Evaluating 3-D positioning infrastructure quality and utilization: The potential improvement with multi-GNSS methods

Q3 Engineering
Dedi Atunggal, N. Widjajanti, Trias Aditya
{"title":"Evaluating 3-D positioning infrastructure quality and utilization: The potential improvement with multi-GNSS methods","authors":"Dedi Atunggal, N. Widjajanti, Trias Aditya","doi":"10.21924/cst.9.1.2024.1403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article evaluates the quality of the national 3-D positioning infrastructure using multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) to simulate the potential application of multi-GNSS method. The MCDM evaluation used coverage and availability of Indonesia Continuous Operating Reference System (INACORS) services, distribution of survey pillars, and accuracy of height determination using the Indonesian Geoid Model (INAGEOID). The term multi-GNSS method refers to the utilization of PPP method as a complement to the conventional differential GNSS method for the production of mapping control points. The results of this evaluation were complemented by a questionnaire analysis on the utilization of positioning infrastructure by respondents from various professional backgrounds. The MCDM evaluation results showed that Java had nearly 100% good or excellent 3-D positioning infrastructure quality. Other regions in Indonesia still had significant areas of average, fair, or even poor quality. The questionnaire results showed that many users have faced some problems in areas with fair or poor infrastructure quality. The application of multi-GNSS method can contribute to reduce up to half of the area with fair and poor positioning infrastructure quality.","PeriodicalId":36437,"journal":{"name":"Communications in Science and Technology","volume":" 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications in Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21924/cst.9.1.2024.1403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article evaluates the quality of the national 3-D positioning infrastructure using multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) to simulate the potential application of multi-GNSS method. The MCDM evaluation used coverage and availability of Indonesia Continuous Operating Reference System (INACORS) services, distribution of survey pillars, and accuracy of height determination using the Indonesian Geoid Model (INAGEOID). The term multi-GNSS method refers to the utilization of PPP method as a complement to the conventional differential GNSS method for the production of mapping control points. The results of this evaluation were complemented by a questionnaire analysis on the utilization of positioning infrastructure by respondents from various professional backgrounds. The MCDM evaluation results showed that Java had nearly 100% good or excellent 3-D positioning infrastructure quality. Other regions in Indonesia still had significant areas of average, fair, or even poor quality. The questionnaire results showed that many users have faced some problems in areas with fair or poor infrastructure quality. The application of multi-GNSS method can contribute to reduce up to half of the area with fair and poor positioning infrastructure quality.
评估三维定位基础设施的质量和利用率:多重全球导航卫星系统方法的潜在改进
本文利用多标准决策(MCDM)评估了国家三维定位基础设施的质量,以模拟多重全球导航卫星系统方法的潜在应用。MCDM 评估使用了印度尼西亚连续运行参考系统(INACORS)服务的覆盖范围和可用性、测量柱的分布以及使用印度尼西亚大地水准面模型(INAGEOID)确定高度的准确性。所谓多重全球导航卫星系统方法,是指利用 PPP 方法作为传统差分全球导航卫星系统方法的补充,以生成测绘控制点。除了这一评价结果之外,还对来自不同专业背景的受访者利用定位基础设施的情况进行了问卷分析。MCDM 评估结果表明,爪哇的三维定位基础设施质量几乎 100%良好或优秀。印尼其他地区仍有相当大的区域质量一般、一般甚至较差。问卷调查结果显示,许多用户在基础设施质量一般或较差的地区遇到了一些问题。多重全球导航卫星系统方法的应用有助于减少多达一半的定位基础设施质量一般和较差的地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Communications in Science and Technology
Communications in Science and Technology Engineering-Engineering (all)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信