{"title":"PENERAPAN ASAS ULTRA PETITUM PARTIUM DI PENGADILAN AGAMA PERSPEKTIF HUKUM ISLAM","authors":"Larasati Fitriani Asis","doi":"10.54298/tarunalaw.v2i02.209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract\nThis research examines the application of the ultra petita partium principle in the Religious Courts from the perspective of Islamic law, namely a principle that prohibits judges from deciding cases beyond what is demanded by the parties to the case. This principle is one of the important principles held in religious justice. This research is based on legal research with the category of library research. The approach used in this research is a normative juridical approach. The results of the research show that basically the principles of justice, equality and non-burdensomeness in Islamic law are closely related to the application of the principle of ultra petitum partium. By ensuring that every individual is treated equally and that no decision exceeds the demands submitted, the Religious Courts can maintain fairness and integrity in every decision they make. However, there are exceptions where judges are deemed not to have violated the principle of ultra petitum partium when proceeding in the Religious Courts, especially in divorce cases regarding determining the maintenance of the wife and children who must be borne by the husband during the divorce lawsuit as stated in the provisional decision. Even without a provisional decision from the wife, the judge can issue a provisional decision.\nKeywords: Ultra Petitum Partium, Islamic Law, Religious Courts\nAbstrak\nPenelitian ini mengkaji tentang penerapan asas ultra petita partium di Pengadilan Agama dalam perspektif hukum Islam, yakni sebuah asas yang melarang hakim memutus perkara melebihi apa yang dituntut oleh para pihak yang berperkara. Asas tersebut merupakan salah satu asas penting yang dipegang dalam peradilan agama. Penelitian ini berdasarkan pada penelitian hukum dengan kategori jenis penelitian kepustakaan (library research). Pendekatan yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini, yaitu pendekatan yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pada dasarnya prinsip keadilan, kesetaraan, dan tidak memberatkan dalam hukum Islam sangat berkaitan dengan penerapan asas ultra petitum partium. Dengan memastikan bahwa setiap individu diperlakukan sama dan tidak ada keputusan yang melebihi tuntutan yang diajukan, Pengadilan Agama dapat menjaga keadilan dan integritas dalam setiap putusan yang diambil. Namun, terdapat pengecualian hakim dipandang tidak melanggar asas ultra petitum partium saat beracara di Pengadilan Agama khususnya dalam perkara perceraian atas penentuan nafkah istri dan anak yang harus ditanggung oleh suami selama berlangsungnya gugatan perceraian yang dituangkan dalam putusan provisi. Sekalipun tanpa ada putusan provisi dari istri, hakim dapat menjatuhkan putusan provisi.\nKata Kunci: Ultra Petitum Partium, Hukum Islam, Pengadilan Agama","PeriodicalId":518247,"journal":{"name":"TARUNALAW : Journal of Law and Syariah","volume":" 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TARUNALAW : Journal of Law and Syariah","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54298/tarunalaw.v2i02.209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract
This research examines the application of the ultra petita partium principle in the Religious Courts from the perspective of Islamic law, namely a principle that prohibits judges from deciding cases beyond what is demanded by the parties to the case. This principle is one of the important principles held in religious justice. This research is based on legal research with the category of library research. The approach used in this research is a normative juridical approach. The results of the research show that basically the principles of justice, equality and non-burdensomeness in Islamic law are closely related to the application of the principle of ultra petitum partium. By ensuring that every individual is treated equally and that no decision exceeds the demands submitted, the Religious Courts can maintain fairness and integrity in every decision they make. However, there are exceptions where judges are deemed not to have violated the principle of ultra petitum partium when proceeding in the Religious Courts, especially in divorce cases regarding determining the maintenance of the wife and children who must be borne by the husband during the divorce lawsuit as stated in the provisional decision. Even without a provisional decision from the wife, the judge can issue a provisional decision.
Keywords: Ultra Petitum Partium, Islamic Law, Religious Courts
Abstrak
Penelitian ini mengkaji tentang penerapan asas ultra petita partium di Pengadilan Agama dalam perspektif hukum Islam, yakni sebuah asas yang melarang hakim memutus perkara melebihi apa yang dituntut oleh para pihak yang berperkara. Asas tersebut merupakan salah satu asas penting yang dipegang dalam peradilan agama. Penelitian ini berdasarkan pada penelitian hukum dengan kategori jenis penelitian kepustakaan (library research). Pendekatan yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini, yaitu pendekatan yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pada dasarnya prinsip keadilan, kesetaraan, dan tidak memberatkan dalam hukum Islam sangat berkaitan dengan penerapan asas ultra petitum partium. Dengan memastikan bahwa setiap individu diperlakukan sama dan tidak ada keputusan yang melebihi tuntutan yang diajukan, Pengadilan Agama dapat menjaga keadilan dan integritas dalam setiap putusan yang diambil. Namun, terdapat pengecualian hakim dipandang tidak melanggar asas ultra petitum partium saat beracara di Pengadilan Agama khususnya dalam perkara perceraian atas penentuan nafkah istri dan anak yang harus ditanggung oleh suami selama berlangsungnya gugatan perceraian yang dituangkan dalam putusan provisi. Sekalipun tanpa ada putusan provisi dari istri, hakim dapat menjatuhkan putusan provisi.
Kata Kunci: Ultra Petitum Partium, Hukum Islam, Pengadilan Agama
摘要 本研究从伊斯兰法的角度探讨了宗教法院适用 "超当事人原则 "的情况,即禁止法官对案件做出超出当事人要求的裁决的原则。该原则是宗教司法的重要原则之一。本研究以法律研究为基础,属于图书馆研究范畴。本研究采用的方法是规范法学方法。研究结果表明,伊斯兰教法中的公正、平等和非苛刻原则基本上与 "超小部分 "原则的应用密切相关。通过确保平等对待每一个人,确保任何裁决都不超出所提交的要求,宗教法庭可以在其做出的每一个裁决中保持公平和公正。不过,也有一些例外情况,法官在宗教法院审理案件时被认为没有违反 "极端小题大做 "的原 则,特别是在离婚案件中,如临时判决所述,在离婚诉讼期间,妻子和子女的抚养费必须由丈夫 承担。即使没有妻子的临时判决,法官也可以做出临时判决:Ultra Petitum Partium, Islamic Law, Religious Courts Abstract This research examines the application of the ultra petita partium principle in the Religious Courts in the perspective of Islamic Law.该原则是宗教法院的重要原则之一。本研究以法律研究为基础,属于图书馆研究范畴。本研究采用的方法是规范法学方法。研究结果表明,伊斯兰法中的公正、平等和不加重负担原则基本上都与 "超小部分 "原则的应用密切相关。通过确保对每个人一视同仁,确保任何判决都不超出所提出的要求,宗教法庭可以在做出的每项裁决中保持公平和公正。不过,也有例外情况,法官在宗教法院进行诉讼时被视为不违反 "极端小题大做 "原则,特别是在离婚案件中,如临时判决所述,在离婚诉讼期间必须由丈夫承担妻子和子女的抚养费。即使没有妻子的临时判决,法官也可以做出临时判决:Ultra Petitum Partium、伊斯兰法、宗教法庭