Computational investigation and biological activity of selected Schiff bases

S. Oladipo, Adesola A. Adeleke, A. A. Badeji, Katherine I. Babalola, A. H. Labulo, Ibrahim Hassan, Sadiq T. Yussuf, Samuel O. Olalekan
{"title":"Computational investigation and biological activity of selected Schiff bases","authors":"S. Oladipo, Adesola A. Adeleke, A. A. Badeji, Katherine I. Babalola, A. H. Labulo, Ibrahim Hassan, Sadiq T. Yussuf, Samuel O. Olalekan","doi":"10.46481/jnsps.2024.2103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two Schiff bases, (E)-N-(4-bromophenyl)-1-(2,6-dichlorophenyl)methanimine (S1) and (E)-4-(((4-bromophenyl)imino)methyl)phenol (S2) were synthesized and elucidated using basic spectroscopic methods such as Fourier-transform-infrared, Ultraviolet-visible as well as 1H & 13C-NMR while purity of the compounds was ascertained by the means of elemental analysis. The stability, chemical reactivities and electronic properties of S1 and S2 were evaluated using Density Functional Theory (DFT). Energy band gap (?E) of S1 and S2 are 2.81 eV and 3.02 eV respectively and this inferred that S1 is more reactive as well as less stable than S2. The Molecular electrostatic potential (MEP) mapping evaluation showed that both S1 and S2 are having more of the yellow, green and red region than the blue region, signifying that these structures are prone to electrophilic attack. The compounds were screened against one Gram-negative (Staphylococcus aureus) and two Gram-positive bacteria (Klebsiella pneumoniae and Psedomonas aeruginosa) to evaluate their antibacterial potential.  S1 as well as S2 showed antibacterial potential against Staphylococcus aureus and exhibited less of no activity against Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli. In silico studies of S1 and S2 against Staphylococcus aureus was carried out and the outcomes corroborate with experimental findings. Pharmacological evaluation of S1 and S2 showed that both compounds exhibited less violation of Lipinski’s rule of five (Ro5) which pose them to be less toxic and orally available.","PeriodicalId":342917,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Nigerian Society of Physical Sciences","volume":"43 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Nigerian Society of Physical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46481/jnsps.2024.2103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Two Schiff bases, (E)-N-(4-bromophenyl)-1-(2,6-dichlorophenyl)methanimine (S1) and (E)-4-(((4-bromophenyl)imino)methyl)phenol (S2) were synthesized and elucidated using basic spectroscopic methods such as Fourier-transform-infrared, Ultraviolet-visible as well as 1H & 13C-NMR while purity of the compounds was ascertained by the means of elemental analysis. The stability, chemical reactivities and electronic properties of S1 and S2 were evaluated using Density Functional Theory (DFT). Energy band gap (?E) of S1 and S2 are 2.81 eV and 3.02 eV respectively and this inferred that S1 is more reactive as well as less stable than S2. The Molecular electrostatic potential (MEP) mapping evaluation showed that both S1 and S2 are having more of the yellow, green and red region than the blue region, signifying that these structures are prone to electrophilic attack. The compounds were screened against one Gram-negative (Staphylococcus aureus) and two Gram-positive bacteria (Klebsiella pneumoniae and Psedomonas aeruginosa) to evaluate their antibacterial potential.  S1 as well as S2 showed antibacterial potential against Staphylococcus aureus and exhibited less of no activity against Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli. In silico studies of S1 and S2 against Staphylococcus aureus was carried out and the outcomes corroborate with experimental findings. Pharmacological evaluation of S1 and S2 showed that both compounds exhibited less violation of Lipinski’s rule of five (Ro5) which pose them to be less toxic and orally available.
选定希夫碱的计算研究和生物活性
利用傅立叶变换红外光谱、紫外可见光谱以及 1H 和 13C-NMR 等基本光谱方法合成并阐明了 (E)-N-(4-bromophenyl)-1-(2,6-dichlorophenyl)methanimine (S1) 和 (E)-4-(((4-bromophenyl)imino)methyl)phenol (S2) 这两种希夫碱,并通过元素分析方法确定了化合物的纯度。利用密度泛函理论(DFT)对 S1 和 S2 的稳定性、化学反应活性和电子特性进行了评估。S1 和 S2 的能带隙(?E)分别为 2.81 eV 和 3.02 eV,这推断出 S1 比 S2 反应性更高,稳定性更低。分子静电位(MEP)绘图评估显示,S1 和 S2 的黄色、绿色和红色区域多于蓝色区域,这表明这些结构容易受到亲电攻击。化合物针对一种革兰氏阴性菌(金黄色葡萄球菌)和两种革兰氏阳性菌(肺炎克雷伯氏菌和铜绿假单胞菌)进行了筛选,以评估其抗菌潜力。 S1 和 S2 对金黄色葡萄球菌具有抗菌潜力,而对肺炎克雷伯氏菌和大肠杆菌的活性较低,甚至没有活性。对 S1 和 S2 对金黄色葡萄球菌的抗菌作用进行了硅学研究,结果与实验结果相吻合。对 S1 和 S2 进行的药理评估表明,这两种化合物较少违反利宾斯基五条规则(Ro5),因此毒性较低,可口服。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信