The Evolving Workplace: The Possible Impacts of Hybrid Working and Hotdesking on Retention of Social Workers

A. Pulman, L. Fenge
{"title":"The Evolving Workplace: The Possible Impacts of Hybrid Working and Hotdesking on Retention of Social Workers","authors":"A. Pulman, L. Fenge","doi":"10.1093/bjsw/bcae120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Challenges with the retention of social workers have increased over the past ten years with links made to higher caseloads, increased stress, shrinking office space and hybridisation of work roles driven by both austerity and changes resulting from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This article reports on findings from a study developed with two local authorities exploring retention in adult social care from the perspective of practitioners working in the South of England. A mixed methods approach was taken. A group of (n = 57) social workers at two local authorities completed an online survey and (n = 13) were interviewed in depth. A semi-structured interview schedule was constructed to collect expanded reflections on issues affecting retention. Several themes emerged concerning the differential impacts of the changing workplace post-COVID-19. These include increased stress and high caseloads and the potential negative impact of hotdesking and hybrid working on supervision and well-being. We discuss areas where changes might address some of the current concerns highlighted by participants, which may in turn exert a positive impact on retention.","PeriodicalId":185272,"journal":{"name":"The British Journal of Social Work","volume":"35 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British Journal of Social Work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcae120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Challenges with the retention of social workers have increased over the past ten years with links made to higher caseloads, increased stress, shrinking office space and hybridisation of work roles driven by both austerity and changes resulting from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This article reports on findings from a study developed with two local authorities exploring retention in adult social care from the perspective of practitioners working in the South of England. A mixed methods approach was taken. A group of (n = 57) social workers at two local authorities completed an online survey and (n = 13) were interviewed in depth. A semi-structured interview schedule was constructed to collect expanded reflections on issues affecting retention. Several themes emerged concerning the differential impacts of the changing workplace post-COVID-19. These include increased stress and high caseloads and the potential negative impact of hotdesking and hybrid working on supervision and well-being. We discuss areas where changes might address some of the current concerns highlighted by participants, which may in turn exert a positive impact on retention.
不断变化的工作场所:混合工作和办公桌轮用对留住社会工作者的可能影响
在过去十年中,社会工作者的留任问题日益突出,这与案件量增加、压力增大、办公空间缩小以及因紧缩政策和 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行而导致的工作角色混合有关。本文报告了与两个地方当局合作开展的一项研究的结果,该研究从在英格兰南部工作的从业人员的角度探讨了成人社会护理领域的留任问题。研究采用了混合方法。两个地方当局的一组社会工作者(n = 57)完成了一项在线调查,另有(n = 13)人接受了深入访谈。设计了一个半结构化访谈表,以收集对影响留任问题的更多思考。出现了几个主题,涉及《19 世纪性别暴力与发展议程》后不断变化的工作场所所产生的不同影响。其中包括压力增大、工作量增加,以及 "办公桌轮用 "和 "混合工作 "对监督和福利的潜在负面影响。我们讨论了在哪些领域的变革可以解决与会者强调的一些当前关切问题,这反过来可能会对留任产生积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信