Nursing students' experiences of transitioning from clinical practice to untact practice education

{"title":"Nursing students' experiences of transitioning from clinical practice to untact practice education","authors":"","doi":"10.22251/jlcci.2024.24.13.433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives The purposes of this study were to nursing students' experiences of transitioning from clinical practice to untact practice education. \nMethods A phenomenological study was conducted with 13 university students in City C who experienced contactless practicum during the pandemic. Data collected through semi-structured individual in-depth interviews after completing clinical pediatric practicum developed by a professor of pediatric nursing were analyzed using Colaizzi's procedure. \nResults 3 categories were identified: questioning whether clinical pediatric practice should be replaced, perception of the effectiveness of online practice, and perception of the complexity of pediatric nursing, and 10 subthemes were identified: clinical practice limitations and regrets, nuring career concerns, limitations of online practice, reducing stress and tension levels, self-directed learning experiences, reducing negative feelings about clinical practice, team collaboration experiences, perceived difficulties, ignorance, and uncertainty in practicing pediatric nursing. \nConclusions It is necessary to discuss the deficiencies of post-corona pediatric practice sites, and to development and systematize various untact practice education contents and established various educational environments.","PeriodicalId":509731,"journal":{"name":"Korean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum And Instruction","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum And Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2024.24.13.433","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives The purposes of this study were to nursing students' experiences of transitioning from clinical practice to untact practice education. Methods A phenomenological study was conducted with 13 university students in City C who experienced contactless practicum during the pandemic. Data collected through semi-structured individual in-depth interviews after completing clinical pediatric practicum developed by a professor of pediatric nursing were analyzed using Colaizzi's procedure. Results 3 categories were identified: questioning whether clinical pediatric practice should be replaced, perception of the effectiveness of online practice, and perception of the complexity of pediatric nursing, and 10 subthemes were identified: clinical practice limitations and regrets, nuring career concerns, limitations of online practice, reducing stress and tension levels, self-directed learning experiences, reducing negative feelings about clinical practice, team collaboration experiences, perceived difficulties, ignorance, and uncertainty in practicing pediatric nursing. Conclusions It is necessary to discuss the deficiencies of post-corona pediatric practice sites, and to development and systematize various untact practice education contents and established various educational environments.
护理专业学生从临床实践过渡到非临床实践教育的经历
目的 本研究旨在了解护理专业学生从临床实习过渡到非接触式实习教育的经历。方法 对 C 市 13 名在大流行期间经历过非接触式实习的大学生进行了现象学研究。在完成儿科护理学教授制定的儿科临床实践后,通过半结构化个人深度访谈收集的数据采用科莱兹程序进行了分析。结果 确定了 3 个类别:质疑是否应取代儿科临床实践、感知在线实践的有效性、感知儿科护理的复杂性,并确定了 10 个次主题:临床实践的局限性和遗憾、护理职业的担忧、在线实践的局限性、减轻压力和紧张程度、自主学习体验、减轻对临床实践的负面情绪、团队合作体验、感知儿科护理实践中的困难、无知和不确定性。结论 有必要对科罗娜后儿科实践基地的不足进行讨论,并开发和系统化各种非接触式实践教育内容,建立各种教育环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信