Visualization and Quantification of Facemask Leakage Flows and Interpersonal Transmission with Varying Face Coverings

Fluids Pub Date : 2024-07-22 DOI:10.3390/fluids9070166
X. Si, Jensen S. Xi, Mohamed Talaat, Jay Hoon Park, Ramaswamy Nagarajan, Michael Rein, Jinxiang Xi
{"title":"Visualization and Quantification of Facemask Leakage Flows and Interpersonal Transmission with Varying Face Coverings","authors":"X. Si, Jensen S. Xi, Mohamed Talaat, Jay Hoon Park, Ramaswamy Nagarajan, Michael Rein, Jinxiang Xi","doi":"10.3390/fluids9070166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although mask-wearing is now widespread, the knowledge of how to quantify or improve their performance remains surprisingly limited and is largely based on empirical evidence. The objective of this study was to visualize the expiratory airflows from facemasks and evaluate aerosol transmission between two persons. Different visualization methods were explored, including the Schlieren optical system, laser/LED-particle imaging system, thermal camera, and vapor–SarGel system. The leakage flows and escaped aerosols were quantified using a hotwire anemometer and a particle counter, respectively. The results show that mask-wearing reduces the exhaled flow velocity from 2~4 m/s (with no facemask) to around 0.1 m/s, thus decreasing droplet transmission speeds. Cloth, surgical, and KN95 masks showed varying leakage flows at the nose top, sides, and chin. The leakage rate also differed between inhalation and exhalation. The neck gaiter has low filtration efficiency and high leakage fractions, providing low protection efficiency. There was considerable deposition in the mouth–nose area, as well as the neck, chin, and jaw, which heightened the risk of self-inoculation through spontaneous face-touching. A face shield plus surgical mask greatly reduced droplets on the head, neck, and face, indicating that double face coverings can be highly effective when a single mask is insufficient. The vapor–SarGel system provided a practical approach to study interpersonal transmission under varying close contact scenarios or with different face coverings.","PeriodicalId":510749,"journal":{"name":"Fluids","volume":"24 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fluids","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids9070166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although mask-wearing is now widespread, the knowledge of how to quantify or improve their performance remains surprisingly limited and is largely based on empirical evidence. The objective of this study was to visualize the expiratory airflows from facemasks and evaluate aerosol transmission between two persons. Different visualization methods were explored, including the Schlieren optical system, laser/LED-particle imaging system, thermal camera, and vapor–SarGel system. The leakage flows and escaped aerosols were quantified using a hotwire anemometer and a particle counter, respectively. The results show that mask-wearing reduces the exhaled flow velocity from 2~4 m/s (with no facemask) to around 0.1 m/s, thus decreasing droplet transmission speeds. Cloth, surgical, and KN95 masks showed varying leakage flows at the nose top, sides, and chin. The leakage rate also differed between inhalation and exhalation. The neck gaiter has low filtration efficiency and high leakage fractions, providing low protection efficiency. There was considerable deposition in the mouth–nose area, as well as the neck, chin, and jaw, which heightened the risk of self-inoculation through spontaneous face-touching. A face shield plus surgical mask greatly reduced droplets on the head, neck, and face, indicating that double face coverings can be highly effective when a single mask is insufficient. The vapor–SarGel system provided a practical approach to study interpersonal transmission under varying close contact scenarios or with different face coverings.
可视化和量化面罩泄漏流量和不同面罩下的人际传播
尽管佩戴口罩现已十分普遍,但人们对如何量化或改善口罩性能的了解仍然非常有限,而且主要是基于经验证据。本研究的目的是可视化面罩的呼出气流,并评估气溶胶在两人之间的传播情况。研究人员探索了不同的可视化方法,包括 Schlieren 光学系统、激光/LED 粒子成像系统、热像仪和蒸汽-SarGel 系统。使用热线风速计和粒子计数器分别对泄漏流量和逸散气溶胶进行了量化。结果表明,佩戴面罩使呼气流速从 2~4 米/秒(无面罩时)降低到 0.1 米/秒左右,从而降低了雾滴的传播速度。布质口罩、手术口罩和 KN95 口罩在鼻顶、两侧和下巴处显示出不同的泄漏流量。吸气和呼气时的泄漏率也有所不同。颈部防护罩过滤效率低,泄漏率高,防护效率低。口鼻部位以及颈部、下巴和颌部有大量沉积物,这增加了通过自发面部接触自我接种的风险。面罩加外科口罩大大减少了头部、颈部和脸部的飞沫,这表明在单个口罩不足以防护的情况下,双层面罩可以起到很好的效果。蒸汽-SarGel 系统提供了一种实用的方法,用于研究在不同密切接触情况下或使用不同面罩时的人际传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信