Prevalence of use of nonpharmacological methods of pain relief among patients following onco surgeries – A prospective, observational cohort study from a single center

Sumitra G Bakshi, K. Arya, Badal Dhurwe
{"title":"Prevalence of use of nonpharmacological methods of pain relief among patients following onco surgeries – A prospective, observational cohort study from a single center","authors":"Sumitra G Bakshi, K. Arya, Badal Dhurwe","doi":"10.4103/joacp.joacp_198_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n For the aggressive treatment of postoperative pain, nonpharmacological methods (NPMs) are gaining importance complementary to routine multimodal pain management. The primary aim of the study was to assess the incidence of use of NPMs in our hospital. Secondary objectives were to correlate the pain scores, patient satisfaction, and percentage of time the patient was in severe pain within 72 h postsurgery with the use of NPMs when in pain/not in pain. The effect of NPMs on the physical and emotional outcome of patients as per the American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ) was also assessed.\n \n \n \n After obtaining approval from the institutional ethics committee (IEC), the trial was registered with the Clinical Trials Registry of India (CTRI). Informed consent was obtained from adult patients on the third postoperative day of elective surgeries. Their responses to the APS-POQ and to a few additional questions about their beliefs on the use of NPM were recorded.\n \n \n \n Only one-fourth of the total study population were using NPMs for pain management in the hospital. After propensity matching for surgery and postoperative analgesia, two groups were made: one using NPM for pain relief (n = 49) and the other not using NPM (n = 98). There was no significant difference among the satisfaction score (P = 0.31), least pain score (P = 0.68), and worst pain score (P = 0.43) within 72 h postoperatively in either of the groups. Emotional and physical outcomes as per the APS-POQ were similar in both the groups.\n \n \n \n NPMs are rarely practiced and used during postoperative pain in our hospital. No difference in pain scores, patient satisfaction, and emotional and physical outcomes of the APS-POQ was seen in the group that indulged in NPMs.\n","PeriodicalId":508221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"1 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_198_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For the aggressive treatment of postoperative pain, nonpharmacological methods (NPMs) are gaining importance complementary to routine multimodal pain management. The primary aim of the study was to assess the incidence of use of NPMs in our hospital. Secondary objectives were to correlate the pain scores, patient satisfaction, and percentage of time the patient was in severe pain within 72 h postsurgery with the use of NPMs when in pain/not in pain. The effect of NPMs on the physical and emotional outcome of patients as per the American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ) was also assessed. After obtaining approval from the institutional ethics committee (IEC), the trial was registered with the Clinical Trials Registry of India (CTRI). Informed consent was obtained from adult patients on the third postoperative day of elective surgeries. Their responses to the APS-POQ and to a few additional questions about their beliefs on the use of NPM were recorded. Only one-fourth of the total study population were using NPMs for pain management in the hospital. After propensity matching for surgery and postoperative analgesia, two groups were made: one using NPM for pain relief (n = 49) and the other not using NPM (n = 98). There was no significant difference among the satisfaction score (P = 0.31), least pain score (P = 0.68), and worst pain score (P = 0.43) within 72 h postoperatively in either of the groups. Emotional and physical outcomes as per the APS-POQ were similar in both the groups. NPMs are rarely practiced and used during postoperative pain in our hospital. No difference in pain scores, patient satisfaction, and emotional and physical outcomes of the APS-POQ was seen in the group that indulged in NPMs.
肿瘤手术后患者使用非药物止痛方法的普遍程度--一项来自单一中心的前瞻性观察性队列研究
为了积极治疗术后疼痛,非药物治疗方法(NPMs)作为常规多模式疼痛治疗的补充正变得越来越重要。本研究的主要目的是评估本医院使用非药物疗法的发生率。次要目的是将疼痛评分、患者满意度以及术后 72 小时内患者处于剧烈疼痛的时间百分比与患者在疼痛/不疼痛时使用 NPM 的情况相关联。此外,还根据美国疼痛学会患者结果问卷(APS-POQ)评估了非手术疗法对患者身体和情绪结果的影响。 在获得机构伦理委员会(IEC)的批准后,该试验在印度临床试验注册中心(CTRI)进行了注册。成年患者在择期手术后第三天获得了知情同意。他们对 APS-POQ 和一些有关使用非预防性措施的信念的附加问题的回答均被记录在案。 在所有研究对象中,只有四分之一的人在医院使用非手术疗法进行疼痛治疗。在对手术和术后镇痛进行倾向性匹配后,分为两组:一组使用非手术疗法止痛(49 人),另一组不使用非手术疗法(98 人)。两组术后 72 小时内的满意度评分(P = 0.31)、最轻疼痛评分(P = 0.68)和最重疼痛评分(P = 0.43)均无明显差异。根据 APS-POQ 测量,两组患者的情绪和身体状况相似。 在我院,术后疼痛很少采用非手术疗法。采用 NPMs 的组别在疼痛评分、患者满意度、APS-POQ 的情感和生理结果方面均无差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信