A “Killing Fully Acceptable to God”: Sepúlveda and Erasmus on the War against the Turks

IF 0.2 3区 历史学 0 MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES
Glen Carman
{"title":"A “Killing Fully Acceptable to God”: Sepúlveda and Erasmus on the War against the Turks","authors":"Glen Carman","doi":"10.33137/rr.v47i2.43680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sultan Suleiman’s siege of Vienna in 1529 prompted a new round of treatises from humanists proposing ways to confront the Ottoman threat, including from Erasmus of Rotterdam and Juan Ginés de Sepúlveda, who approached the question from almost opposite positions. This article examines how the antimilitarist Erasmus responded to the imperialistic aspirations of such calls to arms as the exhortation written by Sepúlveda. Whereas Sepúlveda sees war with the Ottomans as an existential battle of civilizations, Erasmus looks inward for the causes of the conflict and the path to victory, both of which he connects to the urgent need for reform from within. The metaphorically violent edge of Erasmus’s appeal to battle an “interior Turk” conjures up cultural as well as religious hierarchies, but his dual understanding of the threat to Christianity as coming from both within and without distinguishes it from much of the chauvinism fomented by war.","PeriodicalId":43520,"journal":{"name":"RENAISSANCE AND REFORMATION","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RENAISSANCE AND REFORMATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33137/rr.v47i2.43680","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sultan Suleiman’s siege of Vienna in 1529 prompted a new round of treatises from humanists proposing ways to confront the Ottoman threat, including from Erasmus of Rotterdam and Juan Ginés de Sepúlveda, who approached the question from almost opposite positions. This article examines how the antimilitarist Erasmus responded to the imperialistic aspirations of such calls to arms as the exhortation written by Sepúlveda. Whereas Sepúlveda sees war with the Ottomans as an existential battle of civilizations, Erasmus looks inward for the causes of the conflict and the path to victory, both of which he connects to the urgent need for reform from within. The metaphorically violent edge of Erasmus’s appeal to battle an “interior Turk” conjures up cultural as well as religious hierarchies, but his dual understanding of the threat to Christianity as coming from both within and without distinguishes it from much of the chauvinism fomented by war.
上帝完全接受的杀戮":塞普尔韦达和伊拉斯谟论对土耳其人的战争
1529 年,苏丹苏莱曼围攻维也纳,促使人文主义者发表新一轮论文,提出对抗奥斯曼帝国威胁的方法,其中包括鹿特丹的伊拉斯谟和胡安-吉内斯-德-塞普尔韦达,他们在这个问题上的立场几乎截然相反。本文探讨了反军国主义的伊拉斯谟如何回应塞普尔韦达所写的劝告书中的帝国主义诉求。塞普尔韦达将与奥斯曼人的战争视为一场文明间的生存之战,而伊拉斯谟则向内寻找冲突的原因和通往胜利的道路,他将这两者与从内部进行改革的迫切需要联系在一起。伊拉斯谟呼吁与 "内部土耳其人 "作战,其隐喻性的暴力边缘让人联想到文化和宗教等级制度,但他对基督教所面临的来自内部和外部威胁的双重理解,使其有别于战争所煽动的沙文主义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
RENAISSANCE AND REFORMATION
RENAISSANCE AND REFORMATION MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
142
期刊介绍: The Centre for Reformation and Renaissance Studies (CRRS) is a research and teaching centre with a library devoted to the study of the period from approximately 1350 to 1700. The CRRS supervises an undergraduate program in Renaissance Studies, organizes lectures and seminars, and maintains an active series of publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信