A review and benchmark of feature importance methods for neural networks

IF 23.8 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS
Hannes Mandler, Bernhard Weigand
{"title":"A review and benchmark of feature importance methods for neural networks","authors":"Hannes Mandler, Bernhard Weigand","doi":"10.1145/3679012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Feature attribution methods (AMs) are a simple means to provide explanations for the predictions of black-box models like neural networks. Due to their conceptual differences, the numerous different methods, however, yield ambiguous explanations. While this allows for obtaining different insights into the model, it also complicates the decision which method to adopt. This paper, therefore, summarizes the current state of the art regarding AMs, which includes the requirements and desiderata of the methods themselves as well as the properties of their explanations. Based on a survey of existing methods, a representative subset consisting of the\n δ\n -sensitivity index, permutation feature importance, variance-based feature importance in artificial neural networks and DeepSHAP, is described in greater detail and, for the first time, benchmarked in a regression context. Specifically for this purpose, a new verification strategy for model-specific AMs is proposed. As expected, the explanations’ agreement with the intuition and among each other clearly depends on the AMs’ properties. This has two implications: First, careful reasoning about the selection of an AM is required. Secondly, it is recommended to apply multiple AMs and combine their insights in order to reduce the model’s opacity even further.\n","PeriodicalId":50926,"journal":{"name":"ACM Computing Surveys","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":23.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Computing Surveys","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3679012","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Feature attribution methods (AMs) are a simple means to provide explanations for the predictions of black-box models like neural networks. Due to their conceptual differences, the numerous different methods, however, yield ambiguous explanations. While this allows for obtaining different insights into the model, it also complicates the decision which method to adopt. This paper, therefore, summarizes the current state of the art regarding AMs, which includes the requirements and desiderata of the methods themselves as well as the properties of their explanations. Based on a survey of existing methods, a representative subset consisting of the δ -sensitivity index, permutation feature importance, variance-based feature importance in artificial neural networks and DeepSHAP, is described in greater detail and, for the first time, benchmarked in a regression context. Specifically for this purpose, a new verification strategy for model-specific AMs is proposed. As expected, the explanations’ agreement with the intuition and among each other clearly depends on the AMs’ properties. This has two implications: First, careful reasoning about the selection of an AM is required. Secondly, it is recommended to apply multiple AMs and combine their insights in order to reduce the model’s opacity even further.
神经网络特征重要性方法回顾与基准
特征归因法(AMs)是为神经网络等黑箱模型的预测提供解释的一种简单方法。然而,由于概念上的差异,众多不同的方法会产生模棱两可的解释。虽然这样可以获得对模型的不同见解,但也使决定采用哪种方法变得复杂。因此,本文总结了有关 AM 的当前技术水平,其中包括方法本身的要求和需要,以及其解释的特性。在对现有方法进行调查的基础上,本文更详细地介绍了由δ灵敏度指数、排列特征重要性、人工神经网络中基于方差的特征重要性和 DeepSHAP 组成的代表性子集,并首次在回归背景下对其进行了基准测试。为此,特别提出了针对特定模型 AM 的新验证策略。不出所料,解释与直觉以及解释之间的一致性显然取决于 AMs 的属性。这有两层含义:首先,在选择 AM 时需要仔细推敲。其次,建议采用多种 AM 并结合其见解,以进一步降低模型的不透明性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACM Computing Surveys
ACM Computing Surveys 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
33.20
自引率
0.60%
发文量
372
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: ACM Computing Surveys is an academic journal that focuses on publishing surveys and tutorials on various areas of computing research and practice. The journal aims to provide comprehensive and easily understandable articles that guide readers through the literature and help them understand topics outside their specialties. In terms of impact, CSUR has a high reputation with a 2022 Impact Factor of 16.6. It is ranked 3rd out of 111 journals in the field of Computer Science Theory & Methods. ACM Computing Surveys is indexed and abstracted in various services, including AI2 Semantic Scholar, Baidu, Clarivate/ISI: JCR, CNKI, DeepDyve, DTU, EBSCO: EDS/HOST, and IET Inspec, among others.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信