Indocyanine green fluorescence‐guided sentinel lymph node biopsy: A systematic review

Sanjena Venkatesh, Emma De Ravin, K. Rajasekaran
{"title":"Indocyanine green fluorescence‐guided sentinel lymph node biopsy: A systematic review","authors":"Sanjena Venkatesh, Emma De Ravin, K. Rajasekaran","doi":"10.1002/wjo2.197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accurate staging of cervical lymph nodes is crucial in the management of head and neck cancers (HNCs). Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) offers a minimally invasive alternative to neck dissection for identifying occult metastases. This review aims to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence‐guided SLNB for HNCs.Systematic searches of the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases were conducted to identify all clinical articles on ICG‐guided SLNB in HNC from database inception through May 1, 2022. Numerous variables were extracted across papers, including patient and study characteristics, imaging parameters, and SLN detection rates. Risk of bias was evaluated via the Methodological Index for Non‐Randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria.A final six studies met inclusion criteria, encompassing 86 distinct head and neck tumors. The mean number of SLNs identified was 2.46 for fluorescence imaging and 2.83 for gamma tracing. Fluorescence imaging exhibited a higher pooled SLN detection rate (98.0%) compared to gamma tracing (87.6%). Pooled sensitivity for fluorescence imaging (71.0%) was also determined to be higher than that for gamma tracing (66.7%). Pooled specificity was 100% across both modalities. Studies were assessed to be of moderate quality by the MINORS criteria, with an average score of 11.25 for noncomparative studies and 20.5 for comparative studies.ICG‐guided SLNB procedures are feasible and effective in the context of HNCs. The technique offers potentially higher SLN detection rates and shows promise in enhancing clinical and oncologic outcomes when compared to standard lymphoscintigraphy. Further studies with standardized metrics are, however, needed to validate these findings and identify optimal imaging techniques and parameters.","PeriodicalId":510563,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjo2.197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate staging of cervical lymph nodes is crucial in the management of head and neck cancers (HNCs). Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) offers a minimally invasive alternative to neck dissection for identifying occult metastases. This review aims to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence‐guided SLNB for HNCs.Systematic searches of the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases were conducted to identify all clinical articles on ICG‐guided SLNB in HNC from database inception through May 1, 2022. Numerous variables were extracted across papers, including patient and study characteristics, imaging parameters, and SLN detection rates. Risk of bias was evaluated via the Methodological Index for Non‐Randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria.A final six studies met inclusion criteria, encompassing 86 distinct head and neck tumors. The mean number of SLNs identified was 2.46 for fluorescence imaging and 2.83 for gamma tracing. Fluorescence imaging exhibited a higher pooled SLN detection rate (98.0%) compared to gamma tracing (87.6%). Pooled sensitivity for fluorescence imaging (71.0%) was also determined to be higher than that for gamma tracing (66.7%). Pooled specificity was 100% across both modalities. Studies were assessed to be of moderate quality by the MINORS criteria, with an average score of 11.25 for noncomparative studies and 20.5 for comparative studies.ICG‐guided SLNB procedures are feasible and effective in the context of HNCs. The technique offers potentially higher SLN detection rates and shows promise in enhancing clinical and oncologic outcomes when compared to standard lymphoscintigraphy. Further studies with standardized metrics are, however, needed to validate these findings and identify optimal imaging techniques and parameters.
吲哚菁绿荧光引导的前哨淋巴结活检:系统综述
宫颈淋巴结的准确分期对头颈部癌症(HNC)的治疗至关重要。前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)是颈部切除术的一种微创替代方法,可用于确定隐匿性转移灶。本综述旨在评估吲哚菁绿(ICG)荧光引导下SLNB治疗HNC的可行性和有效性。我们对PubMed、Embase和Scopus数据库进行了系统检索,以确定自数据库建立至2022年5月1日期间所有关于ICG引导下SLNB治疗HNC的临床文章。研究人员提取了大量论文变量,包括患者和研究特征、成像参数和SLN检出率。通过非随机研究方法指数(MINORS)标准对偏倚风险进行了评估。最后有六项研究符合纳入标准,包括86种不同的头颈部肿瘤。荧光成像的SLN平均识别数量为2.46个,伽马追踪的平均识别数量为2.83个。荧光成像的SLN集合检测率(98.0%)高于伽马追踪(87.6%)。荧光成像的集合灵敏度(71.0%)也高于伽马追踪(66.7%)。两种模式的汇总特异性均为 100%。根据 MINORS 标准,这些研究被评为中等质量,非对比研究的平均得分为 11.25 分,对比研究的平均得分为 20.5 分。与标准淋巴管造影相比,该技术可能提供更高的 SLN 检测率,并有望提高临床和肿瘤治疗效果。不过,要验证这些发现并确定最佳成像技术和参数,还需要进一步开展标准化指标研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信