Victorious Voices: Legal and Social Triumphs against Sexual Harassment in Higher Education—A Case Study

Sexes Pub Date : 2024-07-17 DOI:10.3390/sexes5030017
A. Vidu, Teresa Sordé-Martí, Patricia Melgar, M. Joanpere
{"title":"Victorious Voices: Legal and Social Triumphs against Sexual Harassment in Higher Education—A Case Study","authors":"A. Vidu, Teresa Sordé-Martí, Patricia Melgar, M. Joanpere","doi":"10.3390/sexes5030017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sexual harassment in academia has gained attention due to legislative measures, university mechanisms, and student solidarity networks. This article explores the factors contributing to survivors winning when suing their university. The case described here relates to a North American university in a state with regulations against harassment and an active student movement. It delves into a case at the University of California, Irvine, where four individuals sued for the mishandling of sexual harassment complaints, resulting in the dismissal of a prominent professor. Drawing on data from the EU UniswithHeart research project, the article analyzes the impact of solidarity networks and the trial outcome. Through desk research and qualitative interviews, it identifies key elements leading to legal victories against universities, even in the case of a professor who made a big donation to the university, who was banned from campus, and who had his name removed from buildings. This study shows ten aspects that lead to winning a harassment case within universities, emphasizing the importance of addressing the consequences of harassment. It also illustrates the improvement of the academic environment and science when eliminating the hostile climate and silence. Successful outcomes inspire other survivors and urge universities to uphold policies for a safer academic environment.","PeriodicalId":21562,"journal":{"name":"Sexes","volume":" 16","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/sexes5030017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sexual harassment in academia has gained attention due to legislative measures, university mechanisms, and student solidarity networks. This article explores the factors contributing to survivors winning when suing their university. The case described here relates to a North American university in a state with regulations against harassment and an active student movement. It delves into a case at the University of California, Irvine, where four individuals sued for the mishandling of sexual harassment complaints, resulting in the dismissal of a prominent professor. Drawing on data from the EU UniswithHeart research project, the article analyzes the impact of solidarity networks and the trial outcome. Through desk research and qualitative interviews, it identifies key elements leading to legal victories against universities, even in the case of a professor who made a big donation to the university, who was banned from campus, and who had his name removed from buildings. This study shows ten aspects that lead to winning a harassment case within universities, emphasizing the importance of addressing the consequences of harassment. It also illustrates the improvement of the academic environment and science when eliminating the hostile climate and silence. Successful outcomes inspire other survivors and urge universities to uphold policies for a safer academic environment.
胜利的声音:反对高等教育中性骚扰的法律和社会胜利--案例研究
学术界的性骚扰问题因立法措施、大学机制和学生团结网络而备受关注。本文探讨了导致幸存者在起诉大学时胜诉的因素。本文描述的案例涉及北美某州的一所大学,该州制定了禁止骚扰的法规,学生运动也很活跃。它深入研究了加州大学欧文分校的一个案例,在这个案例中,有四人起诉学校对性骚扰投诉处理不当,导致一名著名教授被解雇。文章利用欧盟 UniswithHeart 研究项目的数据,分析了团结网络的影响和审判结果。通过案头研究和定性访谈,文章指出了导致大学在法律上获胜的关键因素,即使是在一位教授向大学捐赠巨款、被禁止进入校园并被从建筑物上除名的情况下。本研究从十个方面展示了导致大学内部骚扰案件胜诉的原因,强调了解决骚扰后果的重要性。它还说明了在消除敌意气氛和沉默后,学术环境和科学水平的提高。成功的结果激励着其他幸存者,并敦促大学坚持政策,以营造更安全的学术环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信