法经伦理批准后,在卡拉奇陶尔健康科学大学鲁斯 PFAU 民用医院进行了一项开放标签随机对照试验。188名年龄在18岁及以上的II型、III型和IV型甲沟炎患者被纳入其中。患者被随机分配到 A 组(H 技术,94 人)或 B 组(V 技术,94 人)。使用 5 毫升 2% 的氟氯卡因稀释在 5 毫升蒸馏水中进行局部麻醉。在注射后 2 分钟、5 分钟和 10 分钟对疼痛严重程度、麻木和感觉丧失进行评估。数据使用 SPSS 26 版进行分析。结果甲组(H 技术)的平均年龄(35.12±9.8 岁)明显小于乙组(39.77±13.01 岁)。性别分布有明显差异,但体重没有差异。2 分钟时,B 组报告的疼痛程度更高(90% 对 86.5%,P=0.045)。5 分钟和 10 分钟时,B 组麻木感和感觉丧失程度更高,表明麻醉更全面。10 分钟时,B 组的疗效更高(44% 对 39%,P=0.045),20 分钟时的趋势相似,但无显著差异。结论V 型阻滞技术可为常规手术提供快速起效和有效的镇痛效果,而 H 型阻滞技术可为复杂手术提供更全面和持续的麻醉效果。麻醉技术的选择应以手术环境为基础,以优化患者的治疗效果。建议进一步开展研究,以提高这些技术的功效并将并发症降至最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信