Recent judicial rulings on collective bargaining

Jesús Cruz Villalón
{"title":"Recent judicial rulings on collective bargaining","authors":"Jesús Cruz Villalón","doi":"10.35295/osls.iisl.2095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to take a look at the most outstanding interpretative questions of the current regulation of collective bargaining, analysing the criteria that has been given to them by the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court. From this analysis it can be deduced that the rulings handed down on the matter have on some occasions been clarifying, providing the necessary legal certainty, on other occasions it has been a creative jurisprudence that has not failed to spark debate among scientific doctrine and, finally, in some cases, the difficulties in applying such criteria are pointed out, even pointing out on occasion the opportunity to carry out some type of legal intervention to definitively solution to the regulatory gaps detected.","PeriodicalId":508645,"journal":{"name":"Oñati Socio-Legal Series","volume":"37 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oñati Socio-Legal Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.2095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to take a look at the most outstanding interpretative questions of the current regulation of collective bargaining, analysing the criteria that has been given to them by the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court. From this analysis it can be deduced that the rulings handed down on the matter have on some occasions been clarifying, providing the necessary legal certainty, on other occasions it has been a creative jurisprudence that has not failed to spark debate among scientific doctrine and, finally, in some cases, the difficulties in applying such criteria are pointed out, even pointing out on occasion the opportunity to carry out some type of legal intervention to definitively solution to the regulatory gaps detected.
近期关于集体谈判的司法裁决
本研究旨在探讨现行集体谈判条例中最突出的解释性问题,分析最高法院判例对这些问题的判定标准。从这一分析中可以推断出,就这一问题做出的裁决在某些情况下是明确的,提供了必要的法律确定性;在另一些情况下,它是一种创造性的判例,不失时机地引发了科学理论界的争论;最后,在某些情况下,指出了适用这些标准的困难,甚至有时指出有机会进行某种类型的法律干预,以最终解决所发现的监管漏洞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信