Poisson's Ratio-LambdaRho rock physics templates and a study on sensitivity of different fluid indicators

Cem Menlikli, Fearghal Hayes, Jiaqi Zhao, Andrew Wakelin, Zhigang Xu, Hongyao Fan, Don Umbsaar, Kent Wilkinson, Kristian Lomas, Chris Purcell
{"title":"Poisson's Ratio-LambdaRho rock physics templates and a study on sensitivity of different fluid indicators","authors":"Cem Menlikli, Fearghal Hayes, Jiaqi Zhao, Andrew Wakelin, Zhigang Xu, Hongyao Fan, Don Umbsaar, Kent Wilkinson, Kristian Lomas, Chris Purcell","doi":"10.1190/int-2024-0003.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Seismic fluid indicators are highly accurate when calibrated, but when the data is scarce, an interpreter must choose between different indicators. We investigate the data from multiple basins to understand the most effective fluid indicators for use. Unlike previous studies, the data comprises a large, equal, and statistically meaningful number of hydrocarbon and brine sands from different basins. We show that Poisson’s Ratio–LambdaRho templates can be used to separate different facies in synthetic and real data and can be used as a useful crossplot interpretation tool. We propose a fluid indicator, as LambdaRho Poisson’s Ratio multiplication, (λρ)σ, which is highly sensitive to saturation and can be potentially used as a fizz-gas discriminator. We compare the sensitivity of different fluid indicators to hydrocarbon saturation by using Bhattacharyya Distance, which provides a quantitative metric for how well different indicators separate hydrocarbon and brine sands, and it is a non-parametric measure unlike other fluid indicator scores proposed in similar studies. Absolute properties derived from seismic by inversion are rarely available in regional studies, whereas relative elastic properties can be easily obtained and used. Following the concepts of elastic reflectivity vectors and geometry of intercept-gradient crossplots, we show how the reflectivity of different fluid indicators can be approximated from AVO parameters at various chi ( χ) angles, enabling an interpreter to use them even when inversion products are not available. Finally, we compare the effectiveness of relative elastic parameters on different AVO classes and show that no single attribute works best across all classes, but for general screening purposes Fluid Factor and R((λρ)σ) can be good choices. The findings of this study can help better characterization of fluids in exploration, appraisal, and development of hydrocarbons, and in other areas where monitoring produced and injected fluids is important like 4-D seismic or Carbon Capture Storage.","PeriodicalId":502519,"journal":{"name":"Interpretation","volume":"89 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interpretation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1190/int-2024-0003.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Seismic fluid indicators are highly accurate when calibrated, but when the data is scarce, an interpreter must choose between different indicators. We investigate the data from multiple basins to understand the most effective fluid indicators for use. Unlike previous studies, the data comprises a large, equal, and statistically meaningful number of hydrocarbon and brine sands from different basins. We show that Poisson’s Ratio–LambdaRho templates can be used to separate different facies in synthetic and real data and can be used as a useful crossplot interpretation tool. We propose a fluid indicator, as LambdaRho Poisson’s Ratio multiplication, (λρ)σ, which is highly sensitive to saturation and can be potentially used as a fizz-gas discriminator. We compare the sensitivity of different fluid indicators to hydrocarbon saturation by using Bhattacharyya Distance, which provides a quantitative metric for how well different indicators separate hydrocarbon and brine sands, and it is a non-parametric measure unlike other fluid indicator scores proposed in similar studies. Absolute properties derived from seismic by inversion are rarely available in regional studies, whereas relative elastic properties can be easily obtained and used. Following the concepts of elastic reflectivity vectors and geometry of intercept-gradient crossplots, we show how the reflectivity of different fluid indicators can be approximated from AVO parameters at various chi ( χ) angles, enabling an interpreter to use them even when inversion products are not available. Finally, we compare the effectiveness of relative elastic parameters on different AVO classes and show that no single attribute works best across all classes, but for general screening purposes Fluid Factor and R((λρ)σ) can be good choices. The findings of this study can help better characterization of fluids in exploration, appraisal, and development of hydrocarbons, and in other areas where monitoring produced and injected fluids is important like 4-D seismic or Carbon Capture Storage.
泊松比-λRho 岩石物理模板及不同流体指标敏感性研究
地震流体指标经校准后具有很高的准确性,但当数据稀缺时,解释人员必须在不同指标之间做出选择。我们调查了多个盆地的数据,以了解最有效的流体指标。与以往的研究不同,我们的数据包括来自不同盆地的大量、相等且具有统计意义的碳氢化合物和卤水砂。我们的研究表明,泊松比-LambdaRho 模板可用于分离合成数据和真实数据中的不同岩相,并可用作有用的交叉图解释工具。我们提出了一种流体指标,即 LambdaRho 泊松比乘法 (λρ)σ ,它对饱和度高度敏感,可用作咝咝气鉴别器。我们使用巴塔查里亚距离(Bhattacharyya Distance)比较了不同流体指标对烃类饱和度的敏感性,它提供了一个量化指标,用于衡量不同指标在多大程度上将烃类和卤水砂区分开来,与类似研究中提出的其他流体指标评分不同,它是一种非参数测量方法。在区域研究中,很少有通过反演从地震中得出的绝对属性,而相对弹性属性却很容易获得和使用。根据弹性反射率矢量和截距-梯度交叉图几何的概念,我们展示了不同流体指标的反射率如何从不同chi ( χ) 角的AVO参数中近似得出,从而使解释人员即使在没有反演产品的情况下也能使用它们。最后,我们比较了相对弹性参数对不同AVO类别的有效性,结果表明,没有一种属性对所有类别都最有效,但对于一般筛选目的,流体因子和R((λρ)σ)是不错的选择。这项研究的结果有助于在碳氢化合物的勘探、评估和开发过程中更好地描述流体的特征,也有助于在其他对生产和注入流体的监测非常重要的领域(如四维地震或碳捕集封存)更好地描述流体的特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信