Review on the Implementation of the Consumer Act of the Philippines: Insights to Its Plausible Future

{"title":"Review on the Implementation of the Consumer Act of the Philippines: Insights to Its Plausible Future","authors":"","doi":"10.34104/ijma.024.071084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a developing Southeast Asian nation, the Philippines have experienced economic growth, leading to challenges in ensuring consumer protection. This study reviewed the level of implementation of Consumer Act of the Philippines (Act) and explored insights to its plausible future. This used both quantitative and qualitative components. This was conducted in Capiz. For the survey, respondents comprised of consumers buying in Roxas City supermarkets and grocery stores selling basic commodities. For Focus Group Discussion (FGD), business owner representative, Department of Trade and Industry implementers, and consumer organization members participated. For the challenges encountered in Act’s implementation, respondents believed that the law protects their rights, but they lacked awareness of how to enforce it with perceived weaknesses on Act’s effectiveness in enforcing penalties. For the level of implementation, respondents believed that the Act effectively ensured the quality and safety of consumer products in the market, reduced deceptive, unfair, and conscionable sales acts or practices, provided efficient resolution for valid warranty claims, protected against misleading or deceptive packaging techniques, holds businesses accountable for product and service imperfection, prevents misleading advertisements and fraudulent sales promotion practices, regulates service and repair enterprises, and ensures effective consumer complaints handling. Consumers perceived that Act's provision on penalties was inadequate, ineffective in addressing broader issues, inadequately implements provision on warranties, labeling, and fair packaging, no provision on claims for damages, with gaps in addressing issues on sales promotion, service, and consumer complaints handling. Participants highlighted the need to promote consumer education, clearer guidelines on acceptable sales practices, and areas for improvement in online marketplaces, consumer awareness, and enhanced enforcement capabilities. Overall, strengthened consumer advocacy, enforcement training, and education, provision of harsher penalties, collaboration with other stakeholders, enhanced screening measures on online shopping platforms, and streamlined online dispute resolutions.","PeriodicalId":514298,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Management and Accounting","volume":" 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Management and Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34104/ijma.024.071084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As a developing Southeast Asian nation, the Philippines have experienced economic growth, leading to challenges in ensuring consumer protection. This study reviewed the level of implementation of Consumer Act of the Philippines (Act) and explored insights to its plausible future. This used both quantitative and qualitative components. This was conducted in Capiz. For the survey, respondents comprised of consumers buying in Roxas City supermarkets and grocery stores selling basic commodities. For Focus Group Discussion (FGD), business owner representative, Department of Trade and Industry implementers, and consumer organization members participated. For the challenges encountered in Act’s implementation, respondents believed that the law protects their rights, but they lacked awareness of how to enforce it with perceived weaknesses on Act’s effectiveness in enforcing penalties. For the level of implementation, respondents believed that the Act effectively ensured the quality and safety of consumer products in the market, reduced deceptive, unfair, and conscionable sales acts or practices, provided efficient resolution for valid warranty claims, protected against misleading or deceptive packaging techniques, holds businesses accountable for product and service imperfection, prevents misleading advertisements and fraudulent sales promotion practices, regulates service and repair enterprises, and ensures effective consumer complaints handling. Consumers perceived that Act's provision on penalties was inadequate, ineffective in addressing broader issues, inadequately implements provision on warranties, labeling, and fair packaging, no provision on claims for damages, with gaps in addressing issues on sales promotion, service, and consumer complaints handling. Participants highlighted the need to promote consumer education, clearer guidelines on acceptable sales practices, and areas for improvement in online marketplaces, consumer awareness, and enhanced enforcement capabilities. Overall, strengthened consumer advocacy, enforcement training, and education, provision of harsher penalties, collaboration with other stakeholders, enhanced screening measures on online shopping platforms, and streamlined online dispute resolutions.
菲律宾消费者法》实施情况回顾:对《消费者法》似是而非的未来的见解
作为一个东南亚发展中国家,菲律宾经历了经济增长,从而在确保消费者保护方面面临挑战。本研究回顾了《菲律宾消费者法案》(以下简称《法案》)的实施情况,并对其未来的发展前景进行了深入探讨。研究采用了定量和定性两种方法。研究在卡皮兹省进行。调查对象包括在罗萨斯市超市和杂货店购买基本商品的消费者。参加焦点小组讨论(FGD)的有企业主代表、贸易和工业部执行人员以及消费者组织成员。关于该法实施过程中遇到的挑战,受访者认为该法保护了他们的权利,但他们缺乏如何执 行该法的意识,认为该法在执行处罚方面存在不足。在执行力度方面,受访者认为《消法》有效地保障了市场上消费品的质量和安全,减少 了欺骗性、不公平和昧良心的销售行为或做法,为有效的保修索赔提供了有效的解决方案, 防止了误导性或欺骗性的包装技术,追究了企业对产品和服务不完善的责任,防止了误导性 广告和欺诈性促销行为,规范了服务和维修企业,确保了消费者投诉的有效处理。消费者认为,该法关于处罚的规定不够充分,不能有效解决更广泛的问题,没有充分执行关于保证、标签和公平包装的规定,没有关于损害赔偿的规定,在解决促销、服务和消费者投诉处理问题方面存在差距。与会者强调,有必要促进消费者教育,就可接受的销售行为制定更明确的准则,并在网上市场、消费者意识和加强执法能力方面加以改进。总之,要加强消费者宣传、执法培训和教育,提供更严厉的处罚,与其他利益相关方合作,加强网上购物平台的筛查措施,简化网上争议解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信