Discretion in Making Administrative Decisions on the Establishment and Clarification of Mandatory Requirements

D. A. Polezhaev
{"title":"Discretion in Making Administrative Decisions on the Establishment and Clarification of Mandatory Requirements","authors":"D. A. Polezhaev","doi":"10.17803/2311-5998.2024.117.5.222-229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the discretion in making administrative decisions on the issues of establishing and clarifying mandatory requirements of regulatory legal acts. The author analyzes the normative legal regulation, in the Russian Federation», and considers specific examples of legally established powers of administrative authorities. In the course of the study the author comes to the conclusion that the root cause of discretion in making managerial decisions is the law, its imperfection or on the contrary a conscious measure of the legislator, giving discretionary powers to officials. The author proposes possible solutions to the cases of imperfections of legislative acts identified by him, in particular, by amending such legislative acts. In conclusion, the author notes that imperfection (lack of systematic regulation, gaps, etc.) of legislative acts, vesting administrative bodies with relevant powers, affects the degree of discretion in establishing and explaining mandatory requirements by administrative bodies. In some cases, such a degree of discretion is excessive, leading to unfavorable practical consequences, which, in turn, calls into question the achievement of generally recognized (public) goals of the institution of mandatory requirements.","PeriodicalId":508920,"journal":{"name":"Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL))","volume":" 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL))","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2024.117.5.222-229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is devoted to the discretion in making administrative decisions on the issues of establishing and clarifying mandatory requirements of regulatory legal acts. The author analyzes the normative legal regulation, in the Russian Federation», and considers specific examples of legally established powers of administrative authorities. In the course of the study the author comes to the conclusion that the root cause of discretion in making managerial decisions is the law, its imperfection or on the contrary a conscious measure of the legislator, giving discretionary powers to officials. The author proposes possible solutions to the cases of imperfections of legislative acts identified by him, in particular, by amending such legislative acts. In conclusion, the author notes that imperfection (lack of systematic regulation, gaps, etc.) of legislative acts, vesting administrative bodies with relevant powers, affects the degree of discretion in establishing and explaining mandatory requirements by administrative bodies. In some cases, such a degree of discretion is excessive, leading to unfavorable practical consequences, which, in turn, calls into question the achievement of generally recognized (public) goals of the institution of mandatory requirements.
制定和澄清强制性要求的行政决定自由裁量权
文章专门论述了在制定和明确规范性法案的强制性要求问题上做出行政决定的自由裁量权。作者分析了 "俄罗斯联邦 "的规范性法律条例,并举例说明了法律规定的行政机关权力。在研究过程中,作者得出结论,管理决策自由裁量权的根本原因是法律、法律的不完善,或者相反,是立法者有意识地赋予官员自由裁量权。作者针对他所发现的法律不完善的情况提出了可行的解决方案,特别是通过修订这些法律。总之,作者指出,赋予行政机构相关权力的法案的不完善(缺乏系统性规定、空白等)影响了行政机构在制定和解释强制性要求时的自由裁量权程度。在某些情况下,这种自由裁量权过大,导致了不利的实际后果,反过来又使人们对强制性要求制度公认(公共)目标的实现产生怀疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信