How do students deal with the uncertainty of sustainability challenges? Metacognitive learning in a transdisciplinary course

N. Bohm, Renate G. Klaassen, Ellen van Bueren, Perry den Brok
{"title":"How do students deal with the uncertainty of sustainability challenges? Metacognitive learning in a transdisciplinary course","authors":"N. Bohm, Renate G. Klaassen, Ellen van Bueren, Perry den Brok","doi":"10.3389/feduc.2024.1362075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While tackling sustainability challenges, engineering students confront various uncertainties, including the unpredictability of real-world scenarios, unfamiliar aspects of problems, and conflicting viewpoints among stakeholders. Despite previous research indicating the likelihood of encountering such uncertainties in sustainability projects, it is unclear if students are aware of uncertainty and what specific regulatory behaviors they develop to address them. This study seeks to deepen our understanding of the awareness and regulation of uncertainty by students while they work on real-life sustainability challenges. To achieve this, we observed nine MSc students enrolled in a transdisciplinary course on urban sustainability at a Dutch university of technology. Through interviews, we explored the uncertainties they faced and how they navigated them. Our analysis, conducted through open, consensus-based coding by two researchers, revealed that students primarily encountered the uncertainty of multiplicity, characterized by divergent stakeholder perspectives. Additionally, students increasingly recognized the inherent unpredictability of the challenges over the course. To address uncertainty, students developed three kinds of behaviors to deal with uncertainty: seeking social support from commissioners, coaches, and peers; employing small coping mechanisms to overcome obstacles; and developing attitudes such as empathy, flexibility, and relativism. This study offers detailed insights into how students navigate uncertainty. Moving forward, efforts in uncertainty education should prioritize how educators can positively influence the development of metacognition in uncertainty.","PeriodicalId":508739,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Education","volume":" 87","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1362075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While tackling sustainability challenges, engineering students confront various uncertainties, including the unpredictability of real-world scenarios, unfamiliar aspects of problems, and conflicting viewpoints among stakeholders. Despite previous research indicating the likelihood of encountering such uncertainties in sustainability projects, it is unclear if students are aware of uncertainty and what specific regulatory behaviors they develop to address them. This study seeks to deepen our understanding of the awareness and regulation of uncertainty by students while they work on real-life sustainability challenges. To achieve this, we observed nine MSc students enrolled in a transdisciplinary course on urban sustainability at a Dutch university of technology. Through interviews, we explored the uncertainties they faced and how they navigated them. Our analysis, conducted through open, consensus-based coding by two researchers, revealed that students primarily encountered the uncertainty of multiplicity, characterized by divergent stakeholder perspectives. Additionally, students increasingly recognized the inherent unpredictability of the challenges over the course. To address uncertainty, students developed three kinds of behaviors to deal with uncertainty: seeking social support from commissioners, coaches, and peers; employing small coping mechanisms to overcome obstacles; and developing attitudes such as empathy, flexibility, and relativism. This study offers detailed insights into how students navigate uncertainty. Moving forward, efforts in uncertainty education should prioritize how educators can positively influence the development of metacognition in uncertainty.
学生如何应对可持续性挑战的不确定性?跨学科课程中的元认知学习
在应对可持续发展挑战时,工科学生会面临各种不确定性,包括现实世界场景的不可预测性、问题的陌生方面以及利益相关者之间的观点冲突。尽管之前的研究表明,在可持续发展项目中很可能会遇到这些不确定性,但学生们是否意识到了不确定性,以及他们会采取哪些具体的规范行为来应对这些不确定性,目前尚不清楚。本研究旨在加深我们对学生在应对现实生活中的可持续发展挑战时对不确定性的认识和调节的理解。为此,我们观察了在荷兰一所科技大学学习城市可持续发展跨学科课程的九名硕士生。通过访谈,我们探讨了他们所面临的不确定性以及他们是如何驾驭这些不确定性的。我们的分析是由两名研究人员通过开放式、基于共识的编码进行的,分析结果显示,学生们主要遇到了多重性的不确定性,其特点是利益相关者的观点各不相同。此外,学生们在学习过程中越来越认识到挑战固有的不可预测性。为了应对不确定性,学生们发展了三种行为来应对不确定性:从专员、教练和同伴那里寻求社会支持;采用小的应对机制来克服障碍;以及发展同理心、灵活性和相对主义等态度。这项研究提供了关于学生如何驾驭不确定性的详细见解。展望未来,不确定性教育工作应优先考虑教育者如何积极影响不确定性中元认知的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信