Cem Menlikli, Fearghal Hayes, Jiaqi Zhao, Andrew Wakelin, Zhigang Xu, Hongyao Fan, Don Umbsaar, Kent Wilkinson, Kristian Lomas, Chris Purcell
{"title":"Poisson's Ratio-LambdaRho rock physics templates and a study on sensitivity of different fluid indicators","authors":"Cem Menlikli, Fearghal Hayes, Jiaqi Zhao, Andrew Wakelin, Zhigang Xu, Hongyao Fan, Don Umbsaar, Kent Wilkinson, Kristian Lomas, Chris Purcell","doi":"10.1190/int-2024-0003.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Seismic fluid indicators are highly accurate when calibrated, but when the data is scarce, an interpreter must choose between different indicators. We investigate the data from multiple basins to understand the most effective fluid indicators for use. Unlike previous studies, the data comprises a large, equal, and statistically meaningful number of hydrocarbon and brine sands from different basins. We show that Poisson’s Ratio–LambdaRho templates can be used to separate different facies in synthetic and real data and can be used as a useful crossplot interpretation tool. We propose a fluid indicator, as LambdaRho Poisson’s Ratio multiplication, (λρ)σ, which is highly sensitive to saturation and can be potentially used as a fizz-gas discriminator. We compare the sensitivity of different fluid indicators to hydrocarbon saturation by using Bhattacharyya Distance, which provides a quantitative metric for how well different indicators separate hydrocarbon and brine sands, and it is a non-parametric measure unlike other fluid indicator scores proposed in similar studies. Absolute properties derived from seismic by inversion are rarely available in regional studies, whereas relative elastic properties can be easily obtained and used. Following the concepts of elastic reflectivity vectors and geometry of intercept-gradient crossplots, we show how the reflectivity of different fluid indicators can be approximated from AVO parameters at various chi ( χ) angles, enabling an interpreter to use them even when inversion products are not available. Finally, we compare the effectiveness of relative elastic parameters on different AVO classes and show that no single attribute works best across all classes, but for general screening purposes Fluid Factor and R((λρ)σ) can be good choices. The findings of this study can help better characterization of fluids in exploration, appraisal, and development of hydrocarbons, and in other areas where monitoring produced and injected fluids is important like 4-D seismic or Carbon Capture Storage.","PeriodicalId":502519,"journal":{"name":"Interpretation","volume":"89 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interpretation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1190/int-2024-0003.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Seismic fluid indicators are highly accurate when calibrated, but when the data is scarce, an interpreter must choose between different indicators. We investigate the data from multiple basins to understand the most effective fluid indicators for use. Unlike previous studies, the data comprises a large, equal, and statistically meaningful number of hydrocarbon and brine sands from different basins. We show that Poisson’s Ratio–LambdaRho templates can be used to separate different facies in synthetic and real data and can be used as a useful crossplot interpretation tool. We propose a fluid indicator, as LambdaRho Poisson’s Ratio multiplication, (λρ)σ, which is highly sensitive to saturation and can be potentially used as a fizz-gas discriminator. We compare the sensitivity of different fluid indicators to hydrocarbon saturation by using Bhattacharyya Distance, which provides a quantitative metric for how well different indicators separate hydrocarbon and brine sands, and it is a non-parametric measure unlike other fluid indicator scores proposed in similar studies. Absolute properties derived from seismic by inversion are rarely available in regional studies, whereas relative elastic properties can be easily obtained and used. Following the concepts of elastic reflectivity vectors and geometry of intercept-gradient crossplots, we show how the reflectivity of different fluid indicators can be approximated from AVO parameters at various chi ( χ) angles, enabling an interpreter to use them even when inversion products are not available. Finally, we compare the effectiveness of relative elastic parameters on different AVO classes and show that no single attribute works best across all classes, but for general screening purposes Fluid Factor and R((λρ)σ) can be good choices. The findings of this study can help better characterization of fluids in exploration, appraisal, and development of hydrocarbons, and in other areas where monitoring produced and injected fluids is important like 4-D seismic or Carbon Capture Storage.