The accuracy of intraoperative O-arm imaging in assessing thoracolumbar pedicle screws placement

IF 0.6
Felipe A. Chavez, Carlos A. Arellanes Chavez, Maria E. Martinez Tapia, Carolina Martinez-Loya, Cesar M. Gaytan Medina
{"title":"The accuracy of intraoperative O-arm imaging in assessing thoracolumbar pedicle screws placement","authors":"Felipe A. Chavez, Carlos A. Arellanes Chavez, Maria E. Martinez Tapia, Carolina Martinez-Loya, Cesar M. Gaytan Medina","doi":"10.25259/jmsr_132_2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nPedicle screw fixation in spine surgery is often considered the gold standard due to its biomechanical advantages. Complications such as screw misplacement may arise during the procedure, leading to severe consequences. Intraoperative 2D/3D imaging system images or a post-operative computed tomography (CT) scan are employed to assess this. This study aimed to determine the agreement between these two imaging systems to evaluate the placement of transpedicular screws using the Zdichavsky classification.\n\n\n\nImage data from the intraoperative 2D/3D imaging system and CT scans of patients undergoing spine surgery at the neurosurgery department were collected from March 2021 to May 2022. The position of transpedicular screws was evaluated using the Zdichavsky classification.\n\n\n\nImages from 19 patients, 7 males (36.84%) and 12 females (63.16%), aged 28–77 years, were gathered. A total of 131 transpedicular screws were evaluated, ranging from 4 to 10 screws per patient. In the post-operative CT scan, 123 screws were classified as type Ia (93.89%), seven screws as type Ib (5.34%), and one screw as type IIb (0.76%). With the navigation system, 125 screws were classified as type Ia (95.42%), five as type Ib (3.82%), and one screw as type IIb (0.76%).\n\n\n\nIt was demonstrated that intraoperative 2D/3D system images can be used to assess screw placement without the need for post-operative studies such as CT scans.\n","PeriodicalId":266222,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Musculoskeletal Surgery and Research","volume":" 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Musculoskeletal Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/jmsr_132_2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pedicle screw fixation in spine surgery is often considered the gold standard due to its biomechanical advantages. Complications such as screw misplacement may arise during the procedure, leading to severe consequences. Intraoperative 2D/3D imaging system images or a post-operative computed tomography (CT) scan are employed to assess this. This study aimed to determine the agreement between these two imaging systems to evaluate the placement of transpedicular screws using the Zdichavsky classification. Image data from the intraoperative 2D/3D imaging system and CT scans of patients undergoing spine surgery at the neurosurgery department were collected from March 2021 to May 2022. The position of transpedicular screws was evaluated using the Zdichavsky classification. Images from 19 patients, 7 males (36.84%) and 12 females (63.16%), aged 28–77 years, were gathered. A total of 131 transpedicular screws were evaluated, ranging from 4 to 10 screws per patient. In the post-operative CT scan, 123 screws were classified as type Ia (93.89%), seven screws as type Ib (5.34%), and one screw as type IIb (0.76%). With the navigation system, 125 screws were classified as type Ia (95.42%), five as type Ib (3.82%), and one screw as type IIb (0.76%). It was demonstrated that intraoperative 2D/3D system images can be used to assess screw placement without the need for post-operative studies such as CT scans.
术中 O 型臂成像评估胸腰椎椎弓根螺钉置放的准确性
脊柱手术中的椎弓根螺钉固定因其生物力学优势而常被视为黄金标准。手术过程中可能会出现螺钉错位等并发症,导致严重后果。术中二维/三维成像系统图像或术后计算机断层扫描(CT)可用于评估这种情况。本研究旨在确定这两种成像系统在使用 Zdichavsky 分类法评估经关节螺钉位置时的一致性。研究人员于 2021 年 3 月至 2022 年 5 月期间收集了神经外科接受脊柱手术患者的术中 2D/3D 成像系统和 CT 扫描图像数据。收集了19名患者的图像,其中男性7名(36.84%),女性12名(63.16%),年龄在28-77岁之间。共评估了 131 枚经关节螺钉,每位患者的螺钉数量从 4 枚到 10 枚不等。在术后 CT 扫描中,123 枚螺钉被归类为 Ia 型(93.89%),7 枚螺钉被归类为 Ib 型(5.34%),1 枚螺钉被归类为 IIb 型(0.76%)。使用导航系统后,125 颗螺钉被归类为 Ia 型(95.42%),5 颗螺钉被归类为 Ib 型(3.82%),1 颗螺钉被归类为 IIb 型(0.76%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书