A one health approach to tackling AMR and why gender matters: findings from pastoralist communities in Tanzania

V. Barasa
{"title":"A one health approach to tackling AMR and why gender matters: findings from pastoralist communities in Tanzania","authors":"V. Barasa","doi":"10.3389/fgwh.2024.1429203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Inappropriate use of antimicrobials is a major driver of AMR in low-resource settings, where the regulation of supply for pharmaceuticals is limited. In pastoralist settings in Tanzania, men and women face varying degrees of exposure to antibiotics due to gender relations that shape access and use of antimicrobials. For example, critical limitations in healthcare systems in these settings, including inadequate coverage of health services put people at risk of AMR, as families routinely administer self-treatment at home with antimicrobials. However, approaches to understanding AMR drivers and risk distribution, including the One Health approach, have paid little attention to these gender considerations. Understanding differences in access and use of antimicrobials can inform interventions to reduce AMR risk in community settings. This paper focuses on the gendered risk of AMR through a study of gender and social determinants of access to and use of antimicrobials in low-resource pastoralist settings in Tanzania.A mixed methods approach involving household surveys, interviews and ethnographic participant observation in homes and sites of healthcare provision was used, to investigate access and administration of antibiotics in 379 adults in Naiti, Monduli district in northern Tanzania. A purposive sampling technique was used to recruit study participants and all data was disaggregated by sex, age and gender.Gender and age are significantly associated with the use of antibiotics without a prescription in the study population. Young people aged 18-24 are more likely to use unprescribed antibiotics than older people and may be at a higher risk of AMR. Meanwhile, although more men purchase unprescribed antibiotics than women, the administration of these drugs is more common among women. This is because men control how women use drugs at the household level.AMR interventions must consider the critical importance of adopting and implementing a gender-sensitive One Health approach, as gender interacts with other social determinants of health to shape AMR risk through access to and use of antimicrobials, particularly in resource-limited pastoralist settings.","PeriodicalId":504610,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Global Women's Health","volume":" 31","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Global Women's Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2024.1429203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Inappropriate use of antimicrobials is a major driver of AMR in low-resource settings, where the regulation of supply for pharmaceuticals is limited. In pastoralist settings in Tanzania, men and women face varying degrees of exposure to antibiotics due to gender relations that shape access and use of antimicrobials. For example, critical limitations in healthcare systems in these settings, including inadequate coverage of health services put people at risk of AMR, as families routinely administer self-treatment at home with antimicrobials. However, approaches to understanding AMR drivers and risk distribution, including the One Health approach, have paid little attention to these gender considerations. Understanding differences in access and use of antimicrobials can inform interventions to reduce AMR risk in community settings. This paper focuses on the gendered risk of AMR through a study of gender and social determinants of access to and use of antimicrobials in low-resource pastoralist settings in Tanzania.A mixed methods approach involving household surveys, interviews and ethnographic participant observation in homes and sites of healthcare provision was used, to investigate access and administration of antibiotics in 379 adults in Naiti, Monduli district in northern Tanzania. A purposive sampling technique was used to recruit study participants and all data was disaggregated by sex, age and gender.Gender and age are significantly associated with the use of antibiotics without a prescription in the study population. Young people aged 18-24 are more likely to use unprescribed antibiotics than older people and may be at a higher risk of AMR. Meanwhile, although more men purchase unprescribed antibiotics than women, the administration of these drugs is more common among women. This is because men control how women use drugs at the household level.AMR interventions must consider the critical importance of adopting and implementing a gender-sensitive One Health approach, as gender interacts with other social determinants of health to shape AMR risk through access to and use of antimicrobials, particularly in resource-limited pastoralist settings.
以 "一体健康 "方法应对 AMR 以及性别问题的原因:坦桑尼亚牧民社区的调查结果
抗菌药物的不当使用是导致低资源环境中急性呼吸道感染(AMR)的主要原因,因为在这些环境中,药品供应的监管十分有限。在坦桑尼亚的牧区,由于性别关系影响了抗菌药物的获取和使用,男性和女性面临着不同程度的抗生素风险。例如,在这些环境中,医疗保健系统存在严重的局限性,包括医疗服务覆盖面不足,这使人们面临AMR的风险,因为家庭通常会在家中使用抗菌药物进行自我治疗。然而,了解 AMR 驱动因素和风险分布的方法(包括 "一体健康 "方法)却很少关注这些性别因素。了解获取和使用抗菌药物方面的差异,可以为在社区环境中降低 AMR 风险的干预措施提供依据。本文通过对坦桑尼亚资源匮乏的牧区获取和使用抗菌药物的性别和社会决定因素的研究,重点探讨了AMR的性别风险。本文采用了一种混合方法,包括家庭调查、访谈以及对家庭和医疗保健提供场所的人种学参与观察,对坦桑尼亚北部蒙多利区奈提的379名成年人获取和使用抗生素的情况进行了调查。研究采用目的性抽样技术招募参与者,所有数据均按性别、年龄和性取向分列。与老年人相比,18-24 岁的年轻人更有可能使用无处方抗生素,而且可能面临更高的急性呼吸道感染风险。与此同时,虽然购买无处方抗生素的男性多于女性,但使用这些药物的女性更为常见。AMR干预措施必须考虑到采用和实施对性别问题有敏感认识的 "一体健康 "方法的极端重要性,因为性别与健康的其他社会决定因素相互作用,通过获取和使用抗菌药物来影响AMR风险,尤其是在资源有限的牧区环境中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信