Non-Pharmacological Interventions for the Treatment of Raynaud’s phenomenon—A Systematic Review

Farhan Mahmood, Helena Chase, Sandrine Soucy, Stephanie Perron, Mohamad Ahmad, Peter Tugwell, N. Maltez
{"title":"Non-Pharmacological Interventions for the Treatment of Raynaud’s phenomenon—A Systematic Review","authors":"Farhan Mahmood, Helena Chase, Sandrine Soucy, Stephanie Perron, Mohamad Ahmad, Peter Tugwell, N. Maltez","doi":"10.18192/uojm.v13i1.6175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The objective of this systematic review is to describe existing literature pertaining to the use of non-pharmacological interventions (NPIs) for the management of primary or secondary Raynaud’s Phenomenon (RP) compared to placebo. \nMethods: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, and EMBASE were searched from their inception to the present for randomized controlled trials and clinical trials for studies assessing the therapeutic effects NPIs in primary or secondary RP. The studies were screened, and data were extracted by two reviewers. The major outcomes assessed included frequency (per week) and duration (minutes) of attacks and pain. \nResults: We found 23 parallel or crossover RCTs, 5 of which were not discussed in this review. The categories of NPIs included acupuncture and other needling techniques (n=4), temperature biofeedback (n=4), lasers and electrotherapy (n=5), exercise therapy (n=2), gas therapy (n=1), therapeutic gloves (n=1), and ischemic preconditioning (n=1). Most studies demonstrated trends towards therapeutic benefit; however, there was substantial heterogeneity amongst the studies. Laser therapy had the most consistent evidence; 60% and 75% of the studies reported significant improvements in frequency of attacks per week and pain. Acupuncture therapies had minimal statistically significant benefits and the data for temperature biofeedback were inconsistent and of low quality. Exercise therapy is more recently being explored showing a marked therapeutic benefit for pain. \nConclusion: The evidence is limited and inconsistent; however, the studies demonstrated a trend towards therapeutic benefits, with laser and electrotherapy having the most consistent evidence. Further high-quality and multi-center RCTs are required.","PeriodicalId":30662,"journal":{"name":"University of Ottawa Journal of Medicine","volume":" February","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Ottawa Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18192/uojm.v13i1.6175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this systematic review is to describe existing literature pertaining to the use of non-pharmacological interventions (NPIs) for the management of primary or secondary Raynaud’s Phenomenon (RP) compared to placebo. Methods: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, and EMBASE were searched from their inception to the present for randomized controlled trials and clinical trials for studies assessing the therapeutic effects NPIs in primary or secondary RP. The studies were screened, and data were extracted by two reviewers. The major outcomes assessed included frequency (per week) and duration (minutes) of attacks and pain. Results: We found 23 parallel or crossover RCTs, 5 of which were not discussed in this review. The categories of NPIs included acupuncture and other needling techniques (n=4), temperature biofeedback (n=4), lasers and electrotherapy (n=5), exercise therapy (n=2), gas therapy (n=1), therapeutic gloves (n=1), and ischemic preconditioning (n=1). Most studies demonstrated trends towards therapeutic benefit; however, there was substantial heterogeneity amongst the studies. Laser therapy had the most consistent evidence; 60% and 75% of the studies reported significant improvements in frequency of attacks per week and pain. Acupuncture therapies had minimal statistically significant benefits and the data for temperature biofeedback were inconsistent and of low quality. Exercise therapy is more recently being explored showing a marked therapeutic benefit for pain. Conclusion: The evidence is limited and inconsistent; however, the studies demonstrated a trend towards therapeutic benefits, with laser and electrotherapy having the most consistent evidence. Further high-quality and multi-center RCTs are required.
治疗雷诺现象的非药物干预--系统综述
目的:本系统性综述旨在描述现有文献中有关使用非药物干预措施(NPIs)治疗原发性或继发性雷诺现象(RP)的情况,并与安慰剂进行比较。研究方法在 Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials、MEDLINE 和 EMBASE 中检索了从开始至今的随机对照试验和临床试验,以评估 NPIs 对原发性或继发性雷诺现象的治疗效果。研究经过筛选,数据由两名审稿人提取。评估的主要结果包括发作频率(每周)和持续时间(分钟)以及疼痛。结果:我们发现了 23 项平行或交叉研究,其中 5 项未在本综述中讨论。NPIs 类别包括针灸和其他针刺技术(4 项)、体温生物反馈(4 项)、激光和电疗(5 项)、运动疗法(2 项)、气体疗法(1 项)、治疗手套(1 项)和缺血预处理(1 项)。大多数研究显示了治疗获益的趋势;但是,这些研究之间存在很大的异质性。激光疗法的证据最为一致;60% 和 75% 的研究报告称,该疗法对每周发作频率和疼痛有显著改善。针灸疗法在统计学上的显著疗效微乎其微,温度生物反馈疗法的数据不一致且质量不高。最近对运动疗法的研究显示,运动疗法对疼痛有明显的治疗效果。结论证据有限且不一致;不过,研究显示了治疗效果的趋势,其中激光和电疗法的证据最为一致。需要进一步开展高质量的多中心 RCT 研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书