Critical Thinking in the Context of Embodied Cognition: a Review of Psychological Research and its Pedagogical Potential

Anastasia V. Golubinskaya, Valeria V. Viakhireva
{"title":"Critical Thinking in the Context of Embodied Cognition: a Review of Psychological Research and its Pedagogical Potential","authors":"Anastasia V. Golubinskaya, Valeria V. Viakhireva","doi":"10.17759/pse.2024290309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article presents an overview of current research on critical thinking based on the hypothesis of embodied cognition and representing the so-called non-Cartesian approach to thinking, in which the rational and the sensual do not act independently from each other, but as a closely related group of processes. Despite the fact that the topic of critical thinking in this research area is yet in the process of formation, the review is systematic and contains indications of two main directions, their theoretical guidelines and methodological guidelines. A comparison of the identified approaches makes it possible to identify the mechanisms that are key to any embodied version of the critical thinking model: an individual's sensitivity to his own explicit and implicit epistemic signals, or dispositional attentiveness, and emotional non-activity. It is shown that interdisciplinary transfer in this topic is problematic: knowledge produced in the psychological framework of embodied cognition research is inherently different from knowledge that allows improving the learning process of critical thinking. The results obtained open up prospects for further research and ways to reorganize pedagogical practice in the field of teaching critical thinking","PeriodicalId":507500,"journal":{"name":"Психологическая наука и образование","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Психологическая наука и образование","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17759/pse.2024290309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article presents an overview of current research on critical thinking based on the hypothesis of embodied cognition and representing the so-called non-Cartesian approach to thinking, in which the rational and the sensual do not act independently from each other, but as a closely related group of processes. Despite the fact that the topic of critical thinking in this research area is yet in the process of formation, the review is systematic and contains indications of two main directions, their theoretical guidelines and methodological guidelines. A comparison of the identified approaches makes it possible to identify the mechanisms that are key to any embodied version of the critical thinking model: an individual's sensitivity to his own explicit and implicit epistemic signals, or dispositional attentiveness, and emotional non-activity. It is shown that interdisciplinary transfer in this topic is problematic: knowledge produced in the psychological framework of embodied cognition research is inherently different from knowledge that allows improving the learning process of critical thinking. The results obtained open up prospects for further research and ways to reorganize pedagogical practice in the field of teaching critical thinking
具身认知背景下的批判性思维:心理学研究及其教学潜力综述
本文概述了当前基于具身认知假设的批判性思维研究,代表了所谓的非笛卡尔思维方法,即理性和感性不是相互独立的,而是作为一组密切相关的过程发挥作用。尽管这一研究领域的批判性思维课题尚处于形成过程中,但本综述是系统性的,包含了两个主要方向、其理论指导原则和方法指导原则。通过对已确定的方法进行比较,可以确定对批判性思维模式的任何体现版本都至关重要的机制:个人对自身显性和隐性认识信号的敏感性,或称处置注意力,以及情感上的非活动性。研究表明,在这一课题上进行跨学科转让是有问题的:在具身认知研究的心理学框架内产生的知识与能够改善批判性思维学习过程的知识本质上是不同的。所取得的成果为进一步研究和重组批判性思维教学领域的教学实践开辟了前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信