Assessing Column Stability: A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Regression Models for Shear Strength Prediction

Aybike Özyüksel Çiftçioğlu
{"title":"Assessing Column Stability: A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Regression Models for Shear Strength Prediction","authors":"Aybike Özyüksel Çiftçioğlu","doi":"10.56554/jtom.1401261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research presents a comprehensive investigation into the accurate estimation of shear strength in rectangular reinforced concrete columns through advanced machine learning (ML) models. The study addresses the intricate challenge posed by shear strength complexity, which is crucial for evaluating column stability and ensuring structural integrity. Building upon a substantial dataset comprising 545 experimental observations sourced from diverse literature, this research establishes a robust foundation for predictive modeling. Four distinct ML regression models, Random Forest, Decision Tree, XGBoost, and LightGBM, are meticulously evaluated for their performance. The evaluation employs established metrics, including R2, RMSE, MAE, and MAPE to quantify their predictive capabilities. The outcomes highlight the models' robustness in capturing nuanced variations in shear strength, with impressive R2 values ranging from 93.6% to 93.9%, showcasing their exceptional ability to elucidate intricate shear behaviors. Furthermore, comparative analysis indicates the slightly superior performance of the Random Forest over the Decision Tree, highlighting the efficacy of ensemble methods in this context. Extending the exploration to include XGBoost and LightGBM, the study showcases their potential as accurate shear strength predictors. The performance of the models is validated through scatter plots and error distribution plots, confirming accurate shear strength predictions across various scenarios. This research contributes significantly to the advancement of structural engineering methodologies by highlighting the potential of ML to improve the accuracy of shear strength estimation. The findings not only underscore the exceptional performance of ML models but also provide valuable insights into their comparative effectiveness, paving the way for enhanced structural assessments in columns.","PeriodicalId":265520,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Turkish Operations Management","volume":" 24","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Turkish Operations Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56554/jtom.1401261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research presents a comprehensive investigation into the accurate estimation of shear strength in rectangular reinforced concrete columns through advanced machine learning (ML) models. The study addresses the intricate challenge posed by shear strength complexity, which is crucial for evaluating column stability and ensuring structural integrity. Building upon a substantial dataset comprising 545 experimental observations sourced from diverse literature, this research establishes a robust foundation for predictive modeling. Four distinct ML regression models, Random Forest, Decision Tree, XGBoost, and LightGBM, are meticulously evaluated for their performance. The evaluation employs established metrics, including R2, RMSE, MAE, and MAPE to quantify their predictive capabilities. The outcomes highlight the models' robustness in capturing nuanced variations in shear strength, with impressive R2 values ranging from 93.6% to 93.9%, showcasing their exceptional ability to elucidate intricate shear behaviors. Furthermore, comparative analysis indicates the slightly superior performance of the Random Forest over the Decision Tree, highlighting the efficacy of ensemble methods in this context. Extending the exploration to include XGBoost and LightGBM, the study showcases their potential as accurate shear strength predictors. The performance of the models is validated through scatter plots and error distribution plots, confirming accurate shear strength predictions across various scenarios. This research contributes significantly to the advancement of structural engineering methodologies by highlighting the potential of ML to improve the accuracy of shear strength estimation. The findings not only underscore the exceptional performance of ML models but also provide valuable insights into their comparative effectiveness, paving the way for enhanced structural assessments in columns.
评估柱稳定性:剪切强度预测的机器学习回归模型比较研究
本研究通过先进的机器学习(ML)模型,对准确估算矩形钢筋混凝土柱的抗剪强度进行了全面调查。该研究解决了剪切强度复杂性带来的复杂挑战,这对于评估柱稳定性和确保结构完整性至关重要。本研究以大量数据集为基础,其中包括从各种文献中获取的 545 个实验观测数据,为预测建模奠定了坚实的基础。对随机森林、决策树、XGBoost 和 LightGBM 四种不同的 ML 回归模型进行了细致的性能评估。评估采用了既定指标,包括 R2、RMSE、MAE 和 MAPE,以量化它们的预测能力。结果凸显了这些模型在捕捉剪切强度细微变化方面的稳健性,R2 值从 93.6% 到 93.9% 不等,令人印象深刻,展示了它们阐明复杂剪切行为的卓越能力。此外,比较分析表明,随机森林的性能略优于决策树,突出了集合方法在此方面的功效。研究将探索范围扩大到 XGBoost 和 LightGBM,展示了它们作为精确剪切强度预测器的潜力。通过散点图和误差分布图验证了模型的性能,确认了在各种情况下剪切强度预测的准确性。这项研究通过强调 ML 在提高剪切强度估算准确性方面的潜力,为结构工程方法的进步做出了重大贡献。研究结果不仅强调了 ML 模型的卓越性能,还为它们的比较效果提供了宝贵的见解,为加强柱结构评估铺平了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信