{"title":"Writing to evaluate","authors":"W. Xuan, Shukun Chen","doi":"10.1075/aral.24027.xua","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Evaluative language is crucial in English for Academic Purposes (EAP) writing, particularly in expressing\n authorial stance and supporting arguments. Among various linguistic frameworks, appraisal in Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL)\n has been extensively used to map and assess evaluative linguistic features. Since its inception in the early 1990s, appraisal has\n been widely applied to EAP writing studies. This synthesis reviews EAP writing studies using the appraisal framework published\n over the past decades, synthesizing 69 publications. We developed coding schemes based on research questions, focusing on learner\n levels, subjects studied, text type, and generated findings. Our findings indicate that appraisal has been applied by EAP writers\n at different levels to perform a range of functions in their writing. However, previous studies show that there is a lack of\n longitudinal study of appraisal resources used by EAP writers at different levels. We recommend systematic and explicit\n instruction in the use of appraisal resources in EAP writing. Based on our findings, we offer pedagogical\n suggestions for EAP writing and teaching, aiming to enhance the effectiveness of EAP instruction and the quality of student\n writing.","PeriodicalId":43911,"journal":{"name":"Australian Review of Applied Linguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Review of Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.24027.xua","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Evaluative language is crucial in English for Academic Purposes (EAP) writing, particularly in expressing
authorial stance and supporting arguments. Among various linguistic frameworks, appraisal in Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL)
has been extensively used to map and assess evaluative linguistic features. Since its inception in the early 1990s, appraisal has
been widely applied to EAP writing studies. This synthesis reviews EAP writing studies using the appraisal framework published
over the past decades, synthesizing 69 publications. We developed coding schemes based on research questions, focusing on learner
levels, subjects studied, text type, and generated findings. Our findings indicate that appraisal has been applied by EAP writers
at different levels to perform a range of functions in their writing. However, previous studies show that there is a lack of
longitudinal study of appraisal resources used by EAP writers at different levels. We recommend systematic and explicit
instruction in the use of appraisal resources in EAP writing. Based on our findings, we offer pedagogical
suggestions for EAP writing and teaching, aiming to enhance the effectiveness of EAP instruction and the quality of student
writing.
期刊介绍:
The Australian Review of Applied Linguistics (ARAL) is the preeminent journal of the Applied Linguistics Association of Australia (ALAA). ARAL is a peer reviewed journal that promotes scholarly discussion and contemporary understandings of language-related matters with a view to impacting on real-world problems and debates. The journal publishes empirical and theoretical research on language/s in educational, professional, institutional and community settings. ARAL welcomes national and international submissions presenting research related to any of the major sub-disciplines of Applied Linguistics as well as transdisciplinary studies. Areas of particular interest include but are not limited to: · Analysis of discourse and interaction · Assessment and evaluation · Bi/multilingualism and bi/multilingual education · Corpus linguistics · Cognitive linguistics · Language, culture and identity · Language maintenance and revitalization · Language planning and policy · Language teaching and learning, including specific languages and TESOL · Pragmatics · Research design and methodology · Second language acquisition · Sociolinguistics · Language and technology · Translating and interpreting.