Bacterial Load on the Surface of Amniocentesis Operators with or without Long-Sleeved Surgical Gowns: A Prospective Cohort Study

Jinyu Wang, Ying Song, Lingling Sun, Xijing Liu, Fan Zhou, Qianying Zhao, Jing Wang, Xuemei Zhang, Mei Yang, Dan Xie, Ting Hu, Shanling Liu
{"title":"Bacterial Load on the Surface of Amniocentesis Operators with or without Long-Sleeved Surgical Gowns: A Prospective Cohort Study","authors":"Jinyu Wang, Ying Song, Lingling Sun, Xijing Liu, Fan Zhou, Qianying Zhao, Jing Wang, Xuemei Zhang, Mei Yang, Dan Xie, Ting Hu, Shanling Liu","doi":"10.31083/j.ceog5107162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background : There is currently no specific requirement for operator’s attires performing amniocentesis, especially for repetitive am-niocenteses. We investigated the contamination status on the surface of operators with or without long-sleeved surgical gowns during repetitive amniocenteses to examine whether they are different. Methods : In a prospective cohort study, consecutive samples were collected from the surface of amniocentesis operators with short-sleeved scrubs (bare arms) or with long-sleeved surgical gowns on 4 sites (including the left and right proximal medial forearm, and the left and right ventral wrist). There were 7 time spots during each sampling period. Results : The highest colony count among all plates was 65 colony forming units (cfu)/plate. We observed 85.3% (382/448) and 65.1% (255/392) plates with 0 colony count from operators with bare arms and in surgical gowns, respectively. Moreover, the bacterial load of the group with surgical gowns had an increasing trend with time while the other group showed a contrary trend. Conclusions : All colony counts observed were within the hygiene specification of the National Health Commission of China. Instead of attires, other measures with high-quality evidence including surveillance of hand hygiene and control of indoor air bacterial load should be given more attention.","PeriodicalId":505527,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/j.ceog5107162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background : There is currently no specific requirement for operator’s attires performing amniocentesis, especially for repetitive am-niocenteses. We investigated the contamination status on the surface of operators with or without long-sleeved surgical gowns during repetitive amniocenteses to examine whether they are different. Methods : In a prospective cohort study, consecutive samples were collected from the surface of amniocentesis operators with short-sleeved scrubs (bare arms) or with long-sleeved surgical gowns on 4 sites (including the left and right proximal medial forearm, and the left and right ventral wrist). There were 7 time spots during each sampling period. Results : The highest colony count among all plates was 65 colony forming units (cfu)/plate. We observed 85.3% (382/448) and 65.1% (255/392) plates with 0 colony count from operators with bare arms and in surgical gowns, respectively. Moreover, the bacterial load of the group with surgical gowns had an increasing trend with time while the other group showed a contrary trend. Conclusions : All colony counts observed were within the hygiene specification of the National Health Commission of China. Instead of attires, other measures with high-quality evidence including surveillance of hand hygiene and control of indoor air bacterial load should be given more attention.
穿或不穿长袖手术服的羊膜腔穿刺术操作者体表的细菌负荷:前瞻性队列研究
背景:目前对羊膜腔穿刺术操作者的着装没有具体要求,尤其是重复羊膜腔穿刺术。我们调查了重复羊膜腔穿刺时穿长袖手术衣和不穿长袖手术衣的操作者表面的污染状况,以研究两者是否存在差异。方法:在一项前瞻性队列研究中,我们从穿短袖手术服(裸露手臂)或穿长袖手术服的羊膜腔穿刺操作者的 4 个部位(包括左、右前臂内侧近端,左、右手腕腹侧)连续采集样本。每个采样期有 7 个时间点。结果:所有平板中最高的菌落数为 65 菌落数/平板。我们观察到,85.3%(382/448)和 65.1%(255/392)的平板菌落数为 0,分别来自赤膊和穿手术服的操作者。此外,穿手术衣组的细菌量随时间呈上升趋势,而穿手术衣组的细菌量则呈相反趋势。结论 :所有观察到的菌落总数均符合中国国家卫生委员会的卫生规范。除着装外,其他具有高质量证据的措施,包括手部卫生监测和室内空气细菌量控制,也应得到更多关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信