MICRO AND MACRO LIBERTARIANISM: REJOINDER TO McMAKEN

Walter E. Block
{"title":"MICRO AND MACRO LIBERTARIANISM: REJOINDER TO McMAKEN","authors":"Walter E. Block","doi":"10.12709/mest.12.12.se.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Microlibertarianism concerns issues upon which the overwhelming proportion of libertarians agree: minimum wages, rent control, free trade, drug legalization. Macro libertarianism concerns issues upon which there is little or no consensus: voluntary slavery, immigration, abortion, covid vaccinations and the Israeli war with Hamas. The present paper is concerned with only the latter two controversies. McMaken (2024) takes the position that while Block’s views on microlibertarianism are valid, and even, perhaps, commendable, his perspective on these latter two issues is nothing short of highly problematic, not to say abominable. The specific charge of McMaken’s is the Block places his support for Jews in general, and Israel in particular, ahead of libertarianism. Thus, while he may be a good microlibertarian, he is no longer, if ever he was, a good macrolibertarian. The present paper offers a defense of the views of the latter vis a vis the charges of the former.","PeriodicalId":487094,"journal":{"name":"MEST Journal","volume":"118 24","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MEST Journal","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12709/mest.12.12.se.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Microlibertarianism concerns issues upon which the overwhelming proportion of libertarians agree: minimum wages, rent control, free trade, drug legalization. Macro libertarianism concerns issues upon which there is little or no consensus: voluntary slavery, immigration, abortion, covid vaccinations and the Israeli war with Hamas. The present paper is concerned with only the latter two controversies. McMaken (2024) takes the position that while Block’s views on microlibertarianism are valid, and even, perhaps, commendable, his perspective on these latter two issues is nothing short of highly problematic, not to say abominable. The specific charge of McMaken’s is the Block places his support for Jews in general, and Israel in particular, ahead of libertarianism. Thus, while he may be a good microlibertarian, he is no longer, if ever he was, a good macrolibertarian. The present paper offers a defense of the views of the latter vis a vis the charges of the former.
微观和宏观自由主义:麦卡金的再出发
微观自由主义涉及绝大多数自由主义者都同意的问题:最低工资、租金管制、自由贸易、毒品合法化。宏观自由主义涉及几乎没有共识的问题:自愿奴役、移民、堕胎、covid 疫苗接种和以色列与哈马斯的战争。本文只关注后两个争议。麦克马克恩(2024)认为,虽然布洛克对微观自由主义的观点是正确的,甚至可能是值得称赞的,但他对后两个问题的看法却存在很大的问题,更不用说可恶了。麦克马克恩的具体指控是,布洛克把他对犹太人,特别是以色列的支持置于自由主义之上。因此,尽管他可能是一个优秀的微观自由主义者,但他不再是一个优秀的宏观自由主义者,如果他曾经是的话。本文针对前者的指控,为后者的观点辩护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信