Model Relationship Between Performance Criteria And The Most Significant Accounting Of Value-Based Criteria : Economic Added Value (EVA)

Rafika Sari, Vhika Meiriasari
{"title":"Model Relationship Between Performance Criteria And The Most Significant Accounting Of Value-Based Criteria : Economic Added Value (EVA)","authors":"Rafika Sari, Vhika Meiriasari","doi":"10.38035/dijefa.v5i3.3044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Monetary patrons make informed decisions by assessing positive pointers that an association could show from this point forward, rather than relying altogether upon its evident execution. Consequently, this assessment plans to explore the relationship between execution norms and the main worth based estimation: Monetary Added Worth (EVA). Besides, it investigates what future EVA values mean for a bank's overall worth. The audit uses Board Data Examination and OLS Backslide models to assess the backslide condition. The audit separated data from ten banks in the BIST Banks Rundown spreading over the period from 2011 to 2020. In this manner, the Monetary Added Worth (EVA) measures were changed into standardized EVA (SEVA) by parceling EVA by full scale assets. The eventual outcomes of the Standard Least Squares (OLS) backslide assessment showed that the model's illustrative power for the SEVA variable was 71.92%. Extraordinarily, three variables showed positive associations with SEVA: benefit per share (EPS) and TOBINQ at a significance level of 1%, as well as the improvement speed of cost to-bargains at a significance level of 10%. Concerning Board Data Assessment, the SEVA variable showed an illustrative power of 72.14%, with a basic relationship saw among SEVA and the EPS and TOBINQ measures at the 1% significance level. Observational revelations recommend that including future SEVA as a mediator for bank regard holds responsibility, and it is recognized that the SEVA variable can go about as an intermediary measure for bank regard. Concerning Board Data Examination, the SEVA variable displayed a sensible power of 72.14%. Very, its relationship with the pay per share (EPS) and TOBINQ models was seen as immense at the 1% significance level. Careful assessments suggest that the model, which involves future SEVA as a middle person for bank regard, holds ensure. It is recognized that the SEVA variable can go about as a substitute measure for bank regard. \n ","PeriodicalId":127910,"journal":{"name":"Dinasti International Journal of Economics, Finance & Accounting","volume":" 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dinasti International Journal of Economics, Finance & Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38035/dijefa.v5i3.3044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Monetary patrons make informed decisions by assessing positive pointers that an association could show from this point forward, rather than relying altogether upon its evident execution. Consequently, this assessment plans to explore the relationship between execution norms and the main worth based estimation: Monetary Added Worth (EVA). Besides, it investigates what future EVA values mean for a bank's overall worth. The audit uses Board Data Examination and OLS Backslide models to assess the backslide condition. The audit separated data from ten banks in the BIST Banks Rundown spreading over the period from 2011 to 2020. In this manner, the Monetary Added Worth (EVA) measures were changed into standardized EVA (SEVA) by parceling EVA by full scale assets. The eventual outcomes of the Standard Least Squares (OLS) backslide assessment showed that the model's illustrative power for the SEVA variable was 71.92%. Extraordinarily, three variables showed positive associations with SEVA: benefit per share (EPS) and TOBINQ at a significance level of 1%, as well as the improvement speed of cost to-bargains at a significance level of 10%. Concerning Board Data Assessment, the SEVA variable showed an illustrative power of 72.14%, with a basic relationship saw among SEVA and the EPS and TOBINQ measures at the 1% significance level. Observational revelations recommend that including future SEVA as a mediator for bank regard holds responsibility, and it is recognized that the SEVA variable can go about as an intermediary measure for bank regard. Concerning Board Data Examination, the SEVA variable displayed a sensible power of 72.14%. Very, its relationship with the pay per share (EPS) and TOBINQ models was seen as immense at the 1% significance level. Careful assessments suggest that the model, which involves future SEVA as a middle person for bank regard, holds ensure. It is recognized that the SEVA variable can go about as a substitute measure for bank regard.  
绩效标准与基于价值标准的最重要会计之间的模型关系 :经济增加值(EVA)
金融客户在做出明智的决策时,会评估一个协会从这一点出发可能表现出的积极指针,而不是完全依赖其明显的执行力。因此,本次评估计划探讨执行规范与主要价值评估之间的关系:货币附加值(EVA)之间的关系。此外,它还调查了未来的 EVA 值对银行整体价值的意义。审计采用董事会数据检查和 OLS 背滑模型来评估背滑状况。该审计将 BIST 银行名录中的十家银行的数据分开,时间跨度为 2011 年至 2020 年。在此基础上,将货币增加值(EVA)指标按全规模资产划分为标准化 EVA(SEVA)。标准最小二乘法(OLS)反演评估的最终结果显示,模型对 SEVA 变量的说明力为 71.92%。此外,有三个变量与 SEVA 呈正相关:每股收益(EPS)、TOBINQ(显著性水平为 1%)以及成本-议价改进速度(显著性水平为 10%)。关于董事会数据评估,SEVA 变量的说明力为 72.14%,在 1%的显著性水平下,SEVA 与 EPS 和 TOBINQ 之间存在基本关系。观察结果表明,将 SEVA 作为银行关注度的中介变量是有责任的,SEVA 变量可以作为银行关注度的中介变量。关于董事会数据检查,SEVA 变量显示出 72.14%的合理性。在 1%的显著性水平下,它与每股收益(EPS)和 TOBINQ 模型的关系非常密切。仔细评估表明,将未来 SEVA 作为银行关注的中间人的模型是有保证的。人们认识到,SEVA 变量可以作为银行关注的替代措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信