PLURALISMO RELIGIOSO E SINCRETISMO

Marciano Adilio Spica
{"title":"PLURALISMO RELIGIOSO E SINCRETISMO","authors":"Marciano Adilio Spica","doi":"10.25247/paralellus.2024.v15n36.p189-208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the debates on religious diversity, religions are often taken as fixed, ready and finished. Lived religions, however, are fluid and filled with nuances and syncretisms. Despite this, both philosophical theories and religious institutions frequently view syncretism as a mistake leading to loss of identity, relativism, and logical contradictions. Contra this position, I argue that syncretism is an integral part of even the most diverse religions. Using brief comparisons between Brazilian and Chinese religiosities, I show that religious syncretism is a factual example of pluralism and explain the utility of the concept of syncretism for philosophical debates on religious diversity and studies of comparative religion, as well as the internal function of syncretic practices within religious beliefs systems. Finally, I will show why some criticism of the concept of syncretism is problematic.\n ","PeriodicalId":251972,"journal":{"name":"PARALELLUS Revista de Estudos de Religião - UNICAP","volume":"111 42","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PARALELLUS Revista de Estudos de Religião - UNICAP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25247/paralellus.2024.v15n36.p189-208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the debates on religious diversity, religions are often taken as fixed, ready and finished. Lived religions, however, are fluid and filled with nuances and syncretisms. Despite this, both philosophical theories and religious institutions frequently view syncretism as a mistake leading to loss of identity, relativism, and logical contradictions. Contra this position, I argue that syncretism is an integral part of even the most diverse religions. Using brief comparisons between Brazilian and Chinese religiosities, I show that religious syncretism is a factual example of pluralism and explain the utility of the concept of syncretism for philosophical debates on religious diversity and studies of comparative religion, as well as the internal function of syncretic practices within religious beliefs systems. Finally, I will show why some criticism of the concept of syncretism is problematic.  
宗教多元化和宗教融合
在关于宗教多样性的辩论中,宗教往往被认为是固定的、现成的和终结的。然而,生活中的宗教是多变的,充满了细微差别和融合性。尽管如此,哲学理论和宗教机构都经常把综合主义视为一种错误,会导致身份的丧失、相对主义和逻辑矛盾。与这一立场相反,我认为,即使是最多样化的宗教,其融合主义也是不可或缺的一部分。通过对巴西和中国宗教的简要比较,我说明了宗教融合主义是多元主义的一个实际例子,并解释了融合主义概念对宗教多样性哲学辩论和比较宗教研究的作用,以及融合主义实践在宗教信仰体系中的内在功能。最后,我将说明为什么对综合主义概念的一些批评是有问题的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信